the VFL , officially a disgrace

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by Raiderdave »

piesman2011 wrote:
Team performance since they have been penalised:

NRL (where cheaters prosper)
Storm: 1 premiership 2012 (2 years after breach penalties) and 1 minor premiership 2011 (year after)
Bulldogs: 1 premiership (2 years after penalties)
Warriors: Runners up 2011 (5 years after penalties)

AFL:
Carlton: best 5th spot about 9 years after sanctions. 2 Woodenspoons (after 0 in 140 years)

Now tell me which comp is better at punishing cheating teams.
all i see above is

NRL teams .... gutz & determination to overcome adversity & setbacks & accept no excuse for mediocrity
VFL teams .... spineless gimps who give up & blame everyone else for their problems



end of :cool:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
piesman2011
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2306
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
Team: Collingwood
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by piesman2011 »

Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Team performance since they have been penalised:

NRL (where cheaters prosper)
Storm: 1 premiership 2012 (2 years after breach penalties) and 1 minor premiership 2011 (year after)
Bulldogs: 1 premiership (2 years after penalties)
Warriors: Runners up 2011 (5 years after penalties)

AFL:
Carlton: best 5th spot about 9 years after sanctions. 2 Woodenspoons (after 0 in 140 years)

Now tell me which comp is better at punishing cheating teams.
all i see above is

NRL teams .... gutz & determination to overcome adversity & setbacks & accept no excuse for mediocrity
VFL teams .... spineless gimps who give up & blame everyone else for their problems



end of :cool:
No you dont you see what I am talking about. :wink:
Cheating teams that within a couple years win the premiership. Shouldnt be possible with proper sanctions.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by Raiderdave »

piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Team performance since they have been penalised:

NRL (where cheaters prosper)
Storm: 1 premiership 2012 (2 years after breach penalties) and 1 minor premiership 2011 (year after)
Bulldogs: 1 premiership (2 years after penalties)
Warriors: Runners up 2011 (5 years after penalties)

AFL:
Carlton: best 5th spot about 9 years after sanctions. 2 Woodenspoons (after 0 in 140 years)

Now tell me which comp is better at punishing cheating teams.
all i see above is

NRL teams .... gutz & determination to overcome adversity & setbacks & accept no excuse for mediocrity
VFL teams .... spineless gimps who give up & blame everyone else for their problems



end of :cool:
No you dont you see what I am talking about. :wink:
Cheating teams that within a couple years win the premiership. Shouldnt be possible with proper sanctions.
No you dont you see what I am talking about.

the NRL absolutely hammered these sides ...it imposed massive penalties
there is nothing more they could have done short of shutting these sides down

it is a credit to these sides that they were able to absorb these punishments & bound back
their internal club cultures were ... unshakeable
their development & recruiting systems .... 2nd to none
these punishments just gave these NRL sides more determination to succeed

while VFL teams just turn their tales up ... no passion or pride in their club or each other as a team
no galvanising to prove a point .... just moaning about how they now can't win
VFL punishments are just an excuse to .. well .... tank

NRL sides .... strong mentally
VFL sides ... weak as piss
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
piesman2011
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2306
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
Team: Collingwood
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by piesman2011 »

Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
all i see above is

NRL teams .... gutz & determination to overcome adversity & setbacks & accept no excuse for mediocrity
VFL teams .... spineless gimps who give up & blame everyone else for their problems



end of :cool:
No you dont you see what I am talking about. :wink:
Cheating teams that within a couple years win the premiership. Shouldnt be possible with proper sanctions.
No you dont you see what I am talking about.

the NRL absolutely hammered these sides ...it imposed massive penalties
there is nothing more they could have done short of shutting these sides down

it is a credit to these sides that they were able to absorb these punishments & bound back
their internal club cultures were ... unshakeable
their development & recruiting systems .... 2nd to none
these punishments just gave these NRL sides more determination to succeed

while VFL teams just turn their tales up ... no passion or pride in their club or each other as a team
no galvanising to prove a point .... just moaning about how they now can't win
VFL punishments are just an excuse to .. well .... tank

