Talking Footy

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

the picture he showed was of the end of the ground with the upper level, and had literally no one there. It was obviously a different game. The video I posted was of the same stand and showed there was about 1 in 3 seats filled in that area.

AFLc is a proven liar, and you're a compulsive liar and fukin idiot

1 in 3

try 1 in 33 you fuckwit :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

So you're claiming the video is the same as the picture AFLc posted?

Im claiming vision I just saw on the news

1 in 33
& that's being generous dipshit

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

the picture he showed was of the end of the ground with the upper level, and had literally no one there. It was obviously a different game. The video I posted was of the same stand and showed there was about 1 in 3 seats filled in that area.

AFLc is a proven liar, and you're a compulsive liar and fukin idiot

1 in 3

try 1 in 33 you fuckwit :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

So you're claiming the video is the same as the picture AFLc posted?

Im claiming vision I just saw on the news

1 in 33
& that's being generous dipshit

And the game I watched was the same as the video I posted, and taking the entire ground into account would have easily been 7k

Good to see you agree AFLc is a liar

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

the picture he showed was of the end of the ground with the upper level, and had literally no one there. It was obviously a different game. The video I posted was of the same stand and showed there was about 1 in 3 seats filled in that area.

AFLc is a proven liar, and you're a compulsive liar and fukin idiot

1 in 3

try 1 in 33 you fuckwit :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

So you're claiming the video is the same as the picture AFLc posted?

Im claiming vision I just saw on the news

1 in 33
& that's being generous dipshit

And the game I watched was the same as the video I posted, and taking the entire ground into account would have easily been 7k

:_<> :_<> :_<>
the easter bunny wants his fairy tales back dickhead

crowd 2500
end of

about the same as the raiders then

next you'll claim the crowds in Adelaide, Perth, SCG and Melbourne are fudged

NlolRL wrote:

about the same as the raiders then

:_<> :_<>
no cockhead

the Same as the Wanderers Chicks side

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

about the same as the raiders then

:_<> :_<>
no cockhead

the Same as the Wanderers Chicks side

No, probably more than the raiders. Certainly more than the titans.

Shame the Suns are smashing the titans in crowds hey? The Giants will also rise in crowds once they start winning regularly. Then they will well and truly eclipse the raiders

Wow, just wow

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

about the same as the raiders then

:_<> :_<>
no cockhead

the Same as the Wanderers Chicks side

No, probably more than the raiders. Certainly more than the titans.

The Giants will also rise in crowds once they start winning regularly.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

probably
from 2500 to 3500

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

about the same as the raiders then

:_<> :_<>
no cockhead

the Same as the Wanderers Chicks side

No, probably more than the raiders. Certainly more than the titans.

The Giants will also rise in crowds once they start winning regularly.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

probably
from 2500 to 3500

I love how you ignore EVERY point that shows the NRL is a distant second. Not only dont you discuss the point, you simply ignore it was ever raised

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

about the same as the raiders then

:_<> :_<>
no cockhead

the Same as the Wanderers Chicks side

No, probably more than the raiders. Certainly more than the titans.

The Giants will also rise in crowds once they start winning regularly.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

probably
from 2500 to 3500

I love how you ignore EVERY point that shows the NRL is a distant second. Not only dont you discuss the point, you simply ignore it was ever raised

I love how you
& most fumblers
ignore reality ..... you're shown an empty stadium ... yet see fans everywhere >



:>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>::


deluded bubble dwelling fucktards the lot of yuz

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

about the same as the raiders then

:_<> :_<>
no cockhead

the Same as the Wanderers Chicks side

No, probably more than the raiders. Certainly more than the titans.

The Giants will also rise in crowds once they start winning regularly.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

probably
from 2500 to 3500

I love how you ignore EVERY point that shows the NRL is a distant second. Not only dont you discuss the point, you simply ignore it was ever raised

I love how you
& most fumblers
ignore reality ..... you're shown an empty stadium ... yet see fans everywhere >



:>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>::


deluded bubble dwelling fucktards the lot of yuz

at least i addressed it by posting a video which showed the original picture was rubbish. I mentioned the suns/titans comparison and you just stick your head in the sand.

how quaint

NlolRL wrote:

the picture he showed was of the end of the ground with the upper level, and had literally no one there. It was obviously a different game. The video I posted was of the same stand and showed there was about 1 in 3 seats filled in that area.

AFLc is a proven liar, and you're a compulsive liar and fukin idiot

.
That pic was off twitter last night.
& how am I a proven liar.
You are claiming that 1 in 3 seats in one area were full.
One small area.
FOR there to be the number quoted at the game there has to be 1 in 3 for the whole ground.
Large large areas had No one at all.

& you call me a liar.
You are a ******.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

the picture he showed was of the end of the ground with the upper level, and had literally no one there. It was obviously a different game. The video I posted was of the same stand and showed there was about 1 in 3 seats filled in that area.

AFLc is a proven liar, and you're a compulsive liar and fukin idiot

.
That pic was off twitter last night.
& how am I a proven liar.
You are claiming that 1 in 3 seats in one area were full.
One small area.
FOR there to be the number quoted at the game there has to be 1 in 3 for the whole ground.
Large large areas had No one at all.

& you call me a liar.
You are a ******.

youre a pathetic liar. The picture you posted showed about 10 people so it obviously wasnt the actual AFL game. This was proven by the actual game video I showed demonstrating at least a thousand in the very area your picture showed as empty.

Liar!

Your mob has been shown up to be lying & you go on the attack.
Good fumble soldier .
& yes I watched the video.
& there were lucky to be 3K there.

******.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Your mob has been shown up to be lying & you go on the attack.
Good fumble soldier .
& yes I watched the video.
& there were lucky to be 3K there.

******.

The crowd is counted by the stadium managers not the AFL ******.

The photo you showed, which you claimed was the actual game attendance, showed about 10 people. Now you're saying its 3k.

Lying again I see. Give it up loser

leagueiscrap wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Parra and the tigers have hit the wall since origin began and I can't see them winning a game between them for the rest of the season.

History has that fucking habit :****

so 3 origin games will effect the parramatta poke club & tigers from winning a game for the rest of the season

Did I say Parra and the tigers have hit the wall since origin started, or because origin started?

You are dense.