Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

given theyre on a secondary digital channel and simulcast on Foxtel id say the Swans did very well.

the warriors are on pay you **** halfwit ..... 100% of Sydneysiders have access to the secondary digital channels
I'd doubt anymore then 33% of NZers have access to pay

I'd say the swines are considerably less popular in Sydney .. then the warriors are in NZ

and here endith another debate with a clear & decisive victory to the leaguies

if you count TV as a measure of popularity. Attendance and memberships are also indicators arent they Dave?

not the point here jizz for brains
Spewie said NZer's don't care much for RL .... he was rightly shown up to be a blithering git when I pointed out . compared to the Swines in Sydney ...
they are the biggest thing in town

end of

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

given theyre on a secondary digital channel and simulcast on Foxtel id say the Swans did very well.

the warriors are on pay you **** halfwit ..... 100% of Sydneysiders have access to the secondary digital channels
I'd doubt anymore then 33% of NZers have access to pay

I'd say the swines are considerably less popular in Sydney .. then the warriors are in NZ

and here endith another debate with a clear & decisive victory to the leaguies

if you count TV as a measure of popularity. Attendance and memberships are also indicators arent they Dave?

not the point here jizz for brains
Spewie said NZer's don't care much for RL .... he was rightly shown up to be a blithering git when I pointed out . compared to the Swines in Sydney ...
they are the biggest thing in town

end of [/quote]
not if you consider all forms of support like attendance and memberships

Theyve averaged as low as 8k home attendance and currently average 17k. Where are these fans?

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

If Foxtel released their ratings for each capital city then we could better analyse their ratings. Sydney has the countries highest uptake of subscribers, so no doubt there would be plenty watching the Swans in Sydney on Fox Footy. What's the bet your samples are selected as well?

it aint hard to estimate boof head

if the swines can only get on average 50K veiwers in Sydney on FTA & that represents 100% of Sydneysiders
& pay represents 33% of Sydneysiders

whats the average number of them watching on pay ?
I know maths is an issue for you but have a crack at it

Swans games on 7mate usually range from 65k to 90k. Fox Footy matches involving the Swans normally get around 200,000. Let's say 30% of that 200,000 were Sydney siders, then you would have another 60,000 from Sydney watching on pay. So overall the figures are very similar to that of the Warriors. Add the Giants to the ratings, and you have AFL in NSW > NZ Warriors.

where do I begin with this drivel

the Swines didn't get to 90K once for a H&A game in 2012 , their highest was 82K ( in rnd 1 V the ants )
they didn't get near that number again.
they averaged about 50K

& why would that same number watch on a service that 66% less households have access to .....

no .. of course .. they wouldn't
it would be a 3rd of the FTA figure on average ... thats 17K

67K for the Swines
probs another 40 or so for the midgets

thats 107K approx ... well , well behind the warriors

you've been schooled

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

given theyre on a secondary digital channel and simulcast on Foxtel id say the Swans did very well.

the warriors are on pay you **** halfwit ..... 100% of Sydneysiders have access to the secondary digital channels
I'd doubt anymore then 33% of NZers have access to pay

I'd say the swines are considerably less popular in Sydney .. then the warriors are in NZ

and here endith another debate with a clear & decisive victory to the leaguies

if you count TV as a measure of popularity. Attendance and memberships are also indicators arent they Dave?

not the point here jizz for brains
Spewie said NZer's don't care much for RL .... he was rightly shown up to be a blithering git when I pointed out . compared to the Swines in Sydney ...
they are the biggest thing in town

end of [/quote]
not if you consider all forms of support like attendance and memberships

Theyve averaged as low as 8k home attendance and currently average 17k. Where are these fans?[/quote]

hmmmmm , so we add the TV numbers to the attendances

so its 170K for the warriors
&
92K for the swines

neeeexxxtttttttt................

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Ratings for the Giants and Swans on 7mate and Foxtel in Sydney combined would beat the Warriors in NZ.

Sydneysiders think of Australian Football as Australia's game, and rl as a a bogans version of union.

here is a sample of ratings for the warriors in NZ from May n June this year
they were going shithouse at the time as well


Warriors on MNF....120k ( this one started at 9pm NZ time & finished at 11pm
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/06/tv-r...-11-june-2012/

Previous week v Storm 200k Sunday afternoon
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/06/tv-ratings-3-june-2012/

v Tigers on Friday night 140k
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/05/tv-ratings-18-may-2012/

Roosters at Home Saturday eve 145k
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/05/tv-ratings-12-may-2012/

the average for this sample was 152K a game
can you please point me to the ratings for club games for the swines & midgets in Sydney .. that beat these figures
or in fact ... get anywhere F.ucking near them you demented @rse clown


spewie ....

