Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

, the nrl will take the cake

twill E

twill

& I predict the fumbles & bumbles decider will be consigned to 5th ...... behind 4 Rugby Leagues games

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
how is this possible fumblers ? >

I thought your bumbling crap sport was popular ? :_<> :_<>

If it does happen, how many of the NRL games will be shown outside prime time?

do you mean will they be up against Elvis Presley in Blue Hawaii & the Leyland Brothers....... Like the VFL GF will be ?

no
THey'll be & have competed against .... big rating shows , ya know .. some actual competition :_<> :_<>
& whopped everything in their paths

If VFL fans prefer to mow their lawns or shave their Poodles Nutz then watching their codes GF
doesn't mean NRL fans would

How many of the years best rating programs are shown outside prime time?

the NRL GF's for starters
I mean
do you actually think 5pm on a Sunday is prime time ?

:_<> :_<>

also

the Olympics .... it rates very well all day long
seeing as people are interested in it..

again
If fumble bumble fans aren't interested cos they have to go to bunnings :_<> :_<>
... don't blame everyone else cockhead

The nRL GF starting at 5pm meant that it went into prime time .

:_<> :_<>
about the last ten minutes you dribbling shit for brains fuckhead :_<> :_<>

&
it'd of been up against some pretty stiff competition from about 6pm too
I mean >

how fucking dumb are these fumblers
how ... fucking ... dumb
:_<> :_<> :_<>

don't cry now

5th eh ?
yep
about where this declining sport belongs ....

6pm is when prime time starts you fucking minda!

Don't argue about things you don't know. Which I guess means everything...

Would be good if we had a reliable way of measuring ratings for regionals .

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

, the nrl will take the cake

twill E

twill

& I predict the fumbles & bumbles decider will be consigned to 5th ...... behind 4 Rugby Leagues games

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
how is this possible fumblers ? >

I thought your bumbling crap sport was popular ? :_<> :_<>

If it does happen, how many of the NRL games will be shown outside prime time?

do you mean will they be up against Elvis Presley in Blue Hawaii & the Leyland Brothers....... Like the VFL GF will be ?

no
THey'll be & have competed against .... big rating shows , ya know .. some actual competition :_<> :_<>
& whopped everything in their paths

If VFL fans prefer to mow their lawns or shave their Poodles Nutz then watching their codes GF
doesn't mean NRL fans would

How many of the years best rating programs are shown outside prime time?

the NRL GF's for starters
I mean
do you actually think 5pm on a Sunday is prime time ?

:_<> :_<>

also

the Olympics .... it rates very well all day long
seeing as people are interested in it..

again
If fumble bumble fans aren't interested cos they have to go to bunnings :_<> :_<>
... don't blame everyone else cockhead

The nRL GF starting at 5pm meant that it went into prime time .

:_<> :_<>
about the last ten minutes you dribbling shit for brains fuckhead :_<> :_<>

&
it'd of been up against some pretty stiff competition from about 6pm too
I mean >

how fucking dumb are these fumblers
how ... fucking ... dumb
:_<> :_<> :_<>

don't cry now

5th eh ?
yep
about where this declining sport belongs ....

6pm is when prime time starts you fucking minda!

-[

oh
are we up against Nigela Lawson & a cake baking lesson at that time ... like the VFL GF is when its on ?

no
we're up against the other networks News bulletins
yeah .. no one watches them eh ?

:_<> :_<> :_<>

fuck me
the dumbness ... the rampant .. outta control... dumbness :_<> :_<>

Phelpsy wrote:

Would be good if we had a reliable way of measuring ratings for regionals .

yes .... the official sources aren't much good eh
you know the ones advertisers employ to determine what merchants pay to advertise their goods


>

:_<> :_<> :_<>


now those pay ratings
the ones where people who have pay .. & obviously FTA too

are just considered to be watching both when a game of fumbles n bumbles is on

>


... hmmmm yeah ..that isn't dodgy eh ?

So much variance in regionals ... Whose added who isn't , doubling up like Gold Coast with Brisbane ... The saying ... Oh it's about 70 percent of metro etc etc . I can understand clingy to them majorly when there is nothing else to cling to ... Akin to adding in nz ratings lol ... But hey those who want to see nrl look comparable to AFL would do that I guess. If I was bias toward nrl I'd cling to the regionals and whatever else to . Be impartial, I think the best figures we have for fta is 5 city metro at this stage anyway.

So fox numbers are dodgy know lol. Seemed not long ago their figures were heralded as a clear indicator of nrl support when 77 of the top 100 shows were nrl related. I guess that's changed ?

