Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Because you are posting non sensical gibberish bout HYBRID games.
The success of this has a few of you Fumblers rattled.

100k attendance for an entire competition is hardly a raging success. Maybe it is compared to your expectations, which are understandably low

Hows the Derpball crowds In another country...

one would have to know what derpball is in another country first
& sadly for them

the rest of that sentence is not required :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

69 countries know what it is, Dave! And you can't stand that FACT!!

Wow look at the NRL fans jump all over this as though it's nirvana. It's in New Zealand! Wonder what the sales would have been if it had been in Sydney? Hmmmmmmm!

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Yep, seriously worried about how the game can possibly expand into.....NZ.....lol

Oh and, if we compare NZ crowds per game, the 9s will get 3k per game, the AFL last year drew 10 times that.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

22,795 .... is
ten times 3,000 is it ?
& lets just turn a blind eye to less then half of them actually paying to get in.... & almost all of the rest .. ****'s from Melbourne

I think you got confused with the NRL attendance at the same venue in NZ a week later that did get over 30,000
all of them
paying Kiwis .... just like 95% of the 100K at the 9's will be too

yes
green with envy are our fumblers
their tiny tiny sport exposed as irrelevant in 99.9% of the planet :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

So more than 7 times per game. That makes it so much better....

100K

stadium chockers on both days
in a foreign country

sports played in Australia that can achieve this

Cricket
Rugby
soccer
Rugby League


anyone else ?



no

no one .............

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>



embrace your puniness Fumblers
your being nothing but a spec .... away from the sthn parts of this nation

the fact your bumbling sport is in reality ............ a joke

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Because you are posting non sensical gibberish bout HYBRID games.
The success of this has a few of you Fumblers rattled.

100k attendance for an entire competition is hardly a raging success. Maybe it is compared to your expectations, which are understandably low

Hows the Derpball crowds In another country...

one would have to know what derpball is in another country first
& sadly for them

the rest of that sentence is not required :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

69 countries know what it is, Dave! And you can't stand that FACT!!

!

a fact
according to wikiderpia you fucktard :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

no other proof
except lies from the ministry of Bull Shit .... the VFL :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

again just in case you missed it
the worlds tiniest sport
tis the Fumbles & Bumbles

embrace your puniness fumblers
wear it like a badge of honour ...... tiny.. oh so tiny

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Yep, seriously worried about how the game can possibly expand into.....NZ.....lol

Oh and, if we compare NZ crowds per game, the 9s will get 3k per game, the AFL last year drew 10 times that.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

22,795 .... is
ten times 3,000 is it ?
& lets just turn a blind eye to less then half of them actually paying to get in.... & almost all of the rest .. ****'s from Melbourne

I think you got confused with the NRL attendance at the same venue in NZ a week later that did get over 30,000
all of them
paying Kiwis .... just like 95% of the 100K at the 9's will be too

yes
green with envy are our fumblers
their tiny tiny sport exposed as irrelevant in 99.9% of the planet :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

So more than 7 times per game. That makes it so much better....

It is a different format.
Shortened games ,not 1 game.
Clutching at straws.
SMELL the Fear.

its meltdown central in here today
poor old fumblers

when things like this occur it again shows them how far their silly little Victorian game has come in the last 100 plus years

which is nowhere :_<> :_<> :_<>

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Yep, seriously worried about how the game can possibly expand into.....NZ.....lol

Oh and, if we compare NZ crowds per game, the 9s will get 3k per game, the AFL last year drew 10 times that.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

22,795 .... is
ten times 3,000 is it ?
& lets just turn a blind eye to less then half of them actually paying to get in.... & almost all of the rest .. ****'s from Melbourne

I think you got confused with the NRL attendance at the same venue in NZ a week later that did get over 30,000
all of them
paying Kiwis .... just like 95% of the 100K at the 9's will be too

yes
green with envy are our fumblers
their tiny tiny sport exposed as irrelevant in 99.9% of the planet :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

So more than 7 times per game. That makes it so much better....

It is a different format.
Shortened games ,not 1 game.
Clutching at straws.
SMELL the Fear.

Simply using failed Dave's logic against him

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Yep, seriously worried about how the game can possibly expand into.....NZ.....lol

Oh and, if we compare NZ crowds per game, the 9s will get 3k per game, the AFL last year drew 10 times that.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

22,795 .... is
ten times 3,000 is it ?
& lets just turn a blind eye to less then half of them actually paying to get in.... & almost all of the rest .. ****'s from Melbourne

I think you got confused with the NRL attendance at the same venue in NZ a week later that did get over 30,000
all of them
paying Kiwis .... just like 95% of the 100K at the 9's will be too

yes
green with envy are our fumblers
their tiny tiny sport exposed as irrelevant in 99.9% of the planet :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

So more than 7 times per game. That makes it so much better....

