Talking Footy

Swans4ever wrote:

Really Raiderdave you really show disturbing tendency's arn't they just kids having fun at sport? I bet you tasted alot of toilet water at school, clearly had a very negative impact on your mental stability. If RL had a presence in Vic schools I certainly wouldn't knock any kid because he played it, maybe thats better than sitting on a computer playing computer games. Any Raiderdave good luck (ps I'd love to see you tell Cameron Mooney ur thoughts or Barry Hall)

I dunno about fun
I saw this weedy little fella .... about 40kgs ringing wet , a weekend fumbler
trot out in the school RL team yr 8/9

whacked him on the wing .. of course
the other side had a centre ... this kid was 88kgs .. 6'2 & apparently can run 100m in 12 secs ( a Raiders Harold Matts Cup player )

the centre hits a hole at top speed late in the game with it in the balance & goes straight through , fullback comes from a deep sweeper possie & heards the centre toward the touchline & ur little fumbler but isn't going to make it across & its all up to the winger

the look on this kids face was pricless
he just stepped outta the way

game ova


now lets be clear .... if he'd attempted to stop the ball runner he'd of ended up in traction in hospital
so be was smart

not very brave
but smart at least eh

these are our games in a nutshell
end of

So a sport that is more damaging is by definition better ??

And to pick on and make fun of kids here because they may not be the toughest or strongest ... Or even good at sport ... Good on them for giving sport a go. And if AFL suits them then all power to them. And if nrl suits the stronger bulkier or even the larger child ... All power to them also ... For getting out there and giving sport a go and finding something they're good at.

I play baseball and surf ... Neither contact sports but both big sports in various parts of the world .

Phelpsy wrote:

So a sport that is more damaging is by definition better ??

RL is better for a whole host of reasons ...&
you only get damaged if you aren't built to play RL

well .. badly damaged
its quite daunting for our little fumblers to take the field in an RL game
they come off with a new found respect for it

We'll for someone that's never played the game you have a significant interest in young boys playing AF, has mummy let you online to play for an hour? You couldn't compete at an under 10's level and as for RL I think Issy proved most RL players couldn't either!

Swans4ever wrote:

We'll for someone that's never played the game you have a significant interest in young boys playing AF, has mummy let you online to play for an hour? You couldn't compete at an under 10's level and as for RL I think Issy proved most RL players couldn't either!

again
your .. intellect is letting you down
as I've explained before , I don't have any interest in fumbling & bumbling

its when these kids try their hand at a real sport that I see them , & their lack of ability n courage
they have hands like feet
no vision
& have very slow response times

I know its hard for you to fathom swines4ever
but fathom it you must

Yeah we all know mummy doesn't let you play only watch - does she make you hold her hand the whole time Raiderdave. Me I have such hangups have played RL, RU, soccer and AF. Perhaps its time for potty Raiderdave mummy won't stay on the computer all morning!

Raiderdave wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

So a sport that is more damaging is by definition better ??

RL is better for a whole host of reasons ...&
you only get damaged if you aren't built to play RL

well .. badly damaged
its quite daunting for our little fumblers to take the field in an RL game
they come off with a new found respect for it

Well if rugby leauge doesn't suit their body type and they get badly hurt then why would they play ... They would find the sport they're most suited to . Just like it is better to be tall for basketball I guess. I'm not sure what the issue is but to use the terms you have against these kids ... Bullying type terms like nerd, weedy ... Why would you look at a child that way. We're you bullied Dave as a kid. If so i am sorry you had to experience that.

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

well you didn't live up this way did you shit for brains
up this way
if you wore a singlet & your little sisters shorts when playing a sport at school
you were a fumbler ... & a nerd

your PE teacher made sure fumblers were at least useful , by being a towel or water boy for the real sport & its athletes .. Rugby League

bigger
faster
stronger

Your stories are never true, so once again I'm calling BS on this one.

Bigger faster stonger hey?
Bigger... yeah, rl players are pretty fat.
Faster... maybe at eating pies?
stronger... at wrestling for more food?

rl players... not real athletes, just dumb neanderthals.

skinny weedy bobby bouche's
un co ordinated bumbling nerds in singlets
only good enough to carry the water to our lads & hand towels to them for the games our schools up here care about
the Clyde & Router Shields

hard to deal with for delusional twats from across the murray
but deal with it

they must

The kids that play rl are either a) forced to by their parents or b) to shit to play any other sport.

It's not like rl is a hard sport to play.

The ones with real talent leave to play a harder game ala Kieran Jack