NRL sides .... strong mentally
VFL sides ... weak as piss
Sides that are absolutely hammered do not come back in 2 years and win premierships. If they were they would have lost the talent that they picked up through cheating the cap + a lot more talent so that there was no way that they couldnt have been competative. If they were punished as you have suggested they should have been right down the bottom of the ladder for quite a few years but this was not the case.
I know you agree with me deep down. You are just being the NRL yes man.
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by Xman »

Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Striker wrote:
The Crows should have been kicked out of the draft for longer than that. One player loss? Peanuts. $300,000 fine? Should have been $1 million. The club directors should have been suspended for life.

THAT is a big punishment, Stew!
:roll:

Which would have eclipsed every NRL punishment except the storm, despite being 20% of the warriors breach :roll:
the Warriors LOST 4 comp points for their following season D head for their indescretion
a massive penalty

they started on MINUS 4 points at the start of the year
FMD

know something .. before posting :roll:
The Warriors were fined 430k for 1 Million dollars worth of rorting. They then lost, what, 2 wins from sanctions. This only affected them for that season.

The Crows were fined 300k for 200k worth of rorts =D> . They have also lost their first 4 draft picks over 2 years which will affect them for many years to come, just like Carlton. In addition the CEO and player were fined and banned.

Seriously, how can you possibly think the Warriors were dealt more harshly??? :roll:
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by Xman »

piesman2011 wrote:
Team performance since they have been penalised:

NRL (where cheaters prosper)
Storm: 1 premiership 2012 (2 years after breach penalties) and 1 minor premiership 2011 (year after)
Bulldogs: 1 premiership (2 years after penalties)
Warriors: Runners up 2011 (5 years after penalties)

AFL:
Carlton: best 5th spot about 9 years after sanctions. 2 Woodenspoons (after 0 in 140 years)

Now tell me which comp is better at punishing cheating teams.
Absolutely correct!

The harsher penalty is the one with lasting ramifications. A slap on the wrist is a small fine and maybe a game or two lost. How does that punish the team for future seasons?

The NRL are so soft on salary cap cheating its not even worth the punishment. ](*,)
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by Raiderdave »

piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
No you dont you see what I am talking about. :wink:
Cheating teams that within a couple years win the premiership. Shouldnt be possible with proper sanctions.
No you dont you see what I am talking about.

the NRL absolutely hammered these sides ...it imposed massive penalties
there is nothing more they could have done short of shutting these sides down

it is a credit to these sides that they were able to absorb these punishments & bound back
their internal club cultures were ... unshakeable
their development & recruiting systems .... 2nd to none
these punishments just gave these NRL sides more determination to succeed

while VFL teams just turn their tales up ... no passion or pride in their club or each other as a team
no galvanising to prove a point .... just moaning about how they now can't win
VFL punishments are just an excuse to .. well .... tank

NRL sides .... strong mentally
VFL sides ... weak as piss
Sides that are absolutely hammered do not come back in 2 years and win premierships..

Good ones do
average ones don't .....& as we know .. the VFL is wall to wall average

the 3 NRL sides mentioned are just champion outfits that overcame being virtually destroyed & simply wouldn't accept this as being an excuse for being at the bottom of the ladder .... unlike these piss weak tanking VFL sides did

now the VFL doesn't even punish them
wow
what a low comp. [-( [-( [-(
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Team performance since they have been penalised:

NRL (where cheaters prosper)
Storm: 1 premiership 2012 (2 years after breach penalties) and 1 minor premiership 2011 (year after)
Bulldogs: 1 premiership (2 years after penalties)
Warriors: Runners up 2011 (5 years after penalties)

AFL:
Carlton: best 5th spot about 9 years after sanctions. 2 Woodenspoons (after 0 in 140 years)

Now tell me which comp is better at punishing cheating teams.
Absolutely correct!