It is a different format.
Shortened games ,not 1 game.
Clutching at straws.
SMELL the Fear.

Simply using failed Dave's logic against him

ahhhhhhh >
that's your logic you dribbling fuckwit

31 games equals 3K a game .... remember you utter wanker ? :_<> :_<> :_<>

Youre the one who first claimed the AFL crowds were divided by games

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Because you are posting non sensical gibberish bout HYBRID games.
The success of this has a few of you Fumblers rattled.

100k attendance for an entire competition is hardly a raging success. Maybe it is compared to your expectations, which are understandably low

Hows the Derpball crowds In another country...

one would have to know what derpball is in another country first
& sadly for them

the rest of that sentence is not required :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

69 countries know what it is, Dave! And you can't stand that FACT!!

!

a fact
according to wikiderpia you fucktard :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

And the sources Wikipedia relied upon, goose!

Time to rise above your fantasy world.......

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Because you are posting non sensical gibberish bout HYBRID games.
The success of this has a few of you Fumblers rattled.

100k attendance for an entire competition is hardly a raging success. Maybe it is compared to your expectations, which are understandably low

Hows the Derpball crowds In another country...

one would have to know what derpball is in another country first
& sadly for them

the rest of that sentence is not required :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

69 countries know what it is, Dave! And you can't stand that FACT!!

!

a fact
according to wikiderpia you fucktard :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

And the sources Wikipedia relied upon, goose!
......

a fucktard like you could be a source for Wikitardia .... which is why no one trusts it

the VFL
just about non existent outside of Australia
a fact

this dividing by games, and minutes is ******. Every game is attended by 45-50k people in reality. Just like if you look at Big Day Out you go, "oh this many thousand turned up" not "there were 25 concerts so we divide it by the total attendance"

it's 100k for the two days which is fantastic and it is literally impossible for us to get any more at ANY STADIUM IN NZ as we sold out the biggest one there.

i dont know anything about this NAB Cup, but when they can get 50k rocking up to one venue in A FOREIGN COUNTRY in one day then talk to me

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Because you are posting non sensical gibberish bout HYBRID games.
The success of this has a few of you Fumblers rattled.

100k attendance for an entire competition is hardly a raging success. Maybe it is compared to your expectations, which are understandably low

Hows the Derpball crowds In another country...

one would have to know what derpball is in another country first
& sadly for them

the rest of that sentence is not required :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

69 countries know what it is, Dave! And you can't stand that FACT!!

!

a fact
according to wikiderpia you fucktard :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

And the sources Wikipedia relied upon, goose!
......

a fucktard like you could be a source for Wikitardia .... which is why no one trusts it

the VFL
just about non existent outside of Australia
a fact

Fiction. And you can't stand that.

pHyR3 wrote:

i dont know anything about this NAB Cup, but when they can get 50k rocking up to one venue in A FOREIGN COUNTRY in one day then talk to me

foreign countries eh
well lets look at where this has occurred for the 2 sports ( record crowd in brackets )

Rugby League

London ( 101,536 1966)
Manchester ( 75,122 2004)
Auckland ( 50,000 2014)
Edinburgh ( 67,748 1999)
Cardiff ( 74,356 2004)
Bradford ( 102,569 1954)



Fumbles & Bumbles





































>




:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Meanwhile back at the home of both sports - where it REALLY matters;

Highest
AFL: 121,696 (1970) - of more than 20 crowds of 100K or more!
NRL: 107,999 (1999) - of only two 100K+ crowds (and the second was a double header!)
Average
AFL: 25,778 (1921-2013)
NRL: 12,913 (1957-2013)

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Meanwhile back at the home of both sports - where it REALLY matters;

Highest
AFL: 121,696 (1970) - of more than 20 crowds of 100K or more!
NRL: 107,999 (1999) - of only two 100K+ crowds (and the second was a double header!)
Average
AFL: 25,778 (1921-2013)
NRL: 12,913 (1957-2013)

well RL has only had a venue in its main heartland city that could hold 100K plus .. for just 2 years
1999 & 2000
it would also have recorded at least 20 100K crowds for Grand Finals & test matches against the poms over the years since 1908

also
all 20 for the fumbles & bumbles ........... in the one city
infact this one horse town of a code has only had 1 city record all its crowds above 73K :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

the 4 100K plus for RL
in .... 3 different cities
& its crowds of over 73K... in at least 10 different cities

VFL..the pure definition .......... of a one trick pony :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

That's interesting crapper, imagine that average if wa and sa had bigger stadiums ???