Talking Footy

Bugger off. I'm a member and have the same rights as you. If you want someone to provide proof then simply ask, just like I do

Xman wrote:

Bugger off. I'm a member and have the same rights as you. If you want someone to provide proof then simply ask, just like I do

you're also a moderator

& like I said
if your going to ask a member to prove stuff they post .... its best you ask all members to prove stuff they post
or
in your role as moderator.. don't ask anyone !!
otherwise
the accusations of bias against you are proven as fact

if you don't like that
stop being a moderator as its clear you simply can't be moderate

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Bugger off. I'm a member and have the same rights as you. If you want someone to provide proof then simply ask, just like I do

you're also a moderator

& like I said
if your going to ask a member to prove stuff they post .... its best you ask all members to prove stuff they post
or
in your role as moderator.. don't ask anyone !!
otherwise
the accusations of bias against you are proven as fact

if you don't like that
stop being a moderator as its clear you simply can't be moderate

impossible. I can't and won't read every single post. If you have an issue with a post simply ask for proof like I and others do

Raiderdave there is a very simple solution for this, and I will cover for you just this once.

Cos789 I request proof that there was a Canberra club component in the set up of the GWS Giants.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Bugger off. I'm a member and have the same rights as you. If you want someone to provide proof then simply ask, just like I do

you're also a moderator

& like I said
if your going to ask a member to prove stuff they post .... its best you ask all members to prove stuff they post
or
in your role as moderator.. don't ask anyone !!
otherwise
the accusations of bias against you are proven as fact

if you don't like that
stop being a moderator as its clear you simply can't be moderate

impossible. I can't and won't read every single post. If you have an issue with a post simply ask for proof like I and others do

you don't need to
they are brought to your attention by members for you to action in your role as moderator under the new rules

What I have an issue with is a moderator ...............only asking particular posters to prove their posts
& completely ignoring other posts
that's a misuse of ones authority & tantamount to bias

theres no other way it could be perceived

Ok, 24hrs Cos

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Bugger off. I'm a member and have the same rights as you. If you want someone to provide proof then simply ask, just like I do

you're also a moderator

& like I said
if your going to ask a member to prove stuff they post .... its best you ask all members to prove stuff they post
or
in your role as moderator.. don't ask anyone !!
otherwise
the accusations of bias against you are proven as fact

if you don't like that
stop being a moderator as its clear you simply can't be moderate

impossible. I can't and won't read every single post. If you have an issue with a post simply ask for proof like I and others do

you don't need to
they are brought to your attention by members for you to action in your role as moderator under the new rules

What I have an issue with is a moderator ...............only asking particular posters to prove their posts
& completely ignoring other posts
that's a misuse of ones authority & tantamount to bias

theres no other way it could be perceived

Because I ask as a member and AFL fan, not as a moderator

Cracker wrote:

Raiderdave there is a very simple solution for this, and I will cover for you just this once.

Cos789 I request proof that there was a Canberra club component in the set up of the GWS Giants.

that won't cut it

we can't have the moderator picking & choosing when he is just a member
& when he is the moderator
he either asks everyone
or no one to prove their claims & leaves it to us to complain to him..

at the moment Xman off his own bat singles out RL posters only .. or at the very least mainly... to prove their claims ... while doing nothing about claims made by fumblers .... why is that ?

this is not on if you are the moderator
its a very bad look especially when he is often accused of bias

the owner of this site defends it saying it is not a pro VFL site .. it is a generic sports site where all are equal
well

that looks like a hollow claim in light of this

Suck it up Dave, this is the way it is

Xman wrote:

Suck it up Dave, this is the way it is

Well to me it doesn't matter if you made your claim about SOO being an exhibition game as a mod or AFL fan .
It is a lie .Straight out lie & you have not retracted (even after Wookie agreed that it is NOT).
Why are your lies ok but any one elses claims/lies deleted.

So once again ,show me some proof .

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Bugger off. I'm a member and have the same rights as you. If you want someone to provide proof then simply ask, just like I do

you're also a moderator

& like I said
if your going to ask a member to prove stuff they post .... its best you ask all members to prove stuff they post
or
in your role as moderator.. don't ask anyone !!
otherwise
the accusations of bias against you are proven as fact

if you don't like that
stop being a moderator as its clear you simply can't be moderate

impossible. I can't and won't read every single post. If you have an issue with a post simply ask for proof like I and others do

you don't need to
they are brought to your attention by members for you to action in your role as moderator under the new rules

What I have an issue with is a moderator ...............only asking particular posters to prove their posts
& completely ignoring other posts
that's a misuse of ones authority & tantamount to bias

theres no other way it could be perceived

Because I ask as a member and AFL fan, not as a moderator

like I said
step down then

you simply cant choose when you are one or the other >

you can't demand stuff of some members .. & not others ... whilst you are a moderator
because you enforce the rules you can't have a conflict of interest
&
you have just admitted you do

Houston
we have a problem ...........

Xman wrote:

Suck it up Dave, this is the way it is

I think its time you sucked it up as you've been exposed .............. again !!
as being biased & not having any ability to moderate

Oh Oh
I didn't ask as a moderator





>


:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

oh Ok
that's just dandy :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>::

you & this site are an embarrassment

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Suck it up Dave, this is the way it is

Well to me it doesn't matter if you made your claim about SOO being an exhibition game as a mod or AFL fan .
It is a lie .Straight out lie & you have not retracted (even after Wookie agreed that it is NOT).
Why are your lies ok but any one elses claims/lies deleted.

So once again ,show me some proof .

forget it
he will make it up as he goes

what ever suits him at the time ... apparently sometimes hes not a moderator
hes just a member
specifically when an RL poster makes a claim ... hes a member only & demands proof >
then he becomes the moderator magically & applies the rules however he sees fit >

same situation when he sees a suspect claim by a fumbler
its

:>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>:: :>::

why do we put up with him ?

Canberra is a big comonent of GWS because of the number of games they play at Canberra.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Suck it up Dave, this is the way it is

Well to me it doesn't matter if you made your claim about SOO being an exhibition game as a mod or AFL fan .
It is a lie .Straight out lie & you have not retracted (even after Wookie agreed that it is NOT).
Why are your lies ok but any one elses claims/lies deleted.

So once again ,show me some proof .

You guys keep claiming SOO is part of the NRL. If it is then IMO the SOO is an exhibition. You can't have it both ways