Phelpsy wrote:

So fox numbers are dodgy know lol. Seemed not long ago their figures were heralded as a clear indicator of nrl support when 77 of the top 100 shows were nrl related. I guess that's changed ?

ahhhhhhhhh

Know

now

no ? > :_<> :_<>

lets pretend you're not an illiterate gimp for a sec

fox covers NRL exclusively
ie
they don't simulcast with FTA so theres no chance of the dodgyness that's occurring with VFL ratings

as for the regionals
broadcasters & the merchants who advertise with them seem to be fine with them weren't they ?

ya know
the biggest media rights deal in Australia being paid to the NRL largely as a result of them being satisfied that they were accurate


:_<> :_<>
can someone lend this wanker 20c so he can purchase a clue :_<> :_<>

Can someone please the address the inaccuracies. Or should we not bother as ... Well ... It's only Dave ?

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Would be good if we had a reliable way of measuring ratings for regionals .

yes .... the official sources aren't much good eh
you know the ones advertisers employ to determine what merchants pay to advertise their goods


>

:_<> :_<> :_<>


now those pay ratings
the ones where people who have pay .. & obviously FTA too

are just considered to be watching both when a game of fumbles n bumbles is on

>


... hmmmm yeah ..that isn't dodgy eh ?

Dave the AFL tv ratings went up over 30% when simulcasting started in 2011.......................................what those viewers all a sudden decided to watch aussie rules in 2011 out of thin air.....................

If there ever was dodgy tv ratings in sport it is all AFL................ :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

VFL should win this year unless a miracle happens, we got Manly in the GF again and they could be joined by the NRL's other biggest fake club tonight in the Roosters.

Please Newcastle, win and do a 1997 again.

Rabbits and Roosters, two biggest myths in the NRL (as support goes) everyone knows who the popular teams are.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

VFL should win this year unless a miracle happens, we got Manly in the GF again and they could be joined by the NRL's other biggest fake club tonight in the Roosters.

Please Newcastle, win and do a 1997 again.

Rabbits and Roosters, two biggest myths in the NRL (as support goes) everyone knows who the popular teams are.

well over 2 Million watched the NRL prelim final last night.... 800K in Sydney alone

but yeah
Parramatta ... Bulldogs ... Tigers & Dragons are our bigger clubs & they weren't playing last night
& yet we still snotted the VFL's prelim finals from last week in the TV ratings dept even with their dodgy pay ratings added
:_<> :_<>

how fumblers
how did this happen ? >

:_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

VFL should win this year unless a miracle happens, we got Manly in the GF again and they could be joined by the NRL's other biggest fake club tonight in the Roosters.

Please Newcastle, win and do a 1997 again.

Rabbits and Roosters, two biggest myths in the NRL (as support goes) everyone knows who the popular teams are.

well over 2 Million watched the NRL prelim final last night.... 800K in Sydney alone

but yeah
Parramatta ... Bulldogs ... Tigers & Dragons are our bigger clubs & they weren't playing last night
& yet we still snotted the VFL's prelim finals from last week in the TV ratings dept even with their dodgy pay ratings added
:_<> :_<>

how fumblers
how did this happen ? >

:_<> :_<> :_<>

Wow, big ratings again for a so so club in Souths and a much hated (but admired) Manly.

eelofwest wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Would be good if we had a reliable way of measuring ratings for regionals .

yes .... the official sources aren't much good eh
you know the ones advertisers employ to determine what merchants pay to advertise their goods


>

:_<> :_<> :_<>


now those pay ratings
the ones where people who have pay .. & obviously FTA too

are just considered to be watching both when a game of fumbles n bumbles is on

>


... hmmmm yeah ..that isn't dodgy eh ?

Dave the AFL tv ratings went up over 30% when simulcasting started in 2011.......................................what those viewers all a sudden decided to watch aussie rules in 2011 out of thin air.....................

If there ever was dodgy tv ratings in sport it is all AFL................ :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Live football on PTV and FTA for the first time.

onya raiderdave.

nrl's having a shit year this year, big whoop. Popular teams are doing shit, Wests, Dragons, Broncos, etc. they removed the biff, removed the shoulder charge and reffing has been abysmal. So TV ratings are down and crowds are slightly down. And NRL crowds will always be below AFL cause nrl is better watched at home, AFL at the ground.

But despite all that, 2 million watching a prelim final. NOT BAD.

pHyR3 wrote:

onya raiderdave.

nrl's having a shit year this year, big whoop. Popular teams are doing shit, Wests, Dragons, Broncos, etc. they removed the biff, removed the shoulder charge and reffing has been abysmal. So TV ratings are down and crowds are slightly down. And NRL crowds will always be below AFL cause nrl is better watched at home, AFL at the ground.

But despite all that, 2 million watching a prelim final. NOT BAD.

The AFL double the NRL in crowds and youre claiming this is because the NRL is a TV game...

Why don't the NRL double the AFL in ratings? If anything the AFL are ahead as well.