The harsher penalty is the one with lasting ramifications. A slap on the wrist is a small fine and maybe a game or two lost. How does that punish the team for future seasons?

The NRL are so soft on salary cap cheating its not even worth the punishment. ](*,)
a game or two 8-[
the Bulldogs & Storm were removed for entire seasons , the Storm stripped of premierships .... :lol: :lol: :lol:
as well as fined millions


the buzzards have no penalty for 2013.... & were flogged with a wet lettuce leaf for 2014
VFL
an utter disgrace [-( [-( [-( [-(
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by Xman »

Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Team performance since they have been penalised:

NRL (where cheaters prosper)
Storm: 1 premiership 2012 (2 years after breach penalties) and 1 minor premiership 2011 (year after)
Bulldogs: 1 premiership (2 years after penalties)
Warriors: Runners up 2011 (5 years after penalties)

AFL:
Carlton: best 5th spot about 9 years after sanctions. 2 Woodenspoons (after 0 in 140 years)

Now tell me which comp is better at punishing cheating teams.
Absolutely correct!

The harsher penalty is the one with lasting ramifications. A slap on the wrist is a small fine and maybe a game or two lost. How does that punish the team for future seasons?

The NRL are so soft on salary cap cheating its not even worth the punishment. ](*,)
a game or two 8-[
the Bulldogs & Storm were removed for entire seasons , the Storm stripped of premierships .... :lol: :lol: :lol:
as well as fined millions


the buzzards have no penalty for 2013.... & were flogged with a wet lettuce leaf for 2014
VFL
an utter disgrace [-( [-( [-( [-(
so losing draft picks is no penalty?

Nice how you claim the storm and bulldogs yet ignore all the other NRL indescretions :roll: . Both these teams cheated on an unprecedented level and deserved far harsher penalties. [-X

NRL = impotent
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by Stewie »

Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
:roll:

Which would have eclipsed every NRL punishment except the storm, despite being 20% of the warriors breach :roll:
the Warriors LOST 4 comp points for their following season D head for their indescretion
a massive penalty

they started on MINUS 4 points at the start of the year
FMD

know something .. before posting :roll:
The Warriors were fined 430k for 1 Million dollars worth of rorting. They then lost, what, 2 wins from sanctions. This only affected them for that season.

The Crows were fined 300k for 200k worth of rorts =D> . They have also lost their first 4 draft picks over 2 years which will affect them for many years to come, just like Carlton. In addition the CEO and player were fined and banned.

Seriously, how can you possibly think the Warriors were dealt more harshly??? :roll:
Wait the Warriors were fined less than the the amount of money they cheated with? And nRL fans wonder why we laugh at their pathetic league :lol:

nRL = joke :wink:
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
piesman2011
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2306
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
Team: Collingwood
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by piesman2011 »

Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
No you dont you see what I am talking about.

the NRL absolutely hammered these sides ...it imposed massive penalties
there is nothing more they could have done short of shutting these sides down

it is a credit to these sides that they were able to absorb these punishments & bound back
their internal club cultures were ... unshakeable
their development & recruiting systems .... 2nd to none
these punishments just gave these NRL sides more determination to succeed

while VFL teams just turn their tales up ... no passion or pride in their club or each other as a team
no galvanising to prove a point .... just moaning about how they now can't win
VFL punishments are just an excuse to .. well .... tank

NRL sides .... strong mentally
VFL sides ... weak as piss
Sides that are absolutely hammered do not come back in 2 years and win premierships..

Good ones do
average ones don't .....& as we know .. the VFL is wall to wall average

the 3 NRL sides mentioned are just champion outfits that overcame being virtually destroyed & simply wouldn't accept this as being an excuse for being at the bottom of the ladder .... unlike these piss weak tanking VFL sides did

now the VFL doesn't even punish them
wow
what a low comp. [-( [-( [-(
So what you are saying is that in the NRL all the good sides cheat and win while the poor sides dont cheat and comtinue to lose? How crap is the rest of the competition if the cheating sided can be punished so harshly and win premierships 2 years later? Must be a lobsided competition.
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by Xman »

piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Sides that are absolutely hammered do not come back in 2 years and win premierships..

