Page 4 of 4

Re: is it time to merge some nrl teams

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:26 am
by Swans4ever
AFLcrap1 wrote:
You deflected .
Happens a lot with you fumblers when you are shown up as clueless.
Well at least I admit when wrong never see you do that - but I suppose you have to man up to do that!!!

Re: is it time to merge some nrl teams

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 5:30 pm
by Cracker
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Cracker wrote:
No logic in building a major rugby league stadium in the wesetern suburbs.

I know you're trying to break me, Cos789. It is not going to work so I suggest you give it up.
Why, there are 4 NRL clubs alone that will use it for out west, maybe more if Souths continue playing out west, then you have the Soccer club, they'll use it, maybe a Union side one day when they get some brains.

You have no idea about the sport of RL and where any of the bloody teams are located, yet you want a 100,000 seat stadium at the SFS?

:_<>
So according to you Manly, the Roosters, Souths, the Dragons, the mighty Bulldogs and West Tigers would all be happy to play out at Parramatta or beyond.

That is delusional because the supporters of most of those clubs will not travel that far on a regular enough basis. The low crowd at Leumeah Sportsground is proof of this. Six clubs out number two, therefore Allianz is the correct location for the main venue. Not the outer western suburbs (Parramatta and Penrith).

Re: is it time to merge some nrl teams

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 5:52 pm
by cos789
Logic fail in saying SFS is more central than ANZ.