Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

214Four wrote:

WA for the last decade or so has seen massive migration from eastern states and NZ and England and just like what occurred in SE queensland from large migrant influxes from the southern states in the 80s and 90s, the new arrivals into WA will bring with them an interest in the sports they had back home and as these migrants increase the interest for RL and (RU) will grow. already in the pilbara there is 50/50 (even higher) RL to AFL interest there (from what i saw)

your last point about the Pilbara being 50/50 (even higher) RL to AFL interest there? What you may have saw when visiting is hardly proof.

but its proof enough for YOU & fumblers when they visit a pub in Sydney or Brisbane & see 3 people watching a fumbles & bumbles game
& a TV on with no one watching the NRL
:_<> :_<> :_<>

214four is quite right
& so am I about DARWIN ... thousands of easterners moving to WA to the Pilbara mining areas & they base themselves in Darwin as much as Perth these days to fly home for their week off & PNG'ers are moving in their thousands to Darwin too
&
RL is their sport , they play it... they watch it
they care little for that silly little Victorian abortion which is really only popular in the remote communities in NT these days among the indigenous population

For all those thousands of ex-pats going to WA and NT and they only have 3000 registered players both juniors and seniors! Don't forget they used to have an RL club over there until it was axed by the Sydney clubs who didn't like flying that far! Maybe for those thousands moving to WA they are trying a Sherrin, after all when in Rome. You have no evidence that this massive surge of migration is having the sort of effect you claim - another BS claim - FFS when will you RL bum sniffing types stop lying and BS-ing????

Another lie to add to the never ending list.
Why comment on something you know nothing about.

cos789 wrote:

So the nrl clubs have nothing to do with the nrl???

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

214Four wrote:

WA for the last decade or so has seen massive migration from eastern states and NZ and England and just like what occurred in SE queensland from large migrant influxes from the southern states in the 80s and 90s, the new arrivals into WA will bring with them an interest in the sports they had back home and as these migrants increase the interest for RL and (RU) will grow. already in the pilbara there is 50/50 (even higher) RL to AFL interest there (from what i saw)

your last point about the Pilbara being 50/50 (even higher) RL to AFL interest there? What you may have saw when visiting is hardly proof.

but its proof enough for YOU & fumblers when they visit a pub in Sydney or Brisbane & see 3 people watching a fumbles & bumbles game
& a TV on with no one watching the NRL
:_<> :_<> :_<>

214four is quite right
& so am I about DARWIN ... thousands of easterners moving to WA to the Pilbara mining areas & they base themselves in Darwin as much as Perth these days to fly home for their week off & PNG'ers are moving in their thousands to Darwin too
&
RL is their sport , they play it... they watch it
they care little for that silly little Victorian abortion which is really only popular in the remote communities in NT these days among the indigenous population

For all those thousands of ex-pats going to WA and NT and they only have 3000 registered players both juniors and seniors! Don't forget they used to have an RL club over there until it was axed by the Sydney clubs who didn't like flying that far! Maybe for those thousands moving to WA they are trying a Sherrin, after all when in Rome. You have no evidence that this massive surge of migration is having the sort of effect you claim - another BS claim - FFS when will you RL bum sniffing types stop lying and BS-ing????

Another lie to add to the never ending list.
Why comment on something you know nothing about.

Did the Sydney clubs complain about travelling to Perth
Did the Sydney clubs get their travel expenses paid by the Reds
Did the Sydney clubs ask that Perth be dropped when SL was over and the merge took place

Again it's there in the history books - Sydney clubs rule the NRL that's why it hasn't expanded to be a NATIONAL comp - otherwise Perth would still be there as well as Adelaide!

NRL - stands for Not guts RL!

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Well what else do you call the moron?

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Well what else do you call the moron?

come on! "******" is an unnacceptable term in anyone's language. How about "ninnie"

pussycat wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

214Four wrote:

WA for the last decade or so has seen massive migration from eastern states and NZ and England and just like what occurred in SE queensland from large migrant influxes from the southern states in the 80s and 90s, the new arrivals into WA will bring with them an interest in the sports they had back home and as these migrants increase the interest for RL and (RU) will grow. already in the pilbara there is 50/50 (even higher) RL to AFL interest there (from what i saw)

your last point about the Pilbara being 50/50 (even higher) RL to AFL interest there? What you may have saw when visiting is hardly proof.

but its proof enough for YOU & fumblers when they visit a pub in Sydney or Brisbane & see 3 people watching a fumbles & bumbles game
& a TV on with no one watching the NRL
:_<> :_<> :_<>

214four is quite right
& so am I about DARWIN ... thousands of easterners moving to WA to the Pilbara mining areas & they base themselves in Darwin as much as Perth these days to fly home for their week off & PNG'ers are moving in their thousands to Darwin too
&
RL is their sport , they play it... they watch it
they care little for that silly little Victorian abortion which is really only popular in the remote communities in NT these days among the indigenous population

For all those thousands of ex-pats going to WA and NT and they only have 3000 registered players both juniors and seniors! Don't forget they used to have an RL club over there until it was axed by the Sydney clubs who didn't like flying that far! Maybe for those thousands moving to WA they are trying a Sherrin, after all when in Rome. You have no evidence that this massive surge of migration is having the sort of effect you claim - another BS claim - FFS when will you RL bum sniffing types stop lying and BS-ing????

Another lie to add to the never ending list.
Why comment on something you know nothing about.

Did the Sydney clubs complain about travelling to Perth
Did the Sydney clubs get their travel expenses paid by the Reds
Did the Sydney clubs ask that Perth be dropped when SL was over and the merge took place

Again it's there in the history books - Sydney clubs rule the NRL that's why it hasn't expanded to be a NATIONAL comp - otherwise Perth would still be there as well as Adelaide!

NRL - stands for Not guts RL!

Do the Melbourne AFL clubs complain out the special allowances Syney clubs get ? Therefore logically , them must be responsible for the Swans being in receivership every couple of years >

AFLcrap1 wrote:

The Reds had to pay the travel costs of visiting teams.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Well what else do you call the moron?

come on! "******" is an unnacceptable term in anyone's language. How about "ninnie"

Ninnie.
Fair fucking dinkum.
Its the FIGHT CLUB.
Not the "Lets all sit around holding hands & singing KUMBAYA " Club.

pussycat wrote:

If they had to pay for travel expenses, and Im not sure that they did . But if they did it would of been part of the Reds submission to to the NRL to gain admission into the competition.