Good ones do
average ones don't .....& as we know .. the VFL is wall to wall average

the 3 NRL sides mentioned are just champion outfits that overcame being virtually destroyed & simply wouldn't accept this as being an excuse for being at the bottom of the ladder .... unlike these piss weak tanking VFL sides did

now the VFL doesn't even punish them
wow
what a low comp. [-( [-( [-(
So what you are saying is that in the NRL all the good sides cheat and win while the poor sides dont cheat and comtinue to lose? How crap is the rest of the competition if the cheating sided can be punished so harshly and win premierships 2 years later? Must be a lobsided competition.
Well given the Storm have made the GF 5 of the last 8 years thats pretty clear.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
eelofwest
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2717
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:15 pm
Team: Eels
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by eelofwest »

Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
Team performance since they have been penalised:

NRL (where cheaters prosper)
Storm: 1 premiership 2012 (2 years after breach penalties) and 1 minor premiership 2011 (year after)
Bulldogs: 1 premiership (2 years after penalties)
Warriors: Runners up 2011 (5 years after penalties)

AFL:
Carlton: best 5th spot about 9 years after sanctions. 2 Woodenspoons (after 0 in 140 years)

Now tell me which comp is better at punishing cheating teams.
Absolutely correct!

The harsher penalty is the one with lasting ramifications. A slap on the wrist is a small fine and maybe a game or two lost. How does that punish the team for future seasons?

The NRL are so soft on salary cap cheating its not even worth the punishment. ](*,)
a game or two 8-[
the Bulldogs & Storm were removed for entire seasons , the Storm stripped of premierships .... :lol: :lol: :lol:
as well as fined millions


the buzzards have no penalty for 2013.... & were flogged with a wet lettuce leaf for 2014
VFL
an utter disgrace [-( [-( [-( [-(

Adelaide Crows aren't the only club to find themselves in trouble with the AFL's salary cap investigators over time. The list may be longer than you think.

The Crows next week expect to be charged over the Kurt Tippett scandal.

If this occurs, they will become the latest club to be punished for misconduct relating to player payments.

Carlton is well known to have received the heaviest penalty in 2002, which the club says hurt it for a decade.

But many others have felt the wrath of the AFL over time, as this list suggests.

1987, Sydney were fined the maximum of $60,000 and forfeited their first round pick in the National Draft after a VFL investigation found that they had exceeded the salary cap by $1.15 million during the season.

1992, Sydney were fined $50,000 after it was found that they had failed to disclose payments made to former player Greg Williams during the 1990 season; Williams was suspended for six matches and fined the maximum of $25,000 for accepting the payments.

1994, Carlton were fined $50,000 after it was found that they had exceeded the salary cap by $85,000 during the 1993 season.

1995, Sydney were fined $20,000 after key documents relating to player financial details and star full-forward Tony Lockett's contract details were lost in the post by club officials, forcing the club, who had won the last three wooden spoons, to scratch from the 1995 pre-season draft and play the season two players short. The club officials responsible were fired by the Swans one week later.

1996, Essendon were fined a record $638,250 ($250,000 in back tax and penalties, $112,000 for draft tampering and $276,250 for breaching the salary cap regulations), forfeited their first, second and third round picks in the National Draft and were excluded from the 1997 rookie and pre-season drafts after a joint Australian Tax Office and AFL investigation found that they had committed serious and systematic breaches of the salary cap regulations totalling $514,500 between 1991 and 1996.

1997 Geelong were fined $77,000 in 1998 and excluded from the 1999 pre-season draft after it was found that they had exceeded the salary cap by $154,000 during the 1997 season.

