Talking Footy

I am assuming that crapper never read the full article or is being selective

Phelpsy wrote:

I am assuming that crapper never read the full article or is being selective

Why does it say APRIL 1 on the bottom?

The article was about a biochemist who said that looking at AFL players, some, with specific training could be Olympic level athletes. Nothing new in that, just as elite athletes in other sports could adapt their strengths into other areas. The editorial simply highlighted that at the start.

Phelpsy wrote:

The article was about a biochemist who said that looking at AFL players, some, with specific training could be Olympic level athletes. Nothing new in that, just as elite athletes in other sports could adapt their strengths into other areas. The editorial simply highlighted that at the start.

& as usual with these tories about fumblers ,there is the fantasy/delusion about how good they are or could be .
The whole point is when these Tards get out of this delusional bubble & try to compete in the real world the reality is they get smashed ...a midget ex jockey showed Dildo up..

I don't know of any other sport that has the Little man Syndrome as bad as fumbleball.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

The article was about a biochemist who said that looking at AFL players, some, with specific training could be Olympic level athletes. Nothing new in that, just as elite athletes in other sports could adapt their strengths into other areas. The editorial simply highlighted that at the start.

& as usual with these tories about fumblers ,there is the fantasy/delusion about how good they are or could be .
The whole point is when these Tards get out of this delusional bubble & try to compete in the real world the reality is they get smashed ...a midget ex jockey showed Dildo up..

I don't know of any other sport that has the Little man Syndrome as bad as fumbleball.

He came third out of 8. How is that "smashed"?

He came second in the cricket challenge, third in basketball, won the bench press, 3rd in the sprint, second in the high ball challenge, 3rd in soccer, and 3rd in boxing

Tuqiri, ex Kangaroos player, came sixth.

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

The article was about a biochemist who said that looking at AFL players, some, with specific training could be Olympic level athletes. Nothing new in that, just as elite athletes in other sports could adapt their strengths into other areas. The editorial simply highlighted that at the start.

& as usual with these tories about fumblers ,there is the fantasy/delusion about how good they are or could be .
The whole point is when these Tards get out of this delusional bubble & try to compete in the real world the reality is they get smashed ...a midget ex jockey showed Dildo up..

I don't know of any other sport that has the Little man Syndrome as bad as fumbleball.

He came third out of 8. How is that "smashed"?

He came second in the cricket challenge, third in basketball, won the bench press, 3rd in the sprint, second in the high ball challenge, 3rd in soccer, and 3rd in boxing

Tuqiri, ex Kangaroos player, came sixth.

but but but .... he'd win 8 gold medals in the Olympics >
a Fumbler told me he would easily





:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
fuckin wankers the lot of yus


how'd old Puke Dodge go ?
another fumbling super star

lapped by a lawn bowler wasn't he ?

:_<> :_<> :_<>
exposed was the fumbles & bumbles
exposed

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

The article was about a biochemist who said that looking at AFL players, some, with specific training could be Olympic level athletes. Nothing new in that, just as elite athletes in other sports could adapt their strengths into other areas. The editorial simply highlighted that at the start.

& as usual with these tories about fumblers ,there is the fantasy/delusion about how good they are or could be .
The whole point is when these Tards get out of this delusional bubble & try to compete in the real world the reality is they get smashed ...a midget ex jockey showed Dildo up..

I don't know of any other sport that has the Little man Syndrome as bad as fumbleball.

He came third out of 8. How is that "smashed"?

He came second in the cricket challenge, third in basketball, won the bench press, 3rd in the sprint, second in the high ball challenge, 3rd in soccer, and 3rd in boxing

Tuqiri, ex Kangaroos player, came sixth.

So if Usain Bolt was in the sprint he (according to fumble logic ) would have more than likely come equal 3rd.

A fumbler wins a sprint on Big fumble day against other uncos & suddenly could be an Olympian matching Bolt over 100M.

Dildo steps out of the Fumblebubble & races against others & can only manage 3rd.


Delusional Much?
You fucking betcha

Bottom line - if all the best all round athletes were available and willing to participate in this challenge, they would have filled the top places. But they weren't interested because they have their priorities right!

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

The article was about a biochemist who said that looking at AFL players, some, with specific training could be Olympic level athletes. Nothing new in that, just as elite athletes in other sports could adapt their strengths into other areas. The editorial simply highlighted that at the start.

& as usual with these tories about fumblers ,there is the fantasy/delusion about how good they are or could be .
The whole point is when these Tards get out of this delusional bubble & try to compete in the real world the reality is they get smashed ...a midget ex jockey showed Dildo up..

