Talking Footy

piesman2011 wrote:

the Swines were premiers in 2013

to be well behind a club that has never won a title in 47 seasons in the NRL's Sharks
also some VFL clubs that have been dry for even longer then that
shows their irrelevance in the scheme of things
plus I'd say a lot of their merchandise was purchased in Melbourne ...............

they STILL just aint that popular in their adopted home town

dave that has to be one of the dumbest things you've said on here which is saying a lot

the sharks are also above the broncos, a team that has a city of over 2 million people to themselves vs the couple hundred thousand people that live in the shire, the broncos have won multiple premierships over the last 20 odd years and play infront of 30k odd every week vs the sharks who are often lucky to play infront of a third of that, what's their excuse you pleb? lmfao!!!!!! :_<>

The swans have got a city of five million and only one AFL team (the other one is not AFL but rather blithering basketcase standard). Yet their sales are still below the sharks and on a par with four other nrl teams? Daves right, they and the AFL are just not loved by many in sydney town, comparatively to rl that is. dems just the facts folks, just the facts nothing to hAve a cup of tea and a few tears over.

sydneyfc wrote:

dave that has to be one of the dumbest things you've said on here which is saying a lot

the sharks are also above the broncos, a team that has a city of over 2 million people to themselves vs the couple hundred thousand people that live in the shire, the broncos have won multiple premierships over the last 20 odd years and play infront of 30k odd every week vs the sharks who are often lucky to play infront of a third of that, what's their excuse you pleb? lmfao!!!!!! :_<>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

the Broncos in premiership year would triple that Sharks figure you bouncing fucktard & quadruple the Swines one
that Swines figure considering they won the comp in 2012
is
pathetic

they are irrelevant in Sydney
end of

King-Eliagh wrote:

The swans have got a city of five million and only one AFL team (the other one is not AFL but rather blithering basketcase standard). Yet their sales are still below the sharks and on a par with four other nrl teams? Daves right, they and the AFL are just not loved by many in sydney town, comparatively to rl that is. dems just the facts folks, just the facts nothing to hAve a cup of tea and a few tears over.

Are you making a statement or asking a question? Either way work on your maths. The swans made almost 1 million from sales almost double Manly, triple Penrith and five times more than Canterbury. The only NSW club which is close to par is Parra.

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

the Swines were premiers in 2013

to be well behind a club that has never won a title in 47 seasons in the NRL's Sharks
also some VFL clubs that have been dry for even longer then that
shows their irrelevance in the scheme of things
plus I'd say a lot of their merchandise was purchased in Melbourne ...............

they STILL just aint that popular in their adopted home town

the chart is another indication in the size difference between the AFL and NRL clubs.
Hawthorn 3.7 million
Essendon 3.2 million & they didn't even play in the finals series

NRL top 2
sharks 1.3 million
broncos 1.3 million


again showing how minnow the NRL clubs are compared to the AFL clubs

leagueiscrap wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

the Swines were premiers in 2013

to be well behind a club that has never won a title in 47 seasons in the NRL's Sharks
also some VFL clubs that have been dry for even longer then that
shows their irrelevance in the scheme of things
plus I'd say a lot of their merchandise was purchased in Melbourne ...............

they STILL just aint that popular in their adopted home town

the chart is another indication in the size difference between the AFL and NRL clubs.
Hawthorn 3.7 million
Essendon 3.2 million & they didn't even play in the finals series

NRL top 2
sharks 1.3 million
broncos 1.3 million


again showing how minnow the NRL clubs are compared to the AFL clubs

Hmmmm

Top earning NRL club
Penith at 148 million

Top derps n oopsies club
Collingthorn at half that amount

How do ya like them apples you lying *****

Raiderdave wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

the Swines were premiers in 2013

to be well behind a club that has never won a title in 47 seasons in the NRL's Sharks
also some VFL clubs that have been dry for even longer then that
shows their irrelevance in the scheme of things
plus I'd say a lot of their merchandise was purchased in Melbourne ...............

they STILL just aint that popular in their adopted home town

the chart is another indication in the size difference between the AFL and NRL clubs.
Hawthorn 3.7 million
Essendon 3.2 million & they didn't even play in the finals series

NRL top 2
sharks 1.3 million
broncos 1.3 million


again showing how minnow the NRL clubs are compared to the AFL clubs

Hmmmm

Top earning NRL club
Penith at 148 million

Top derps n oopsies club
Collingthorn at half that amount

How do ya like them apples you lying *****

so we need to go over this again 341,000 in merchandise compared to 3.7 million from hawthorn and 3.2 million from Essendon


so with your claim of 148 million
the penrith panther poke group made
the NRL club made 9.1 million from NRL related activities
6.8 from the NRL distrubutions
pinched 4 million out of its trust fund because the club couldnt come up with the rest needed to run the club
gee where did the rest of the other money come from :D
POKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


wow what a power house 70 odd million in debt, on money loaned to them from gus guild managed to borrow off pack.

thanks dave for only proving again how minnow and shit the NRL clubs are compared to the AFL clubs

Yep - pissy pants Dave just doesn't get it - Swanies still the numbers one club in Sydney!!!!

One of the major differences between the AFL clubs and the NRL clubs is that the AFL clubs own their pokie machines (hopefully they can dump them soon). However some NRL clubs are owned by the pokie machine operators. Now that the NRL has money its time to fix this.

piesman2011 wrote:

One of the major differences between the AFL clubs and the NRL clubs is that the AFL clubs own their pokie machines (hopefully they can dump them soon). However some NRL clubs are owned by the pokie machine operators. Now that the NRL has money its time to fix this.

the AFL owns the licences for all of the AFL clubs now days because they have the money. the clubs are slowly buying in to the pokes for another source of income
the NRL clubs are owned by poke operators/leagues clubs and the wealthy idiot business men like nathan tinkler. who by NRL clubs to use the brand name & tax dodges.

the NRL is far more advanced than the AFL in poke ownership as the NRL clubs have pathetically low earning capacities compared to the AFL clubs

piesman2011 wrote:

One of the major differences between the AFL clubs and the NRL clubs is that the AFL clubs own their pokie machines (hopefully they can dump them soon). However some NRL clubs are owned by the pokie machine operators. Now that the NRL has money its time to fix this.

Tell me how any of these pokie palaces owns an NRL club

Hmmmm, I wonder how many Parra games on a friday night we would need to outrate the whole season from the swans shown in Sydney?

You reckon it would be 1 or 2 games max?

Couldn't be no more, they only average around 50k a week

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Hmmmm, I wonder how many Parra games on a friday night we would need to outrate the whole season from the swans shown in Sydney?

You reckon it would be 1 or 2 games max?

Couldn't be no more, they only average around 50k a week

70k plus foxtel, so around 100k per home game.