Talking Footy

Hilarious thread. And wow, the key topic of the thread, i.e the battle of the bridge, has turned into a repetitive neurotic AFL member led natter about crowd numbers!

hilarious. The BOB is as dave puts it. A woefully contrived lie. There's nothing surer. And anyone who believes otherwise is, in one word, dumb.

End of folks, that's all she wrote.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hilarious thread. And wow, the key topic of the thread, i.e the battle of the bridge, has turned into a repetitive neurotic AFL member led natter about crowd numbers!

hilarious. The BOB is as dave puts it. A woefully contrived lie. There's nothing surer. And anyone who believes otherwise is, in one word, dumb.

End of folks, that's all she wrote.

That woefully contrived lie pulled a bigger crowd than both the WS Derby between Penrith and Parra and the GF rematch between the Bulldogs and the Storm.

Woefully contrived AFL lie that attracts 21k >>>> genuine nRL rivalries than attract 9k and 16k

It must sting that this woefully contrived lie, this one-sided smashing, drew a bigger crowd than anything your sport could muster on the weekend.

Imagine how embarrassing the crowd difference is going to be when the Swans v Giants games are actually worth seeing lol.

Drac wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hilarious thread. And wow, the key topic of the thread, i.e the battle of the bridge, has turned into a repetitive neurotic AFL member led natter about crowd numbers!

hilarious. The BOB is as dave puts it. A woefully contrived lie. There's nothing surer. And anyone who believes otherwise is, in one word, dumb.

End of folks, that's all she wrote.

That woefully contrived lie pulled a bigger crowd than both the WS Derby between Penrith and Parra and the GF rematch between the Bulldogs and the Storm.

Woefully contrived AFL lie that attracts 21k >>>> genuine nRL rivalries than attract 9k and 16k

It must sting that this woefully contrived lie, this one-sided smashing, drew a bigger crowd than anything your sport could muster on the weekend.

sting ?
the only thing that would be stinging is Sydneysiders think bumbleball is shit

100% of this cities VFL sides attracted 21K at the ground .. & about 40K on TV
33% of the cities NRL sides attracted 25K at the ground ... & ... 600K on TV

& lets not even go near ... the sport v sport match up
Origin & its 84K spectators & 1.2 Million TV veiwers in Sydney ...say Hi

it aint a contest folks
it aint a contest

What was the total AFL viewing for Sydney again ?? Not just the swans game?? And not just fta?

Drac wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hilarious thread. And wow, the key topic of the thread, i.e the battle of the bridge, has turned into a repetitive neurotic AFL member led natter about crowd numbers!

hilarious. The BOB is as dave puts it. A woefully contrived lie. There's nothing surer. And anyone who believes otherwise is, in one word, dumb.

End of folks, that's all she wrote.

That woefully contrived lie pulled a bigger crowd than both the WS Derby between Penrith and Parra and the GF rematch between the Bulldogs and the Storm.

Woefully contrived AFL lie that attracts 21k >>>> genuine nRL rivalries than attract 9k and 16k

It must sting that this woefully contrived lie, this one-sided smashing, drew a bigger crowd than anything your sport could muster on the weekend.

Imagine how embarrassing the crowd difference is going to be when the Swans v Giants games are actually worth seeing lol.

:_<> Did i say repetitive much?

How's about we talk about actual total interest in the game ie televised viewers added to crowd numbers?

Get back to the crowds thread drac :_<>

Phelpsy wrote:

What was the total AFL viewing for Sydney again ?? Not just the swans game?? And not just fta?

hmmmm
not real sure

although ... I heard play school wiped the floor with the fumblers in Sydney

Yes, yes. I heard the same

Making things up yet again Dave . God I hope you haven't children !!

Phelpsy wrote:

Making things up yet again Dave . God I hope you haven't children !!

god you hope I haven't children ??

ahhhhhhhhh >


:_<> :_<>

English
try it some time

I think you'll find that's fine Dave ?

Phelpsy wrote:

I think you'll find that's fine Dave ?

for a blithering fuckstick maybe

Takes one to know one Dave !!!

I hope Dave "Allen" doesn't have children either!

Unfortunately I think he has........can that be considered being child abuse!

Oh GEEEEEEZZZZZZ!!!! Poor poor kids!!!! Someone call welfare, quick!!!!