I don't know of any other sport that has the Little man Syndrome as bad as fumbleball.

He came third out of 8. How is that "smashed"?

He came second in the cricket challenge, third in basketball, won the bench press, 3rd in the sprint, second in the high ball challenge, 3rd in soccer, and 3rd in boxing

Tuqiri, ex Kangaroos player, came sixth.

So if Usain Bolt was in the sprint he (according to fumble logic ) would have more than likely come equal 3rd.

A fumbler wins a sprint on Big fumble day against other uncos & suddenly could be an Olympian matching Bolt over 100M.

Dildo steps out of the Fumblebubble & races against others & can only manage 3rd.


Delusional Much?
You fucking betcha

No, that's according to youre deluded logic where you believe AFL supporters claimed Deledio would beat Usain Bolt :_<>

Where you get this idiotic notion that AFL fans believe every single AFL player is a world beater is beyond me. Its hysterical actually

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Bottom line - if all the best all round athletes were available and willing to participate in this challenge, they would have filled the top places. But they weren't interested because they have their priorities right!

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Shannon Eckstein is an Iron man you shit for brains
how much more .. all round ... are there >

:_<> :_<> :_<>

the fucking dumbness of fumblers
its a phenomenon

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

The article was about a biochemist who said that looking at AFL players, some, with specific training could be Olympic level athletes. Nothing new in that, just as elite athletes in other sports could adapt their strengths into other areas. The editorial simply highlighted that at the start.

& as usual with these tories about fumblers ,there is the fantasy/delusion about how good they are or could be .
The whole point is when these Tards get out of this delusional bubble & try to compete in the real world the reality is they get smashed ...a midget ex jockey showed Dildo up..

I don't know of any other sport that has the Little man Syndrome as bad as fumbleball.

He came third out of 8. How is that "smashed"?

He came second in the cricket challenge, third in basketball, won the bench press, 3rd in the sprint, second in the high ball challenge, 3rd in soccer, and 3rd in boxing

Tuqiri, ex Kangaroos player, came sixth.

So if Usain Bolt was in the sprint he (according to fumble logic ) would have more than likely come equal 3rd.

A fumbler wins a sprint on Big fumble day against other uncos & suddenly could be an Olympian matching Bolt over 100M.

Dildo steps out of the Fumblebubble & races against others & can only manage 3rd.


Delusional Much?
You fucking betcha

No, that's according to youre deluded logic where you believe AFL supporters claimed Deledio would beat Usain Bolt :_<>

Where you get this idiotic notion that AFL fans believe every single AFL player is a world beater is beyond me. Its hysterical actually

5 seconds in big foody .... & you see very quickly that this is exactly what 99% of fumblers would have believed this as gospel
big loony is a great window into the mind set of the biggest pack of wankers on the planet

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

The article was about a biochemist who said that looking at AFL players, some, with specific training could be Olympic level athletes. Nothing new in that, just as elite athletes in other sports could adapt their strengths into other areas. The editorial simply highlighted that at the start.

& as usual with these tories about fumblers ,there is the fantasy/delusion about how good they are or could be .
The whole point is when these Tards get out of this delusional bubble & try to compete in the real world the reality is they get smashed ...a midget ex jockey showed Dildo up..

I don't know of any other sport that has the Little man Syndrome as bad as fumbleball.

He came third out of 8. How is that "smashed"?

He came second in the cricket challenge, third in basketball, won the bench press, 3rd in the sprint, second in the high ball challenge, 3rd in soccer, and 3rd in boxing

Tuqiri, ex Kangaroos player, came sixth.

So if Usain Bolt was in the sprint he (according to fumble logic ) would have more than likely come equal 3rd.

A fumbler wins a sprint on Big fumble day against other uncos & suddenly could be an Olympian matching Bolt over 100M.

Dildo steps out of the Fumblebubble & races against others & can only manage 3rd.


Delusional Much?
You fucking betcha

No, that's according to youre deluded logic where you believe AFL supporters claimed Deledio would beat Usain Bolt :_<>

Where you get this idiotic notion that AFL fans believe every single AFL player is a world beater is beyond me. Its hysterical actually

5 seconds in big foody .... & you see very quickly that this is exactly what 99% of fumblers would have believed this as gospel
big loony is a great window into the mind set of the biggest pack of wankers on the planet

prove it

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Bottom line - if all the best all round athletes were available and willing to participate in this challenge, they would have filled the top places. But they weren't interested because they have their priorities right!

