Talking Footy

Vlad Tepes wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

It's a game for young boys who have not filled out physically nor mentally. And there's lots of them around so its good for sookers participation rates. The drop off in sooker participation at 15 or so, when males generally begin to fill out physically and mentally, is quite phenomenal.

Comprehende?

Right, so a game that requires much more awareness, intelligence and dexterity then RL will be abandoned in favour of RL by hundreds of thousands of kids around the nation. Right, yes, keep believing that.......

Pretty sure soccer still beats RL in participation above 15 years of age, as would a whole host of other sports for that matter. Historically there was some drop off because teenagers always dream of making it big where the crowds are, but now that soccer is on the ascendancy, and offers some of the best crowds and atmosphere in Australian sport, not to mention the most competitive international competition, so just watch what happens. =D>

who invited this ignorant cumstain?

"futsal's" safe

104,000 people play Rugby League in Australia, safe, not safe, don't know, what i do know is it is irrelevant.

Volleyball has nearly the same number of people playing it as Rugby League does, Badminton is breathing down their neck

less than 104k people in Australia bother to set their eyes anywhere near an oi league match

Ohhhhhohohohoh.... the insignificance is astounding.

women's cricket say's g'day

I mean, women's cricket is awesome but in my experience the vast majority of women despise the game. It's a full on minority of women that enjoy it....yet the numbers don't lie. Women's cricket outrates the oi league

King-Eliagh wrote:

less than 104k people in Australia bother to set their eyes anywhere near an oi league match

Ohhhhhohohohoh.... the insignificance is astounding.

women's cricket say's g'day

KE_liar more lies from you I see, it is rather obvious than when you start losing an argument you get all manic and start blubbering lies. Sad fact is you keep being caught out in your lies.

lets quote you

"less than 104k people in Australia bother to set their eyes anywhere near AN A league match"

wow that shouldn't be too hard to shoot down, shall we go to the wookie and confirm that yes, we have confirmation

Round 1 Victory versus WSW (not a happy night for me bad bad loss) what was the figure 280,000 people.

Now let's see 280,000 is bigger than 104,000 do we all have agreement on that? wow so sorry KE_liar once again caught lying to the board.

I know I shouldn't gloat clearly you have some major educational deficiencies, so might I suggest you take a step back re-asses your life and find something else, clearly thinking isn't your best attribute.

My bad. Allow me to rephrase. Most of the time less than 104k bother to set eyes on an A-League match.

can you check that one up for me gopher? I'm pretty sure im right, as I am about 98% of the time

And if I am right, the point remains the same. Sooker is an insignificant code in Australia, which it truly truly is

Womens cricket

King-Eliagh wrote:

Vlad Tepes wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

It's a game for young boys who have not filled out physically nor mentally. And there's lots of them around so its good for sookers participation rates. The drop off in sooker participation at 15 or so, when males generally begin to fill out physically and mentally, is quite phenomenal.

Comprehende?

Right, so a game that requires much more awareness, intelligence and dexterity then RL will be abandoned in favour of RL by hundreds of thousands of kids around the nation. Right, yes, keep believing that.......

Pretty sure soccer still beats RL in participation above 15 years of age, as would a whole host of other sports for that matter. Historically there was some drop off because teenagers always dream of making it big where the crowds are, but now that soccer is on the ascendancy, and offers some of the best crowds and atmosphere in Australian sport, not to mention the most competitive international competition, so just watch what happens. =D>

who invited this ignorant cumstain?

Spoken like a true redneck.

What I said is true though. Hardly anybody plays neanderthal ball compared to the more civilized codes. Why can't you address this honestly? How shit is your code when hardly anybody plays it and yet Origin and Kangaroos are considered 'world class', the elite

104,000 people play Rugby League, the very definition of insignificant

Round 1 average 141,000 whoops still more than 104,000 wrong again
Round 2 average 132,000 whoops still more than 104,000 still wrong, this 98% claim of yours looks like it is another of your lies KE_liar
Round 3 average 164,500 for the two games that wookie has posted, whoops still more than 104,000.

So of the 3 rounds that are posted on this forum all of them average more than the 104,000 "NEW" claim, remember the old claim has been changed by KE_liar, so even this "new" claim is wrong.

why oh why KE_liar do you keep lying to the board, it appears to be habitual

Vlad Tepes wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Vlad Tepes wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

It's a game for young boys who have not filled out physically nor mentally. And there's lots of them around so its good for sookers participation rates. The drop off in sooker participation at 15 or so, when males generally begin to fill out physically and mentally, is quite phenomenal.

Comprehende?

Right, so a game that requires much more awareness, intelligence and dexterity then RL will be abandoned in favour of RL by hundreds of thousands of kids around the nation. Right, yes, keep believing that.......

Pretty sure soccer still beats RL in participation above 15 years of age, as would a whole host of other sports for that matter. Historically there was some drop off because teenagers always dream of making it big where the crowds are, but now that soccer is on the ascendancy, and offers some of the best crowds and atmosphere in Australian sport, not to mention the most competitive international competition, so just watch what happens. =D>

who invited this ignorant cumstain?

Spoken like a true redneck.

What I said is true though. Hardly anybody plays neanderthal ball compared to the more civilized codes. Why can't you address this honestly? How shit is your code when hardly anybody plays it and yet Origin and Kangaroos are considered 'world class', the elite

It's a highly physically demanding code ya filthy pig. Only the most elite and athletic men in the country can make a good income out of it. And even in the lower grades it remains very physical demanding whereas sooker attracts hacks from all walks of life because it doesnt require barely any physical commitment, particularly in the lower levels. Pensioners, anorexics, thai ladyboys, toddlers, skinny weeds, dogs, (if you give them a little training) elephants (they're actually pretty decent players) and transvestites can all physically play and display the fundamental skills required without too much trouble. Unfortunately they know its a different ball game when it comes to RL

Jesus, vlad. grow some braincells. This aint rocketscience here bro. Everyone knows sooker is less physical demanding and requires less skill from your average punter than RL. It's just plain bloody obvious.

k?

"elite athelete"

Why are the sokkawhos sruggling?

Because only wimps play the fucking game, all the tough carrrnts are in the stands jumping up and down on seats while downloading the latest green street blah blah blah.


Hahahahaha

King-Eliagh wrote:

Vlad Tepes wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Vlad Tepes wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Jesus, vlad. grow some braincells. This aint rocketscience here bro. Everyone knows sooker is less physical demanding and requires less skill from your average punter than RL. It's just plain bloody obvious.

k?

K bro. You've got me convinced.

I like you, you're alright