Talking Footy

Posted: **Fri Aug 29, 2014 10:29 am**

NlolRL wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
They made and didn't come last in the pinnacle of ur sport! :_<>

And all for the cost of $$$ 7,000,000+ Game over. :_<>
Both were star rl players yet failed to execute simple AFL skills to the level required to be a regular player

Ouch

Ouch? Oh deAr this ones starting to go soft on us

How many games did the AFL player play for western reds? 1

Khunt? 44 ... That'd be about the amount of times he's more physically capable than that AFL bum

Ahh tha facts. They tell a lot don't they?

Posted: **Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:15 pm**

Why would an AFL player take a pay cut to play a nrl.

Posted: **Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:38 pm**

King-Eliagh wrote:
NlolRL wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
They made and didn't come last in the pinnacle of ur sport! :_<>

And all for the cost of $$$ 7,000,000+ Game over. :_<>
Both were star rl players yet failed to execute simple AFL skills to the level required to be a regular player

Ouch
Ouch? Oh deAr this ones starting to go soft on us

How many games did the AFL player play for western reds? 1

Khunt? 44 ... That'd be about the amount of times he's more physically capable than that AFL bum

Ahh tha facts. They tell a lot don't they?

Which STAR AFL player played for the Reds?

>

Posted: **Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:49 pm**

Phelpsy wrote:
Why would an AFL player take a pay cut to play a nrl.

VFL players will be earning less then NRL players inside 10 years junior fruitloop
our media rights deals will far exceed the VFL's in the coming decades

& when this occurs
do you think the NRL will make a mockery of its comp by signing any of those unco weedy stick insects
I think not

I

think not

Posted: **Fri Aug 29, 2014 7:30 pm**

King-Eliagh wrote:
Fact is he made it to AFL with no experience Barr rl

And on ur flip side argument I.e he was worth it for promo... Can anyone give us some evidence about the impact the AFL 7 odd million experiment with the more athletically superior rl folks made in the game re recruits???

Nup nuttin there neither. The most botched ridiculous spending of 7 odd million we've ever ever seen in sporting history in australia, most probably the WORLD. They coulda done so so so so so so much but they did SO so so so so so so little. The think tank down at AFL hq are no smarter than the dumbest of dumbest chimps on the planet.

What a fukkin disgrace!

You talk the talk but you can't walk the walk. If these superior athletes are so superior then why aren't they still playing the game winning best and fairest, Coleman medals, and ripping up games. They are getting the money due to promotion, but they were inferior athletes overall in our game. Nothing more really to say.

Posted: **Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:30 pm**

No pies you silly twat. Their superior athleticism allowed then to make the cut, comfortably really. Their marngrook skill set let them down, which is nothing to do with athleticism

comprehende?

Oh and lemme repeat. An AFL player cannot do the same in reverse. Nup, their just not cut out to be able to.

Posted: **Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:32 pm**

Oh and in the other issue I'm winning on. Leigh Mathews an AFL legend totally agrees with me what a waste of money and time the whole experiment was!

http://m.smh.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/leigh- ... 09trk.html

:_<> Celt he more accurately estimates it at $10,000,000 rather than 7 from the AFL player pool spent on Izzy and khunt.

What a fukkin absolute disaster!!!!

Posted: **Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:48 pm**

King-Eliagh wrote:
No pies you silly twat. Their superior athleticism allowed then to make the cut, comfortably really. Their marngrook skill set let them down, which is nothing to do with athleticism comprehende?

Oh and lemme repeat. An AFL player cannot do the same in reverse. Nup, their just not cut out to be able to.

They never really made the cut. They were experiments and they failed. Athletism was non existent out on the field. They looked slow, had no stamina and they had no agility. If Hunt goes back to league he will cut them up next year. Your all talk on this one as well mate.

Posted: **Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:20 am**

So pies ur saying the AFL willingly compromised the on field performance of their two newest most vulnerable teams for 'an experiment'? Is that what ur saying the AFL did?

I agree with this too but both khunt and izzy also showed great skill strength speed agility beyond this of the ordinary AFL player. Shall I produce some you tube footage to remind you pies? They showed they could also make the cut

something no AFL player could do in the nrl

Posted: **Sat Aug 30, 2014 7:22 am**

King-Eliagh wrote:
So pies ur saying the AFL willingly compromised the on field performance of their two newest most vulnerable teams for 'an experiment'? Is that what ur saying the AFL did?

Pretty much. Neither the Suns or Giants were going to be regularly competitive in their first 3 years, so including one player within a team of 22 for promotional purposes was reasonable

Posted: **Sat Aug 30, 2014 9:37 am**

NlolRL wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
So pies ur saying the AFL willingly compromised the on field performance of their two newest most vulnerable teams for 'an experiment'? Is that what ur saying the AFL did?

Pretty much. Neither the Suns or Giants were going to be regularly competitive in their first 3 years, so including one player within a team of 22 for promotional purposes was reasonable

reasonable ?

:_<> :_<> :_<>
it showed the VFL had failed it its 30 year attempt to convert nthn sports fans to their bumbling crap

they had to turn their newest sides into circus's
using the local dominant codes players to attract interest ...................... pathetic is the word to describe this dickhead
not reasonable

pathetic

Posted: **Sat Aug 30, 2014 9:59 am**

Raiderdave wrote:
NlolRL wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
So pies ur saying the AFL willingly compromised the on field performance of their two newest most vulnerable teams for 'an experiment'? Is that what ur saying the AFL did?

Pretty much. Neither the Suns or Giants were going to be regularly competitive in their first 3 years, so including one player within a team of 22 for promotional purposes was reasonable
reasonable ?

:_<> :_<> :_<>
it showed the VFL had failed it its 30 year attempt to convert nthn sports fans to their bumbling crap

they had to turn their newest sides into circus's
using the local dominant codes players to attract interest ...................... pathetic is the word to describe this dickhead
not reasonable

pathetic

if having Sydneys biggest average crowd drawer is a failure how the hell would you rate the NRLs expansion with the storm?

Posted: **Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:03 pm**

Khunt and izzy in their lack of brilliant on field performances along with their snatching of ... Wait for it ... ... ... $10,000,000 + from the AFL player pool before turning their backs on the game will have no doubt turned thousands of kids off the game! Thousands! No doubt about it.

There's simply no proof to suggest otherwise. And anyone with a logical mind would know, kids respect brilliant on field performance like the rest of us, they're not stoopid so why tha fukk would any kid take up following or playing the code because of izzy or khunt?

Posted: **Sat Aug 30, 2014 3:49 pm**

King-Eliagh wrote:
would any kid take up following or playing the code because of izzy or khunt?

Yes.

Posted: **Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:53 am**

Ohhhohohooooh zing! I see what u did there cuzzy! Akin to getting urself a toupee. Trying to make something which looks bad good. But everyone knows what you've done and laughs at what a sad case you are.

Cuzzy do you got a toupee?

Now Get real bro and answer my question

Talking Footy

Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spent

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen

Re: Karmichael hunt, a wonderful 3 years and money well spen