Sure they would have .
All we can go on is the results.
& a midget ex jockey RL player flogged the Fumblederper.


If GI was in there ,you could have sent whoever you wanted ...
Same result.

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

The article was about a biochemist who said that looking at AFL players, some, with specific training could be Olympic level athletes. Nothing new in that, just as elite athletes in other sports could adapt their strengths into other areas. The editorial simply highlighted that at the start.

& as usual with these tories about fumblers ,there is the fantasy/delusion about how good they are or could be .
The whole point is when these Tards get out of this delusional bubble & try to compete in the real world the reality is they get smashed ...a midget ex jockey showed Dildo up..

I don't know of any other sport that has the Little man Syndrome as bad as fumbleball.

He came third out of 8. How is that "smashed"?

He came second in the cricket challenge, third in basketball, won the bench press, 3rd in the sprint, second in the high ball challenge, 3rd in soccer, and 3rd in boxing

Tuqiri, ex Kangaroos player, came sixth.

So if Usain Bolt was in the sprint he (according to fumble logic ) would have more than likely come equal 3rd.

A fumbler wins a sprint on Big fumble day against other uncos & suddenly could be an Olympian matching Bolt over 100M.

Dildo steps out of the Fumblebubble & races against others & can only manage 3rd.


Delusional Much?
You fucking betcha

No, that's according to youre deluded logic where you believe AFL supporters claimed Deledio would beat Usain Bolt :_<>

Where you get this idiotic notion that AFL fans believe every single AFL player is a world beater is beyond me. Its hysterical actually

Show me any other sport where the fans are deluded as you tards.

The bizzare threads on BF such as put together a team of AFL players & get them trained in (insert sport here) & they would beat any team...
There was even a thread a few yrs ago about how fumblers could easily play NFL but NFL players couldn't play Fumbles.
The same for soccer ,RL .
Then there is outright lying sites like WFN
& its not just the fans its the media as well .
as witnessed above.

Afew yrs ago some Fumblederp journo claimed that a fumbleteam could take on the QLD SOO at a game of RL & beat them.

It happens a the time with your sport,Yet you dismiss it
Show me any other sport that makes these stupid claims.

Very very insecure....look at us look at us attitude

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

The article was about a biochemist who said that looking at AFL players, some, with specific training could be Olympic level athletes. Nothing new in that, just as elite athletes in other sports could adapt their strengths into other areas. The editorial simply highlighted that at the start.

& as usual with these tories about fumblers ,there is the fantasy/delusion about how good they are or could be .
The whole point is when these Tards get out of this delusional bubble & try to compete in the real world the reality is they get smashed ...a midget ex jockey showed Dildo up..

I don't know of any other sport that has the Little man Syndrome as bad as fumbleball.

He came third out of 8. How is that "smashed"?

He came second in the cricket challenge, third in basketball, won the bench press, 3rd in the sprint, second in the high ball challenge, 3rd in soccer, and 3rd in boxing

Tuqiri, ex Kangaroos player, came sixth.

So if Usain Bolt was in the sprint he (according to fumble logic ) would have more than likely come equal 3rd.

A fumbler wins a sprint on Big fumble day against other uncos & suddenly could be an Olympian matching Bolt over 100M.

Dildo steps out of the Fumblebubble & races against others & can only manage 3rd.


Delusional Much?
You fucking betcha

No, that's according to youre deluded logic where you believe AFL supporters claimed Deledio would beat Usain Bolt :_<>

Where you get this idiotic notion that AFL fans believe every single AFL player is a world beater is beyond me. Its hysterical actually

Show me any other sport where the fans are deluded as you tards.

The bizzare threads on BF such as put together a team of AFL players & get them trained in (insert sport here) & they would beat any team...
There was even a thread a few yrs ago about how fumblers could easily play NFL but NFL players couldn't play Fumbles.
The same for soccer ,RL .
Then there is outright lying sites like WFN
& its not just the fans its the media as well .
as witnessed above.

Afew yrs ago some Fumblederp journo claimed that a fumbleteam could take on the QLD SOO at a game of RL & beat them.

It happens a the time with your sport,Yet you dismiss it
Show me any other sport that makes these stupid claims.

Very very insecure....look at us look at us attitude

How about showing me these threads!

You've already claimed AFL fans believe it has substantial international presence, yet when I showed you a few deserted threads on that topic, with the vast majority disagreeing, you mysteriously ignored it...

Show us some threads FFs!