Talking Footy

You are the deluded one and don't have the instinct to realise the real truth of the world, Fyiar. I function fine in day to day life. It's you who has the issues, being stuck in this alternative reality you insist is real. The yellow pages will have a section on medical help I'm sure.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

You are the deluded one and don't have the instinct to realise the real truth of the world, Fyiar. I function fine in day to day life. It's you who has the issues, being stuck in this alternative reality you insist is real. The yellow pages will have a section on medical help I'm sure.

Xman wrote:

Dave, you claimed 60k went to watch the England v NZ game and 7k to the Australia game. Disappointing crowd when an AFL exhibition game got more fans. :_<>

I said 60K English & 7K aussies were in attendance for the RLWC semi's
tremendous turnout for our game

I also asked you
how many aussies would watch a fumbles n bumbles game between Australia n Fiji in London
7,000 ?

more like 7 :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

that's what we call .. perspective folks

Xman wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Dave, you claimed 60k went to watch the England v NZ game and 7k to the Australia game. Disappointing crowd when an AFL exhibition game got more fans. :_<>

where did an AFL exhibition get more fans??

I dunno what RD is on about but 67,000 turned up for 2 games. Some for both, some for 1.

Same thing happens with music festivals like Big Day Out, 100k might turn up in the day and that is the figure presented. people don't go around counting how many for Band A, Band B etc. etc. cause it doesn't matter. all they care about is that they sold 100k tickets and 100k (or maybe slightly under) turned up.

Similarly, 67k for 2 games. The official statistics simply count total attendance and divide by games thereby halving this figure. It might have bee 66k NZ vs Eng, 1k Australia vs Fiji, or 40k and 27k or 33k and 34k. It simply doesn't matter.

I'm just using raiderdaves own logic against him.

well you tried to
& as per usual

failed miserably :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Your perspectives are as accurate as a drunk trying to walk a straight line, Dave.

Reality Check - Australia would NOT play Fiji in AFL anywhere, because it would be a massacre. Just like Australia shouldn't have been playing the US in your precious World Cup. They shouldn't have been anywhere near each other. It's an insult to your game and a joke to boot. Change it, or it will die.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Your perspectives are as accurate as a drunk trying to walk a straight line, Dave.

Reality Check - Australia would NOT play Fiji in AFL anywhere, .

ahhhh...........
reality check , no one should would or could .. play Australia in the fumbles n bumbles anywhere
cos its the tiniest sport on the planet :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

its a spec of dust .... :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

69 countries disagree with you, Dave!

Tell you what - have the courage to come down to Melbourne for the 2014 International Cup and you'll see true International interest!

If you have the guts that is........

NRLCrap1 wrote:

69 countries disagree with you, Dave!
........

if they disagree with me
name one of the 69 where this bumbling Victorian abortion is rated higher then .... a news story from a local news paper
a clip from a local tv station.... a shot of a crowd watching local teams ... & by a crowd .. I mean more then ten
from any of the 69
just playing the sport means zip
we all know the 69 nations are just over weight ex pat sthn aussie mindas missing their silly little embarrassment of a sport so they trot down to the local park for a bit of fumbling & bumbling in their little sisters shorts n a singlet to give our nation a bad name
don't we



feel free to post evidence of something different
otherwise

yr nothing but a deluded fumbling fuckwit

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Tell you what - have the courage to come down to Melbourne for the 2014 International Cup and you'll see true International interest!

If you have the guts that is........

ahhhhh

this bloke has a lot more skill .... & would be a lot more entertaining to watch



:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Tell you what - have the courage to come down to Melbourne for the 2014 International Cup and you'll see true International interest!

If you have the guts that is........

ahhhhh

this bloke has a lot more skill .... & would be a lot more entertaining to watch



:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

"This bloke".... Come on Dave, it's you isn't it?

No, the fire would be coming from his mouth because that's where the shit comes from.

Dave is a gutless wonder - or as TLPG put it, childish and chicken (I am so using that!).

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Tell you what - have the courage to come down to Melbourne for the 2014 International Cup and you'll see true International interest!

If you have the guts that is........

ahhhhh

this bloke has a lot more skill .... & would be a lot more entertaining to watch



:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

"This bloke".... Come on Dave, it's you isn't it?

This NUPHY really spends too much time on his PC, I hate to think what he's looking at which doesn't get posted!

Oh don't, Swans! You'll give me nightmares thinking about that one!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Oh don't, Swans! You'll give me nightmares thinking about that one!

Im sure your carer will not let the boogeyman get you

NRLCrap1 wrote:

69 countries disagree with you, Dave!

Tell you what - have the courage to come down to Melbourne for the 2014 International Cup and you'll see true International interest!

If you have the guts that is........

prove it.

any crowds to back that claim up?

participants in a tournament means shitall. RL have around 30 countries with recognised teams and another 10 or so vying to be recognised by the RLIF. some didn't make the cut for RLWC 13 (only 14 allowed) but that should be expanded to 16 in 2017.