1998, the West Coast Eagles were fined $100,000 and forfeited their third round pick in the National Draft after it was found that they had exceeded the salary cap by a total of $165,000 during the 1997 and 1998 seasons.

1999, Melbourne were fined $600,000 and forfeited their first, second and third round picks in the National Draft for two years after it was found that they had committed serious and systematic breaches of the salary cap regulations totalling $810,000 between 1995 and 1998.


2001, Carlton were fined $125,150, forfeited their second and third round picks in the 2001 National Draft and were excluded from the 2002 pre-season draft after it was found that they had failed to disclose payments totaling $239,900 to captain Craig Bradley and incorrectly lodged an additional services agreement document during the 1998 and 1999 seasons.

2002, Carlton were fined a record $987,500 and forfeited their priority picks in the National Draft, their first and second round picks in the National Draft for two years and were excluded from the 2003 pre-season draft after an AFL investigation found that they had committed serious and systematic breaches of the salary cap regulations totaling $1.37 million between 1998 and 2001.

2003, Brisbane were fined $260,000 for late lodgement of documents relating to the contract and financial details of 26 players.

Read more: http://www.foxsports.com.au/AFL/AFL-pre ... z2EADTShez

Now add Adelaide 2011 breaches and

2012 Carlton with Judd and the Visy deal and it is clearly a competition without credibility... :wink:

Really puts the NRL salary cap breaches in perspective when lined up next to the AFL.......... :lol: :lol:

I found the comments to this article quite enlightening...... :lol:
Lulz McGullz of Chip City says… November 13, 2012 at 2:39 PM

Look at all the times Sydney stuffed up around the salary cap. Now the AFL just allows them to rort it legally by 10%. Must be nice to have the AFL look after you so much. All this waffle about the 'Bloods culture' more like 'bloody concessions'. :lol: :lol: :lol:
johnny of melbourne says… November 13, 2012 at 2:54 PM

Salary cap cheating has been rife in the AFL since 1987, looks like the sanctions handed out to date have not been a strong enough deterrent, need to throw the book and kitchen since at these clubs. Remember these are just the clubs that have been caught, these are plenty that have got away with cheating the salary cap. (btw i support Carlton) :lol: :lol: :lol:
Lettuce leaf....
Lulz McGullz of Chip City says… November 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM

If a premiership team can afford to spend $800k to $1m on a single player, while getting an extra kicker for a bogus cost of living factor (seriously - if you guys get extra should Adelaide and Port get less cap space than every other team?) then it is a pathetic advantage all for the AFL to push the game in a rugby league territory. The AFL is only interested in pushing the game into league heartlands at the moment - at the expense of the game in traditional AFL states. Luckily for the AFL - the NRL has no clue about how to push into Aussie rules areas. The complete lack of interest in the Storm in Melbourne proves this. =D> =D> =D>
Yes that is correct peoples, the AFL knowingly Rig the competition to Favor expansion teams/Area's.... [-X
Image
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by Xman »

Wow, 13 breaches at the most! :-k

The NRL have had near 80! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
piesman2011
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 2306
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:52 am
Team: Collingwood
Location:

Re: the VFL , officially a disgrace

Post by piesman2011 »

Eel,
In the last 25 since about the start of expansion:
The NRL with 6 current expansion teams Raiders, Storm, Broncos, Titans, Warriors and Cowboys have had:

13 of a possible 25 premierships won by expansion teams. Thats 52% of premierships won by 38% of teams. (Even more lobsided if you factor in the years in which some of these teams were not in the competition).

The AFL with 6 expansion teams Lions, Swans, Adelaide, Port Adelaide, Fremantle and West Coast (not counting the 2 new teams yet) have had:

11 of a possible 25 premierships won by expansion teams. Thats 44% of premierships won by 38% of teams.

So the competition that you believe is rigged in favour of the expansion teams is less rigged statistically then the competition that you favour. Go figure.

How do you guys fail so much at this?
Post Reply