Talking Footy

Rabbit wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

GWS percentage 51.34
Parramatta percentage 47.67

*loudly clears throat*

heres a percentage for you fuckwit

Parra's won.... 300% more games then the midgets in 2013 :_<> :_<>

sit on that n rotate you cockhead :_<> :_<>

And yet when Parramatta lose they are being beaten by more than GWS.

So who is less competitive again?

You sit on that, kid! First one you'll have had I'll bet!

Parramatta have actually won a game

Yeah for an established club with 70 years history a fan base and well known brand - that's super!

Swans4ever wrote:

But soccer has a small area which you have to kick a round ball into a lot harder than touching a ball somewhere along 68 meter line! I think there is really starting to develop a skill gap - GWS will usually at least score!

Its pretty easy to score when your rewarded with a point even if you shot goes 20 feet wide of the goal posts. Not much skill required at all to 'score' and GWS still somehow manage to often loose by 100 or so points.

They get goals in case you didn't notice. If they only got points their percentage would be way worse!

214Four wrote:

Its pretty easy to score when your rewarded with a point even if you shot goes 20 feet wide of the goal posts. Not much skill required at all to 'score' and GWS still somehow manage to often loose by 100 or so points.

I thought you were more intelligent than that.
In Australian Football you score goals to win.
A very long time ago some smart people decided to award a point to the ball going "behind" the post as a tie breaker.
They had already been noting these "behinds" or near misses.
There are very few games where the team with less goals has won.
So few in fact, it's not worth changing the system bringing in points only when the score is tied.
In RU it is not uncommon for the team with least Trys to win.
In most football codes there is different value rewards.
In the rugbies there is Trys, penalty goals, field goals and conversions.
American Football has touchdowns, field goals, safety, conversion kick, and a little used conversion touchdown.
Gaelic Football has Overs and Unders with a 1:3 ratio.
Even in soccer some leagues use "Rogues" (the number of corner kicks) as a way of a tie-breaker.
It's a tie breaker in Australian Football and the value is so small that they had to amend the laws to prevent "safetys".

cos789 said "Even in soccer some leagues use "Rogues" (the number of corner kicks) as a way of a tie-breaker."

Thats only really introduced in amarteur soccer gala day competitions. you wont find it used in any professional league.

It's still used though, so it's a valid point.

How else do you get a result - otherwise you'll have the situation like in soccer where you have to decide matters with a penalty shoot out - in AF we have draws only in the rarest of circumstances. It's therefore a great part of the game!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

So what? They get belted by more when they lose. That means that they are less competitive! You always judge a club on their worst, not their best, when they're at that end of the ladder.

3 wins so far, come back when GWS actually get that many in their history.

Clowns.

3 wins and they still have a lower percentage than a team that hadn't won any!

Until today of course! GWS by 7 goals over Melbourne!

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

So what? They get belted by more when they lose. That means that they are less competitive! You always judge a club on their worst, not their best, when they're at that end of the ladder.

3 wins so far, come back when GWS actually get that many in their history.

Clowns.

No 7 wins in their history - you were saying - idiot!

Swans4ever wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

So what? They get belted by more when they lose. That means that they are less competitive! You always judge a club on their worst, not their best, when they're at that end of the ladder.

3 wins so far, come back when GWS actually get that many in their history.

Clowns.

No 7 wins in their history - you were saying - idiot!

7 eh ?

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

whats 3 plus ...... 1 dickhead ?




:_<> :_<>
fuck me

did this shithead even go to school :_<> :_<>

cos789 wrote:

214Four wrote:

Its pretty easy to score when your rewarded with a point even if you shot goes 20 feet wide of the goal posts. Not much skill required at all to 'score' and GWS still somehow manage to often loose by 100 or so points.

I thought you were more intelligent than that.
".

yeah
no ones ever had that problem where you're concerned :_<> :_<>

Look who's talking!

Anyone see the score at the arse Raiders game today? 68 - 4!!! That's the equivalent of a 200+ point smashing in football! LOL

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

So what? They get belted by more when they lose. That means that they are less competitive! You always judge a club on their worst, not their best, when they're at that end of the ladder.

3 wins so far, come back when GWS actually get that many in their history.

Clowns.

GWS got their third historic win a few hours after you made this statement. Not meaning to be an arse but....... I couldn't help myself.