Page 4 of 6
Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 9:07 am
by Raiderdave
Drac wrote:lol, 1 crowd in the rain against the Suns and Dave declared victory. Number 1 drawing team across all codes in Sydney for 18 years in a row. 2013 will be no different. How'd the Raiders do tonight against GWS Dave?
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...
& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5
thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ?

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:03 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:lol, 1 crowd in the rain against the Suns and Dave declared victory. Number 1 drawing team across all codes in Sydney for 18 years in a row. 2013 will be no different. How'd the Raiders do tonight against GWS Dave?
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...
& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5
thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ?

Hmm funny how even the Canberra media acknowledge the giants had a bigger crowd!
Poor Dave

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:24 pm
by Drac
Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:lol, 1 crowd in the rain against the Suns and Dave declared victory. Number 1 drawing team across all codes in Sydney for 18 years in a row. 2013 will be no different. How'd the Raiders do tonight against GWS Dave?
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...
& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5
thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ?

The Swans have played one home game. 10 to come. Are you willing to bet that after the remaining 10 home Swans games that they won't feature in the top 5 crowds in Sydney? Man up and let's bet Dave or stop dribbling.
Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:41 pm
by Xman
Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:lol, 1 crowd in the rain against the Suns and Dave declared victory. Number 1 drawing team across all codes in Sydney for 18 years in a row. 2013 will be no different. How'd the Raiders do tonight against GWS Dave?
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...
& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5
thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ?

The Swans have played one home game. 10 to come. Are you willing to bet that after the remaining 10 home Swans games that they won't feature in the top 5 crowds in Sydney? Man up and let's bet Dave or stop dribbling.
Raiderdave:
"Oh but 5 years ago they were dominating Sydney.......blah blah blah"

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:28 pm
by Raiderdave
Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:lol, 1 crowd in the rain against the Suns and Dave declared victory. Number 1 drawing team across all codes in Sydney for 18 years in a row. 2013 will be no different. How'd the Raiders do tonight against GWS Dave?
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...
& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5
thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ?

The Swans have played one home game. 10 to come. Are you willing to bet that after the remaining 10 home Swans games that they won't feature in the top 5 crowds in Sydney? Man up and let's bet Dave or stop dribbling.
well lets just make it the biggest H&A crowd for 2013 ... the NRL or the Swines
put your money where your fat mouth is
Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:31 pm
by Raiderdave
actually
fuck that
Vicky kicky fans welch on bets like cockless sheilas...
I'm yet to see one honour a lost bet
& they lose
a lot
they have no honour
they cannot be trusted .... being slime bags is one of their better qualities

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:32 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
as we all know on actual attendances
the Raiders won the battle by about 2K ...
& as I've asked several singlet wearing bafoons now ...... no Swines crowds in the top 5
thats unheard of
whats doing with ol bumbleball in Sydney then ?

The Swans have played one home game. 10 to come. Are you willing to bet that after the remaining 10 home Swans games that they won't feature in the top 5 crowds in Sydney? Man up and let's bet Dave or stop dribbling.
well lets just make it the biggest H&A crowd for 2013 ... the NRL or the Swines
put your money where your fat mouth is
So the Swans v all Sydney's NRL teams, wow, how low an opinion you must have of your own code in their own heartland

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:33 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:actually
fuck that
Vicky kicky fans welch on bets like cockless sheilas...
I'm yet to see one honour a lost bet
& they lose
a lot
they have no honour
they cannot be trusted .... being slime bags is one of their better qualities

hahaha that confidence in you own code lasted a whole 1 minute Dave

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:44 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Drac wrote:
The Swans have played one home game. 10 to come. Are you willing to bet that after the remaining 10 home Swans games that they won't feature in the top 5 crowds in Sydney? Man up and let's bet Dave or stop dribbling.
well lets just make it the biggest H&A crowd for 2013 ... the NRL or the Swines
put your money where your fat mouth is
So the Swans v all Sydney's NRL teams:
seriously .. wot ?
post sense you baboon ....
if it were the swines V all sydney nrl clubs
it would be 24K
to 160K
yeah
thats what i meant

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:46 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:actually
fuck that
Vicky kicky fans welch on bets like cockless sheilas...
I'm yet to see one honour a lost bet
& they lose
a lot
they have no honour
they cannot be trusted .... being slime bags is one of their better qualities

hahaha that confidence in you own code lasted a whole 1 minute Dave

no
it was the confidence in vicky kicky supporters honouring a bet ...... & theres no confidence at all in that
lower then slime that lot

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 11:00 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
well lets just make it the biggest H&A crowd for 2013 ... the NRL or the Swines
put your money where your fat mouth is
So the Swans v all Sydney's NRL teams:
seriously .. wot ?
post sense you baboon ....
if it were the swines V all sydney nrl clubs
it would be 24K
to 160K
yeah
thats what i meant

Oh you meant total audience, wow how brave of you

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 11:01 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:actually
fuck that
Vicky kicky fans welch on bets like cockless sheilas...
I'm yet to see one honour a lost bet
& they lose
a lot
they have no honour
they cannot be trusted .... being slime bags is one of their better qualities

hahaha that confidence in you own code lasted a whole 1 minute Dave

no
it was the confidence in vicky kicky supporters honouring a bet ...... & theres no confidence at all in that
lower then slime that lot

What did you have to lose if you had any confidence at all?

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:40 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:hahaha that confidence in you own code lasted a whole 1 minute Dave

no
it was the confidence in vicky kicky supporters honouring a bet ...... & theres no confidence at all in that
lower then slime that lot

What did you have to lose if you had any confidence at all?

wel I suppose I could do what bumbleball supporters in here do
make a bet
lose it
& then welch
but of course I have far too much honour & integrity to do that
better I just poke fun at your declining sport when the NRL again claims the largest H&A crowd in Sydney in 2013

Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:32 am
by Fred
Just on the side , was reading a roar article and a rugby leauge guy was saying how this year the nrl is a four horse race ... I think Melbourne, manly, rabbits, and another team were mentioned ... Maybe roosters ? I don't agree but Found it interesting in light of this thread lol
Re: NRL blockbusters to fall well short in spectator stakes
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:20 pm
by Stewie
Phelpsy wrote:Just on the side , was reading a roar article and a rugby leauge guy was saying how this year the nrl is a four horse race ... I think Melbourne, manly, rabbits, and another team were mentioned ... Maybe roosters ? I don't agree but Found it interesting in light of this thread lol
More of a 1 horse race lol. Storm.