Talking Footy

pussycat wrote:

Where do you think the the NRL $50m profit comes from.

The NRL invests but they make a $50m profit.

The AFL invest but they make $ 6.7m profit

The more broken something is the more money it costs to fix it.

no its called investing for the future!
the NRL's profit was only so large due to the first year of the new broadcast rights,
David smith was a former banker, a bean counter! why wont he release the full list of spending like the AFL does?

adamj1300 wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Where do you think the the NRL $50m profit comes from.

The NRL invests but they make a $50m profit.

The AFL invest but they make $ 6.7m profit

The more broken something is the more money it costs to fix it.

the NRL's profit was only so large due to the first year of the new broadcast rights,

well this & the fact the NRL does not have half of its clubs in near insolvency
that sorta helped too don't ya think dickhead


the NRL will pop a tidy 200 Million into the bank by 2017
the VFL
a megre 35 million
its a painful reality fumblers
but its a reality you must all embrace

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Where do you think the the NRL $50m profit comes from.

The NRL invests but they make a $50m profit.

The AFL invest but they make $ 6.7m profit

The more broken something is the more money it costs to fix it.

the NRL's profit was only so large due to the first year of the new broadcast rights,

well this & the fact the NRL does not have half of its clubs in near insolvency
that sorta helped too don't ya think dickhead


the NRL will pop a tidy 200 Million into the bank by 2017
the VFL
a megre 35 million
its a painful reality fumblers
but its a reality you must all embrace

And the NRL will be keeping their money for a rainy day. The AFL already factor futures funding into their profit, and have been doing so for years.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Be surprised! Seven is winning in sport alone I'll bet!

That's highly unlikely. Nine has the cricket.

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Where do you think the the NRL $50m profit comes from.

The NRL invests but they make a $50m profit.

The AFL invest but they make $ 6.7m profit

The more broken something is the more money it costs to fix it.

the NRL's profit was only so large due to the first year of the new broadcast rights,

well this & the fact the NRL does not have half of its clubs in near insolvency
that sorta helped too don't ya think dickhead


the NRL will pop a tidy 200 Million into the bank by 2017
the VFL
a megre 35 million
its a painful reality fumblers
but its a reality you must all embrace

the NRL does after the clubs raid their poke filled league clubs for every cent they have, they then go begging and grovelling to the NRL commission for money. most AFL clubs at least have the ability to make 40 million plus before the need for poke revenue,

unlike your shittly little raiders, who cant make shit
$8,062,476 from the football department & needed to raid $18,637,576 from their poke department
http://www.raidersclub.com.au/site/file ... 199982.pdf
point of the argument, sponsors see NRL as a dead investment


so what does the NRL invest in? pokes, because it is the only thing that keeps the competition going

the AFL invests in stadiums around the country, its future fund & will own Etihad.

adamj1300 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Where do you think the the NRL $50m profit comes from.

The NRL invests but they make a $50m profit.

The AFL invest but they make $ 6.7m profit

The more broken something is the more money it costs to fix it.

the NRL's profit was only so large due to the first year of the new broadcast rights,

well this & the fact the NRL does not have half of its clubs in near insolvency
that sorta helped too don't ya think dickhead


the NRL will pop a tidy 200 Million into the bank by 2017
the VFL
a megre 35 million
its a painful reality fumblers
but its a reality you must all embrace

the NRL does after the clubs raid their poke filled league clubs for every cent they have, they then go begging and grovelling to the NRL commission for money. most AFL clubs at least have the ability to make 40 million plus before the need for poke revenue,

unlike your shittly little raiders, who cant make shit
$8,062,476 from the football department & needed to raid $18,637,576 from their poke department
http://www.raidersclub.com.au/site/file ... 199982.pdf
point of the argument, sponsors see NRL as a dead investment


so what does the NRL invest in? pokes, because it is the only thing that keeps the competition going

the AFL invests in stadiums around the country, its future fund & will own Etihad.

>

:_<> :_<> :_<>
Adamliar strikes again

that's NOT the football club you utter dribbler :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
that's not even .. half... of their club operations either

Raiders
in excess of 70 Million in revenue & their usual 3 million in profits

jesus
who could take anything this lying fuckwit posts seriously

he can't even spell pokie ..... :_<> :_<> :_<>

so what does the NRL invest in? pokes

pokes >

oh &
all VFL clubs would all fold tomorrow if they didn't have .... errrr ..... pokes ... also
you shit for brains illiterate tosser

Cracker wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Be surprised! Seven is winning in sport alone I'll bet!

That's highly unlikely. Nine has the cricket.

Oh.

Ummmmm

Have a read of the Demograhics.

http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2014/03/fri ... -2014.html

Nrl is watched massively by a young audience.
AFL not on the same page.
yet we hear how RL is dying & no new fans..& not female friendly...
Quite happy the 16-39 age group are interested

Actually they are not that interested, AFLcrap1. As I look at those figures, you are concentrating on the fact that the NRL rose to number one from number four in the higher age bracket. What you didn't notice is that the pure numbers dropped as the older viewers were skipped in the figures as the demographic came down.

However it is worth noting that the AFL didn't appear in any top five, even though that prevents any note of any similar drop, if there was one.

As an aside, it seems that the ABC have a hit with The Doctor Blake Mysteries. Good for them.

Are you fucking for real..

You can pretend all you want that you are a fan of Rl & AFL ,but whenever something positive is posted about RL ,you try to shoot it down.

I have pointed out an anomaly in your translation, and all you can do is abuse me. There is a positive in those figures for the NRL. Just not what you were trying to put over.

nah you're full of shit.

And you are not helping the cause of supporting the NRL.

Raiderdave wrote:

pookus wrote:

The big question is what channel makes the most of that revenue.And the winner is channel 7.They were the first channel ever to do that in an olympic year.Now which channel has the AFL.http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv ... 6566429251

they don't make any from VFL dickhead in NSW or QLD as no one watches the tripe in these states :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


making RL's performance even more impressive
thanks for the heads up pal

yet the AFL still makes more money out of the broadcast deal! so go figure