If Foxtel released their ratings for each capital city then we could better analyse their ratings. Sydney has the countries highest uptake of subscribers, so no doubt there would be plenty watching the Swans in Sydney on Fox Footy. What's the bet your samples are selected as well?

But but but but but but but but but

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Ratings for the Giants and Swans on 7mate and Foxtel in Sydney combined would beat the Warriors in NZ.

Sydneysiders think of Australian Football as Australia's game, and rl as a a bogans version of union.

here is a sample of ratings for the warriors in NZ from May n June this year
they were going shithouse at the time as well


Warriors on MNF....120k ( this one started at 9pm NZ time & finished at 11pm
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/06/tv-r...-11-june-2012/

Previous week v Storm 200k Sunday afternoon
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/06/tv-ratings-3-june-2012/

v Tigers on Friday night 140k
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/05/tv-ratings-18-may-2012/

Roosters at Home Saturday eve 145k
http://www.throng.co.nz/2012/05/tv-ratings-12-may-2012/

the average for this sample was 152K a game
can you please point me to the ratings for club games for the swines & midgets in Sydney .. that beat these figures
or in fact ... get anywhere F.ucking near them you demented @rse clown

given theyre on a secondary digital channel and simulcast on Foxtel id say the Swans did very well.

But but but but but


But the Warriors were on Pay TV and most of their away games aren't televised in NZ till 9:30 at night because they are two hours ahead of us, it's not fair damnit

Now to these vFL games that can't touch the Warriors even though they are shown live on FTA every week

More but but buts from the two arseclowns, if you can't beat their TV ratings, talk about crowds shift shift

Yeah, let's have a look at the Warriors crowds shall we?

Hmm, not bad for a place that doesn't give a shit, now let's look at the vFL side based over there .....




















Looking ....













































Still looking ......



















































Arhhhh fuck it, I give up

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

If Foxtel released their ratings for each capital city then we could better analyse their ratings. Sydney has the countries highest uptake of subscribers, so no doubt there would be plenty watching the Swans in Sydney on Fox Footy. What's the bet your samples are selected as well?

it aint hard to estimate boof head

if the swines can only get on average 50K veiwers in Sydney on FTA & that represents 100% of Sydneysiders
& pay represents 33% of Sydneysiders

whats the average number of them watching on pay ?
I know maths is an issue for you but have a crack at it

Swans games on 7mate usually range from 65k to 90k. Fox Footy matches involving the Swans normally get around 200,000. Let's say 30% of that 200,000 were Sydney siders, then you would have another 60,000 from Sydney watching on pay. So overall the figures are very similar to that of the Warriors. Add the Giants to the ratings, and you have AFL in NSW > NZ Warriors.

where do I begin with this drivel

the Swines didn't get to 90K once for a H&A game in 2012 , their highest was 82K ( in rnd 1 V the ants )
they didn't get near that number again.
they averaged about 50K

& why would that same number watch on a service that 66% less households have access to .....

no .. of course .. they wouldn't
it would be a 3rd of the FTA figure on average ... thats 17K

67K for the Swines
probs another 40 or so for the midgets

thats 107K approx ... well , well behind the warriors

you've been schooled [/quote]
How often did the Swans even get less than 50k once on 7mate? Probably only once or twice. The third of the FTA figre is the Foxtel figure?

I think we should go on the more accurate theory based on the fact that over 30% of Foxtel subscribers come from Sydney, and with the Swans playing a lot of Sydneysiders would be tuning in. So around 60k from Sydney tuning into the football on Fox Footy. A lot of people from Sydney would have subscribed to Foxtel years ago so they could get decent coverage of the football, back when 7 would delay all games except the Swans matches.

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

If Foxtel released their ratings for each capital city then we could better analyse their ratings. Sydney has the countries highest uptake of subscribers, so no doubt there would be plenty watching the Swans in Sydney on Fox Footy. What's the bet your samples are selected as well?

it aint hard to estimate boof head

if the swines can only get on average 50K veiwers in Sydney on FTA & that represents 100% of Sydneysiders
& pay represents 33% of Sydneysiders

whats the average number of them watching on pay ?
I know maths is an issue for you but have a crack at it

Swans games on 7mate usually range from 65k to 90k. Fox Footy matches involving the Swans normally get around 200,000. Let's say 30% of that 200,000 were Sydney siders, then you would have another 60,000 from Sydney watching on pay. So overall the figures are very similar to that of the Warriors. Add the Giants to the ratings, and you have AFL in NSW > NZ Warriors.

