Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

http://www.austadiums.com/stadiums/stad ... php?id=279

Here's another site.

46 voters rated facilities, viewing, access, and overall as all above 82%!

Seems like people think AAMI park is a phenomenal stadium! In fact it rated similar to Etihad on the same site.

Where are your excuses now?

46 out of over 10K. Big deal. Probably paid off, or there was no wind or rain on the day, and in Melbourne that's not very often noawadays!

Xman wrote:

The storm havent grown in 15 years

haven't grown ?
hmmm
yes
2006 37K average crowds with 1 VFL side in Sydney
2013 30K average crowds combined for .........2 VFL sides in Sydney

thats growth .. VFL style

Striker wrote:

Xman wrote:

http://www.austadiums.com/stadiums/stad ... php?id=279

Here's another site.

46 voters rated facilities, viewing, access, and overall as all above 82%!

Seems like people think AAMI park is a phenomenal stadium! In fact it rated similar to Etihad on the same site.

Where are your excuses now?

46 out of over 10K. Big deal. Probably paid off, or there was no wind or rain on the day, and in Melbourne that's not very often noawadays!

There werent 10k who voted idiot!

Probably paid off....... this is a common theme of yours. Just like Raiderdave and his fudging fudging claims.

Both you two refuse to acknowledge data that doesnt suite your argument yet are perfectly happy to accept data that does!

What a pack of losers!!!

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

The storm havent grown in 15 years

haven't grown ?
hmmm
yes
2006 37K average crowds with 1 VFL side in Sydney
2013 30K average crowds combined for .........2 VFL sides in Sydney

thats growth .. VFL style

Have you got a link for those 2013 figures. Id love to see them....

Xman wrote:

Have you got a link for those 2013 figures. Id love to see them

the Swines Averaged 24K
the Midgets about 6

geez
try & keep up Marcus
try

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Have you got a link for those 2013 figures. Id love to see them

the Swines Averaged 24K
the Midgets about 6

geez
try & keep up Marcus
try

No, I know you think youre an official source, but an actual genuine link.....

Xman wrote:

No, I know you think youre an official source, but an actual genuine link.....

as has been proven
the VFL fudged the Midgets home attendances all season
so any official sources are corrupted by the VFL
so can't be used
its shameful & disgraceful
but true

when will th lies stop with this mob

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

No, I know you think youre an official source, but an actual genuine link.....

as has been proven
the VFL fudged the Midgets home attendances all season
so any official sources are corrupted by the VFL
so can't be used
its shameful & disgraceful
but true

when will th lies stop with this mob

Yet your figures are legitimate......

Plus the stadiums announce the attendance, not the AFL Try again

Xman wrote:

the stadiums announce the attendance, not the AFL

no
the VFL does


..... end of

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

the stadiums announce the attendance, not the AFL

no
the VFL does


..... end of

prove it,

and try real proof, not Dave proof

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

the stadiums announce the attendance, not the AFL

no
the VFL does


..... end of

prove it,

and try real proof, not Dave proof

if stadiums announce crowds , not the comps headbody , then how did the NRL/clubs fudged crowds in at the past as you lot claim whilst wetting your pants ?

you claim the NRL/clubs fudged these crowds
so they or their clubs had to of announced them right ....
yep
just like the VFL /clubs do now too

debate ends .... here

The stadiums made the mistake. They even said that at the time

Xman wrote:

The stadiums made the mistake. They even said that at the time

The Melbourne Storm CEO disagrees.

What's the bet the Storm with their News Limited money paid the stadium owners to lie?

Xman wrote:

Striker wrote:

Xman wrote:

http://www.austadiums.com/stadiums/stad ... php?id=279

Here's another site.

46 voters rated facilities, viewing, access, and overall as all above 82%!

Seems like people think AAMI park is a phenomenal stadium! In fact it rated similar to Etihad on the same site.

Where are your excuses now?

46 out of over 10K. Big deal. Probably paid off, or there was no wind or rain on the day, and in Melbourne that's not very often noawadays!

There werent 10k who voted idiot!

Probably paid off....... this is a common theme of yours. Just like Raiderdave and his fudging fudging claims.

Both you two refuse to acknowledge data that doesnt suite your argument yet are perfectly happy to accept data that does!

What a pack of losers!!!

What a cry baby when faced with the folly of your argument! Since when does 0.0046 percent of a fan base (and be grateful I didn't include the Victory or the Rebels!!) represent a feasible survey sample?

Striker wrote:

Xman wrote:

There werent 10k who voted idiot!

Probably paid off....... this is a common theme of yours. Just like Raiderdave and his fudging fudging claims.

Both you two refuse to acknowledge data that doesnt suite your argument yet are perfectly happy to accept data that does!

What a pack of losers!!!

What a cry baby when faced with the folly of your argument! Since when does 0.0046 percent of a fan base (and be grateful I didn't include the Victory or the Rebels!!) represent a feasible survey sample?

how do you think the TV ratings system works? About 3000 homes from 23M people

If 80-90% of a sample size of 50 love the product its decent!

Thats unless the websites are fake and the voters bribed