Page 4 of 6

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 9:07 am
by Raiderdave
Drac wrote:
lol, 1 crowd in the rain against the Suns and Dave declared victory. Number 1 drawing team across all codes in Sydney for 18 years in a row. 2013 will be no different. How'd the Raiders do tonight against GWS Dave?
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...

& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5

:-k

thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ? :cool:

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:03 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Drac wrote:
lol, 1 crowd in the rain against the Suns and Dave declared victory. Number 1 drawing team across all codes in Sydney for 18 years in a row. 2013 will be no different. How'd the Raiders do tonight against GWS Dave?
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...

& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5

:-k

thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ? :cool:
Hmm funny how even the Canberra media acknowledge the giants had a bigger crowd!

Poor Dave :cry:

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:24 pm
by Drac
Raiderdave wrote:
Drac wrote:
lol, 1 crowd in the rain against the Suns and Dave declared victory. Number 1 drawing team across all codes in Sydney for 18 years in a row. 2013 will be no different. How'd the Raiders do tonight against GWS Dave?
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...

& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5

:-k

thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ? :cool:
The Swans have played one home game. 10 to come. Are you willing to bet that after the remaining 10 home Swans games that they won't feature in the top 5 crowds in Sydney? Man up and let's bet Dave or stop dribbling.

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:41 pm
by Xman
Drac wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Drac wrote:
lol, 1 crowd in the rain against the Suns and Dave declared victory. Number 1 drawing team across all codes in Sydney for 18 years in a row. 2013 will be no different. How'd the Raiders do tonight against GWS Dave?
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...

& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5

:-k

thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ? :cool:
The Swans have played one home game. 10 to come. Are you willing to bet that after the remaining 10 home Swans games that they won't feature in the top 5 crowds in Sydney? Man up and let's bet Dave or stop dribbling.
Raiderdave:
"Oh but 5 years ago they were dominating Sydney.......blah blah blah" :lol:

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:28 pm
by Raiderdave
Drac wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Drac wrote:
lol, 1 crowd in the rain against the Suns and Dave declared victory. Number 1 drawing team across all codes in Sydney for 18 years in a row. 2013 will be no different. How'd the Raiders do tonight against GWS Dave?
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...

& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5

:-k

thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ? :cool:
The Swans have played one home game. 10 to come. Are you willing to bet that after the remaining 10 home Swans games that they won't feature in the top 5 crowds in Sydney? Man up and let's bet Dave or stop dribbling.
well lets just make it the biggest H&A crowd for 2013 ... the NRL or the Swines :cool:
put your money where your fat mouth is

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:31 pm
by Raiderdave
actually

fuck that


Vicky kicky fans welch on bets like cockless sheilas...

I'm yet to see one honour a lost bet
& they lose

a lot


they have no honour
they cannot be trusted .... being slime bags is one of their better qualities :cool:

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:32 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Drac wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...

& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5

:-k

thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ? :cool:
The Swans have played one home game. 10 to come. Are you willing to bet that after the remaining 10 home Swans games that they won't feature in the top 5 crowds in Sydney? Man up and let's bet Dave or stop dribbling.
well lets just make it the biggest H&A crowd for 2013 ... the NRL or the Swines :cool:
put your money where your fat mouth is
So the Swans v all Sydney's NRL teams, wow, how low an opinion you must have of your own code in their own heartland :lol:

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:33 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
actually

fuck that


Vicky kicky fans welch on bets like cockless sheilas...

I'm yet to see one honour a lost bet
& they lose

a lot


they have no honour
they cannot be trusted .... being slime bags is one of their better qualities :cool:
hahaha that confidence in you own code lasted a whole 1 minute Dave :lol:

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:44 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Drac wrote:
The Swans have played one home game. 10 to come. Are you willing to bet that after the remaining 10 home Swans games that they won't feature in the top 5 crowds in Sydney? Man up and let's bet Dave or stop dribbling.
well lets just make it the biggest H&A crowd for 2013 ... the NRL or the Swines :cool:
put your money where your fat mouth is
So the Swans v all Sydney's NRL teams:

seriously .. wot ? 8-[

post sense you baboon .... #-o

if it were the swines V all sydney nrl clubs
it would be 24K


to 160K

yeah
thats what i meant :roll:

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:46 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
actually

fuck that


Vicky kicky fans welch on bets like cockless sheilas...

I'm yet to see one honour a lost bet
& they lose

a lot


they have no honour
they cannot be trusted .... being slime bags is one of their better qualities :cool:
hahaha that confidence in you own code lasted a whole 1 minute Dave :lol:
no

it was the confidence in vicky kicky supporters honouring a bet ...... & theres no confidence at all in that [-X [-X [-( [-( [-(
lower then slime that lot :cool:

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 11:00 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
well lets just make it the biggest H&A crowd for 2013 ... the NRL or the Swines :cool:
put your money where your fat mouth is
So the Swans v all Sydney's NRL teams:

seriously .. wot ? 8-[

post sense you baboon .... #-o

if it were the swines V all sydney nrl clubs
it would be 24K


to 160K

yeah
thats what i meant :roll:
Oh you meant total audience, wow how brave of you :lol:

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 11:01 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
actually

fuck that


Vicky kicky fans welch on bets like cockless sheilas...

I'm yet to see one honour a lost bet
& they lose

a lot


they have no honour
they cannot be trusted .... being slime bags is one of their better qualities :cool:
hahaha that confidence in you own code lasted a whole 1 minute Dave :lol:
no

it was the confidence in vicky kicky supporters honouring a bet ...... & theres no confidence at all in that [-X [-X [-( [-( [-(
lower then slime that lot :cool:
What did you have to lose if you had any confidence at all? :lol:

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:40 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
hahaha that confidence in you own code lasted a whole 1 minute Dave :lol:
no

it was the confidence in vicky kicky supporters honouring a bet ...... & theres no confidence at all in that [-X [-X [-( [-( [-(
lower then slime that lot :cool:
What did you have to lose if you had any confidence at all? :lol:
wel I suppose I could do what bumbleball supporters in here do

make a bet
lose it

& then welch :-k

but of course I have far too much honour & integrity to do that
better I just poke fun at your declining sport when the NRL again claims the largest H&A crowd in Sydney in 2013 :wink:

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:32 am
by Fred
Just on the side , was reading a roar article and a rugby leauge guy was saying how this year the nrl is a four horse race ... I think Melbourne, manly, rabbits, and another team were mentioned ... Maybe roosters ? I don't agree but Found it interesting in light of this thread lol

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:20 pm
by Stewie
Phelpsy wrote:
Just on the side , was reading a roar article and a rugby leauge guy was saying how this year the nrl is a four horse race ... I think Melbourne, manly, rabbits, and another team were mentioned ... Maybe roosters ? I don't agree but Found it interesting in light of this thread lol
More of a 1 horse race lol. Storm.