Talking Footy

Judge Judy wrote:

And we are still waiting for evidence of your claim to 250 incidents of racial abuse. 4 in a month does not add up to this.

No, you're right, it certainly doesn't add up to 250 Judge Judy. Dave I'm with Judy on this one. Please provide a reference for your 250 or kindly rescind your statement.

I think you've seriously under counted and estimated just how much racism is in this code. 4 incidents per month is probably underdoing it, but even if 4 per month was accurate you gotta recognise this would add up to much much more than 250. The comps been going on foR approx. 120 years dave, So 6000 would be your minimum mate.

That also requires verification, King Eliagh. At present, the number proven lies at 4 and only 4.

This is why, despite your begging to be, that you're not moderator lol

A narcissist like yourself would love that power ... Your profile is so typical of supposed superiority , desperate to prove it and to have power over to do so. Powers important to you isn't KE ... What other avenue do you to pursue to exert power over people , to feel superior???

Judge J wrote:

That also requires verification, King Eliagh. At present, the number proven lies at 4 and only 4.

Its in the thousands my dear Judy, the thousands. That's just common sense my friend.

And next time you see TLPG can you call him on back? I miss him.

Common sense is not evidence. Provide evidence.

Who is TLPG?

Judge J wrote:

That also requires verification, King Eliagh. At present, the number proven lies at 4 and only 4.

what the F are you talking about you blithering tool

the 4 I have cited
Goodes 2 V Collinsdildo
Goodes I V Whoresareusathorne
Daw V ...... ahhhh another pack of bumbling clowns

all reported
all verified

give youself an uppercut dickhead

Phelpsy wrote:

A narcissist like yourself would love that power ... Your profile is so typical of supposed superiority , desperate to prove it and to have power over to do so. Powers important to you isn't KE ... What other avenue do you to pursue to exert power over people , to feel superior???

hes the only bloke I respect on these pages
eels is a good bloke too
rabbits is a hoot
pussycat a great orator & debater


but he'd be the only chap on these pages who could control the bain of yours & all fumblers on these pages existence

ol Raider

Bearsy
make it happen ...... NOW !!

Raiderdave wrote:

Judge J wrote:

That also requires verification, King Eliagh. At present, the number proven lies at 4 and only 4.

what the F are you talking about you blithering tool

the 4 I have cited
Goodes 2 V Collinsdildo
Goodes I V Whoresareusathorne
Daw V ...... ahhhh another pack of bumbling clowns

all reported
all verified

give youself an uppercut dickhead

Nice try. Goodes V hawthorn? Surely you read don't you? Oh that's right your a troll I forgot for a minute.

Raider Dave I am referring to the 250 instances you claimed, not the 4 that have been verified.

And you will moderate your language when addressing me.

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Judge J wrote:

That also requires verification, King Eliagh. At present, the number proven lies at 4 and only 4.

what the F are you talking about you blithering tool

the 4 I have cited
Goodes 2 V Collinsdildo
Goodes I V Whoresareusathorne
Daw V ...... ahhhh another pack of bumbling clowns

all reported
all verified

give youself an uppercut dickhead

Nice try. Goodes V hawthorn? Surely you read don't you? Oh that's right your a troll I forgot for a minute.

you blithering cock
NewsletterRSSShare.288171-tlsnewslandscape


The Swans approached the AFL just two weeks ago after Goodes was abused at the same venue in his side's 37-point loss to Hawthorn in round seven

Judge J wrote:

Raider Dave I am referring to the 250 instances you claimed, not the 4 that have been verified.

And you will moderate your language when addressing me.

hmmm
maybe you can translate this into English then ?

Judge J wrote:. At present, the number proven lies at 4 and only 4.

FMD
how dumb

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Judge J wrote:

That also requires verification, King Eliagh. At present, the number proven lies at 4 and only 4.

what the F are you talking about you blithering tool

the 4 I have cited
Goodes 2 V Collinsdildo
Goodes I V Whoresareusathorne
Daw V ...... ahhhh another pack of bumbling clowns

all reported
all verified

give youself an uppercut dickhead

Nice try. Goodes V hawthorn? Surely you read don't you? Oh that's right your a troll I forgot for a minute.

you blithering cock
NewsletterRSSShare.288171-tlsnewslandscape


The Swans approached the AFL just two weeks ago after Goodes was abused at the same venue in his side's 37-point loss to Hawthorn in round seven

You really can't read can you. I've never seen so much fail in one thread. It's like I just gave you a hard core slap... Wammm and then you have come back for seconds...
Maybe three times a charm. Maybe you will read it this time. Notice the words "There was no suggestion of racial vilification".



http://www.AFL.com.au/news/2013-05-14/g ... ppropriate

Found this. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/VFL/AFL_ ... ackgrounds

Raiderdave wrote:

Judge J wrote:

Raider Dave I am referring to the 250 instances you claimed, not the 4 that have been verified.

And you will moderate your language when addressing me.

hmmm
maybe you can translate this into English then ?

Judge J wrote:. At present, the number proven lies at 4 and only 4.

FMD
how dumb

How is my statement "dumb"? It was you who claimed that there were 250 instances of racism in the AFL. You have 246 to go.