where do I begin with this drivel

the Swines didn't get to 90K once for a H&A game in 2012 , their highest was 82K ( in rnd 1 V the ants )
they didn't get near that number again.
they averaged about 50K

& why would that same number watch on a service that 66% less households have access to .....

no .. of course .. they wouldn't
it would be a 3rd of the FTA figure on average ... thats 17K

67K for the Swines
probs another 40 or so for the midgets

thats 107K approx ... well , well behind the warriors

you've been schooled [/quote]
How often did the Swans even get less than 50k once on 7mate? Probably only once or twice. The third of the FTA figre is the Foxtel figure?

I think we should go on the more accurate theory based on the fact that over 30% of Foxtel subscribers come from Sydney, and with the Swans playing a lot of Sydneysiders would be tuning in. So around 60k from Sydney tuning into the football on Fox Footy. A lot of people from Sydney would have subscribed to Foxtel years ago so they could get decent coverage of the football, back when 7 would delay all games except the Swans matches.[/quote]

How often did the Swans even get less than 50k once on 7mate? Probably only once or twice

11 times in 2012

& again
if 50K are veiwing from a service available to everyone
it is not feasible ... for the same amount to be watching on a service that 66% less people in that same market have access to

Sydneysiders sign up to foxtel .. to watch NRL when watching sport ... & NRL .. only
again
you've been schooled

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

If Foxtel released their ratings for each capital city then we could better analyse their ratings. Sydney has the countries highest uptake of subscribers, so no doubt there would be plenty watching the Swans in Sydney on Fox Footy. What's the bet your samples are selected as well?

it aint hard to estimate boof head

if the swines can only get on average 50K veiwers in Sydney on FTA & that represents 100% of Sydneysiders
& pay represents 33% of Sydneysiders

whats the average number of them watching on pay ?
I know maths is an issue for you but have a crack at it

Swans games on 7mate usually range from 65k to 90k. Fox Footy matches involving the Swans normally get around 200,000. Let's say 30% of that 200,000 were Sydney siders, then you would have another 60,000 from Sydney watching on pay. So overall the figures are very similar to that of the Warriors. Add the Giants to the ratings, and you have AFL in NSW > NZ Warriors.

where do I begin with this drivel

the Swines didn't get to 90K once for a H&A game in 2012 , their highest was 82K ( in rnd 1 V the ants )
they didn't get near that number again.
they averaged about 50K

& why would that same number watch on a service that 66% less households have access to .....

no .. of course .. they wouldn't
it would be a 3rd of the FTA figure on average ... thats 17K

67K for the Swines
probs another 40 or so for the midgets

thats 107K approx ... well , well behind the warriors

you've been schooled [/quote]
How often did the Swans even get less than 50k once on 7mate? Probably only once or twice. The third of the FTA figre is the Foxtel figure?

I think we should go on the more accurate theory based on the fact that over 30% of Foxtel subscribers come from Sydney, and with the Swans playing a lot of Sydneysiders would be tuning in. So around 60k from Sydney tuning into the football on Fox Footy. A lot of people from Sydney would have subscribed to Foxtel years ago so they could get decent coverage of the football, back when 7 would delay all games except the Swans matches.[/quote]

How often did the Swans even get less than 50k once on 7mate? Probably only once or twice

11 times in 2012

& again
if 50K are veiwing from a service available to everyone
it is not feasible ... for the same amount to be watching on a service that 66% less people in that same market have access to

Sydneysiders sign up to foxtel .. to watch NRL when watching sport ... & NRL .. only
again
you've been schooled [/quote]
Not feasible in your dented brain, but it certainly is possible. And in this case, probable.

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

If Foxtel released their ratings for each capital city then we could better analyse their ratings. Sydney has the countries highest uptake of subscribers, so no doubt there would be plenty watching the Swans in Sydney on Fox Footy. What's the bet your samples are selected as well?

it aint hard to estimate boof head

if the swines can only get on average 50K veiwers in Sydney on FTA & that represents 100% of Sydneysiders
& pay represents 33% of Sydneysiders

whats the average number of them watching on pay ?
I know maths is an issue for you but have a crack at it

Swans games on 7mate usually range from 65k to 90k. Fox Footy matches involving the Swans normally get around 200,000. Let's say 30% of that 200,000 were Sydney siders, then you would have another 60,000 from Sydney watching on pay. So overall the figures are very similar to that of the Warriors. Add the Giants to the ratings, and you have AFL in NSW > NZ Warriors.

