Talking Footy

Cracker wrote:

I mentioned this on the Forum/Site Issues board and I'll repeat it here. That is an external look up issue, and it was misinterpreted and then corrected to the satisfaction of all except NRLCrap1. And he has firmly claimed information to confirm an issue.

It's up to him now to prove that the issue actually exists without revealing private information. He's got his back against the wall on this now because I have stated my action if he avoids the matter beyond a certain point.

As with his deluded username ramblins he also claimed I was RD's friend.
Wrong.
He also claims he knows lots about mental health facilities..that I believe.Knows them INSIDE & out.

Cracker wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

By having his private information in my email, Cracker, that's how!

That's risky talk, NRLCrap1. You are seemingly creating a situation that the false claim rule can not overcome - the restriction on private information. I know I read Beaussie state that it was not to be published and his word is law. But using this information as a smoking gun is placing this matter in a state of flux.

So with that in mind, is there anything you can say to reveal what you do have without going too far? Or should I assume that you are not telling the truth and delete the claims you are making?

I AM telling the truth! Hey meat puppet, you remember when Phelpsy revealed your real first name? And he got banned for a month for it? I'm not revealing it here, but guess what? HE GOT THAT FROM ME!! Where did I get it? From the same email that also confirms that you and Dave DO know each other!! You are both outpatients and have the same condition!!

And that's all I'm saying! If you want to call me a stalker, go ahead because it'll prove I'm RGHT!!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Cracker wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

By having his private information in my email, Cracker, that's how!

That's risky talk, NRLCrap1. You are seemingly creating a situation that the false claim rule can not overcome - the restriction on private information. I know I read Beaussie state that it was not to be published and his word is law. But using this information as a smoking gun is placing this matter in a state of flux.

So with that in mind, is there anything you can say to reveal what you do have without going too far? Or should I assume that you are not telling the truth and delete the claims you are making?

I AM telling the truth! Hey meat puppet, you remember when Phelpsy revealed your real first name? And he got banned for a month for it? I'm not revealing it here, but guess what? HE GOT THAT FROM ME!! Where did I get it? From the same email that also confirms that you and Dave DO know each other!! You are both outpatients and have the same condition!!

And that's all I'm saying! If you want to call me a stalker, go ahead because it'll prove I'm RGHT!!

,
SO by your fucked up logic
Either RD travels from Canberra to SEQ for outpatient therapy.
OR
I travel to Canberra .

One of us has problems & its not me ..

You need to re visit stalker school .
You are stalking the wrong person.

1 point

You don't have to visit each other in order to know each other, AFLcrap1. It would appear from your stalker accusation that NRLCrap1 confidently and correctly predicted that there is some truth in what he says. How much? Obviously no one can tell and will be able to tell unless NRLCrap1 breaks the rules and shows us this presumably very personal information about both Raiderdave and AFLcrap1.

There must be quite a story in that email, and behind it's receipt as well.

Cracker wrote:

You don't have to visit each other in order to know each other, AFLcrap1. It would appear from your stalker accusation that NRLCrap1 confidently and correctly predicted that there is some truth in what he says. How much? Obviously no one can tell and will be able to tell unless NRLCrap1 breaks the rules and shows us this presumably very personal information about both Raiderdave and AFLcrap1.

There must be quite a story in that email, and behind it's receipt as well.

Isnt it strange how you continually believe cwapper but dismiss what I say .

Can you show me one shred of evidence that I know RD.


Can you show me where you think its odd that some posters on here are seeking info (dumb pricks got wrong info) on another poster.

Anyone can claim to have info on another ..
In fact I have an email that states that NRL cwapper did time for molesting a goat.

see that's easy.

& what bothers me is how quickly you jump on the AFL side of things ,even when some fruitloop admits to stalking .
& you cant delete my claim .
You allow his claim on an email .
Then you allow mine.

& if you would like some facts I will tell you .
A. I don't know RD except from here & LU.
Never met ,talked or messaged.
The email im 100% sure come from a poster called James Stewert.
A bigger fruitloop than some posters on here .

He was on a FB site AFL V RL & staked plenty of RL fans .
He got booted from LU for posting personal pics & info.

He knew my name from FB,thats how the other stalkers know my name .
That's all they have right.
But it makes Cwapper feel important.

Most people couldn't give a shit about another posters name .
Only those who are losing arguments & have nothing.

SO as long as the poster who likes automated responses makes false claims about me ..I shall do the same ..
This will be a test for your Biased moderating..
Up till now its fine to make personal claims against me or Rd ..
How will it go when the goat molester gets some back?

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Cracker wrote:

You don't have to visit each other in order to know each other, AFLcrap1. It would appear from your stalker accusation that NRLCrap1 confidently and correctly predicted that there is some truth in what he says. How much? Obviously no one can tell and will be able to tell unless NRLCrap1 breaks the rules and shows us this presumably very personal information about both Raiderdave and AFLcrap1.

There must be quite a story in that email, and behind it's receipt as well.

Isnt it strange how you continually believe cwapper but dismiss what I say .

Can you show me one shred of evidence that I know RD.

Of course I can't. Don't be ridiculous. You know as well as I do that it's NRLCrap1 with the information and not me.

The situation is no win. NRLCrap1 has stated that revealing all the information will get him banned so he is doing the right thing staying quiet. There is a rule regarding privacy and it has already been stated that Phelpsy was banned for a month for it. It's all very well trying to get me to reveal something that I don't have. I think you should PM NRLCrap1 and demand the information there if you are so determined. or make a formal complaint to the administrator.

You have no trouble deleting anything anti AFL.
Yet when posters claim to have personal info on people you seem to think that's not too bad.

For everytime a so called pretend email about me gets mentioned ,I will be replying with my email about Goat molesting..( you naughty boy cwapper)

Heres a tip .
Try to mod AFL fans as much as you do RL fans ..

I just did as I responded to your report. And if you carry out that threat the post will be deleted. Take my advice and lodge a formal complaint with the administrator instead.

Cracker wrote:

You don't have to visit each other in order to know each other, AFLcrap1. It would appear from your stalker accusation that NRLCrap1 confidently and correctly predicted that there is some truth in what he says. How much? Obviously no one can tell and will be able to tell unless NRLCrap1 breaks the rules and shows us this presumably very personal information about both Raiderdave and AFLcrap1.

There must be quite a story in that email, and behind it's receipt as well.

The hilarious part about it is I wasn't going after the meat puppet at the start. I was after Dave! The rest fell into place! Yeah, they haven't met in real ife. Well when I got the email they hadn't and that was awhile ago now. Can't speak for since then.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Cracker wrote:

You don't have to visit each other in order to know each other, AFLcrap1. It would appear from your stalker accusation that NRLCrap1 confidently and correctly predicted that there is some truth in what he says. How much? Obviously no one can tell and will be able to tell unless NRLCrap1 breaks the rules and shows us this presumably very personal information about both Raiderdave and AFLcrap1.

There must be quite a story in that email, and behind it's receipt as well.

The hilarious part about it is I wasn't going after the meat puppet at the start. I was after Dave! The rest fell into place! Yeah, they haven't met in real ife. Well when I got the email they hadn't and that was awhile ago now. Can't speak for since then.

When I got the email about you ,the goat was still in therapy,
Don't know about now.

What, did NRLCrap1 feed it something it couldn't eat? That's rare because they eat anything.

Cracker wrote:

What, did NRLCrap1 feed it something it couldn't eat? That's rare because they eat anything.

Im guessing he tried to feed it something.

Well what would the problem be then?