where do I begin with this drivel

the Swines didn't get to 90K once for a H&A game in 2012 , their highest was 82K ( in rnd 1 V the ants )
they didn't get near that number again.
they averaged about 50K

& why would that same number watch on a service that 66% less households have access to .....

no .. of course .. they wouldn't
it would be a 3rd of the FTA figure on average ... thats 17K

67K for the Swines
probs another 40 or so for the midgets

thats 107K approx ... well , well behind the warriors

you've been schooled [/quote]
How often did the Swans even get less than 50k once on 7mate? Probably only once or twice. The third of the FTA figre is the Foxtel figure?

I think we should go on the more accurate theory based on the fact that over 30% of Foxtel subscribers come from Sydney, and with the Swans playing a lot of Sydneysiders would be tuning in. So around 60k from Sydney tuning into the football on Fox Footy. A lot of people from Sydney would have subscribed to Foxtel years ago so they could get decent coverage of the football, back when 7 would delay all games except the Swans matches.[/quote]

How often did the Swans even get less than 50k once on 7mate? Probably only once or twice

11 times in 2012

& again
if 50K are veiwing from a service available to everyone
it is not feasible ... for the same amount to be watching on a service that 66% less people in that same market have access to

Sydneysiders sign up to foxtel .. to watch NRL when watching sport ... & NRL .. only
again
you've been schooled [/quote]
Not feasible in your dented brain, but it certainly is possible. And in this case, probable.[/quote]

but .... but , but ..I know its true

oh look out here we go
his bottom lip is quivering ...............

and


there it is

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

If Foxtel released their ratings for each capital city then we could better analyse their ratings. Sydney has the countries highest uptake of subscribers, so no doubt there would be plenty watching the Swans in Sydney on Fox Footy. What's the bet your samples are selected as well?

it aint hard to estimate boof head

if the swines can only get on average 50K veiwers in Sydney on FTA & that represents 100% of Sydneysiders
& pay represents 33% of Sydneysiders

whats the average number of them watching on pay ?
I know maths is an issue for you but have a crack at it

Swans games on 7mate usually range from 65k to 90k. Fox Footy matches involving the Swans normally get around 200,000. Let's say 30% of that 200,000 were Sydney siders, then you would have another 60,000 from Sydney watching on pay. So overall the figures are very similar to that of the Warriors. Add the Giants to the ratings, and you have AFL in NSW > NZ Warriors.

where do I begin with this drivel

the Swines didn't get to 90K once for a H&A game in 2012 , their highest was 82K ( in rnd 1 V the ants )
they didn't get near that number again.
they averaged about 50K

& why would that same number watch on a service that 66% less households have access to .....

no .. of course .. they wouldn't
it would be a 3rd of the FTA figure on average ... thats 17K

67K for the Swines
probs another 40 or so for the midgets

thats 107K approx ... well , well behind the warriors

you've been schooled [/quote]
How often did the Swans even get less than 50k once on 7mate? Probably only once or twice. The third of the FTA figre is the Foxtel figure?

I think we should go on the more accurate theory based on the fact that over 30% of Foxtel subscribers come from Sydney, and with the Swans playing a lot of Sydneysiders would be tuning in. So around 60k from Sydney tuning into the football on Fox Footy. A lot of people from Sydney would have subscribed to Foxtel years ago so they could get decent coverage of the football, back when 7 would delay all games except the Swans matches.[/quote]

How often did the Swans even get less than 50k once on 7mate? Probably only once or twice

11 times in 2012

& again
if 50K are veiwing from a service available to everyone
it is not feasible ... for the same amount to be watching on a service that 66% less people in that same market have access to

Sydneysiders sign up to foxtel .. to watch NRL when watching sport ... & NRL .. only
again
you've been schooled [/quote]
Not feasible in your dented brain, but it certainly is possible. And in this case, probable.[/quote]

but .... but , but ..I know its true

oh look out here we go
his bottom lip is quivering ...............

and


there it is

[/quote]
What is it with your unhealthy obsession with butt?

He's got a bit of an obsession with posting little kids crying as well. Kids watch out. ol' man Dave is coming to get ya!

Striker wrote:

And the Storm!!

The NRL should tell 9 either accept the draw, or "You've reneged on the deal so we're cancelling it!".

As if you poor bastards could pay back the advance they already gave you.

That aside, Rugby League is still owned and operated by a media companies. Way to go ARLC.

Bahahahaha, smell Beas fear.