NRL thug murderer

[AFL Warrior]

King Klan Klutz KKK Coward forgive me while I remain dried eyed. I could not care if other sportspeople have been charged with murder...OJ Simpson is a good example but he was found innocent in the end. This thread is about the nrl and alleged nrl murderers...get it?

[King-Eliagh]

Yeah we all know an ex nrl player has been charged with murder. So what's this thread really about? Work hard to be clear to us all now Mr scramble brains.

[AFL Warrior]

Well remember that then you A.O. Neville wannabe

[King-Eliagh]

'Warrior' you havent been able to answer one question pick up yer game jackass!

[AFL Warrior]

Well there is nothing to answer to your racist utterances King Klan Klutz Grand Wizard.

[King-Eliagh]

Well there is nothing to answer to your racist utterances King Klan Klutz Grand Wizard.

Oh dear. Looks as though we have submission. This porkchop is completely fried. It cant even answer what the thread is about.

Thread over.

[TLPG]

This thread is about the nrl and alleged nrl murderers...get it?

I would have thought that was clear as glass!

Needed to be said.

[King-Eliagh]

This thread is about the nrl and alleged nrl murderers...get it?

I would have thought that was clear as glass!

Needed to be said.

No TLPG my dumb companion, that's the title . The "NRL and alleged nrl murderers means jack diddly by itselt. Look I can see what the thread is about, so I'll answer my question for the pair of you bone brains. It's about slandering the nrl and nrl players as murdererous and thuglike. Since you chumps and others tried to make this point I've identified the most lauded players ever in the AFL, and one of the AFL's most upcoming rising stars as:

1. Someone with the nicname of 'God' who has been closely connected to the deaths of two people in highly suspect circumstances. (ohh the irony! )
2. Someone with the nicname of King who was happy to have an affair with his best mates wife...for years. (hohohooooooh the irony! )
3. Someone who i think took the mark of the year last year and was one of the AFL's most promising young guns who recently apparently took to others with a machete.

I'm sorry folks but the shows over here. Your pathetic attempt to identify an ex RL player who apparently has accidentally murdered someone as representative of the NRL organisation has failed dismally...unless you also agree the AFL and AFL players can be represented in a similar manner. I've completely trashed your lamo thread and alls you crackpots could come back at me with was "you're racist" because one of the players i referred to is Aboriginal :_<> . I think i've mentioned aliens and their abduction of people in conversation before too folks...does that make me racist to them? This thread is a goners, kaput, over, done for...dead.

Tada

[TLPG]

No you are the murderer now, trying to kill a thread because it accurately embarrasses your precious thugby!

Won't work!

And you're off topic now by the way!

[King-Eliagh]

*cough bullshit

This thread was dead before it started. I just conducted the analysis for all to see how lifeless it is.

Nice try TLPG. But as per usual you got nothing above, barr the desperate yelpings of a pre pubescent child.

TLPGs comeback = "No you are bad".

No substance but priceless all the same.

[pookus]

The examples that you give aren't randomly violent in there nature. Dogs all there of them agreed but completely off point. Surely the point of this thread is to point out the more violent nature of rugby league players and there supporters.This is a sport that thinks it is ok to beat the shit out of eachother in the name of so called passion and there supporters love it. as K E has shown on another thread. So isn't it safe to assume that a game that is prides itself on its own violence should attract people who are more violent.

[King-Eliagh]

The examples that you give aren't randomly violent in there nature. Dogs all there of them agreed but completely off point. Surely the point of this thread is to point out the more violent nature of rugby league players and there supporters.This is a sport that thinks it is ok to beat the **** out of eachother in the name of so called passion and there supporters love it. as K E has shown on another thread. So isn't it safe to assume that a game that is prides itself on its own violence should attract people who are more violent.

Excellent post pookus. Now we can finally start working together at assessing this rubbish. Your key word there is randomly. You imo have simply assumed Field walked up to this bloke and hit him in the head, randomly. What you fail to see is this, as in RL, isnt the the case. There was an argument which had been boiling over for a long time. In RL the reasons fist fights start are generally to a perceived or real injustice which has occurred.

Police allege the three got into an argument at the Kingscliff Hotel on the far north coast while drinking on Sunday afternoon but it wasn't until the pub was closing about 9.15pm that a fight broke out in the carpark...Police Superintendent Stuart Wilkins said: "There was a confrontation during the afternoon and evening and at the closing of the hotel it moved to the carpark where it took a violent turn.

"They knew each other. It was one significant punch that led this man to fall to the ground and hit his head, which has caused significant injuries."

Now your assumption that the NRL prides itself on violence is codswallop, nothing more. The game prides itself on being the toughest footy code in the country which produces the best athletes out of all the footy codes, and rightly so. The violence of players and explayers in either code has nothing to do with the code itself. Violence is throughout all societies. There are far better and accurate reasons for its eruptions than what you turkeys suggest. "Its because of the code"

Chris 'hows about i dislocate your shoulder for no reason' Judd anyone? Add him to my list

[King-Eliagh]

Oh yeah and TLPG and AFL'Warrior' dont forget to call me a racist for mentioning Chris Judd above :_<>

[pookus]

The examples that you give aren't randomly violent in there nature. Dogs all there of them agreed but completely off point. Surely the point of this thread is to point out the more violent nature of rugby league players and there supporters.This is a sport that thinks it is ok to beat the **** out of eachother in the name of so called passion and there supporters love it. as K E has shown on another thread. So isn't it safe to assume that a game that is prides itself on its own violence should attract people who are more violent.

Excellent post pookus. Now we can finally start working together at assessing this rubbish. Your key word there is randomly. You imo have simply assumed Field walked up to this bloke and hit him in the head, randomly. What you fail to see is this, as in RL, isnt the the case. There was an argument which had been boiling over for a long time. In RL the reasons fist fights start are generally to a perceived or real injustice which has occurred.

Police allege the three got into an argument at the Kingscliff Hotel on the far north coast while drinking on Sunday afternoon but it wasn't until the pub was closing about 9.15pm that a fight broke out in the carpark...Police Superintendent Stuart Wilkins said: "There was a confrontation during the afternoon and evening and at the closing of the hotel it moved to the carpark where it took a violent turn.

"They knew each other. It was one significant punch that led this man to fall to the ground and hit his head, which has caused significant injuries."

Now your assumption that the NRL prides itself on violence is codswallop, nothing more. The game prides itself on being the toughest footy code in the country which produces the best athletes out of all the footy codes, and rightly so. The violence of players and explayers in either code has nothing to do with the code itself. Violence is throughout all societies. There are far better and accurate reasons for its eruptions than what you turkeys suggest. "Its because of the code"

Chris 'hows about i dislocate your shoulder for no reason' Judd anyone? Add him to my list

K E you can't have it both ways.Img the other thread you say that it is ok to use violence to offset violence on the footy field and you say they should encourage it.of course the game is not responsible for this dog act. but you have to ask yourself if you submerge your self in a sport that encourages its players to sort out there problems with there fists won't it lead to a lessening of sensitivity on the dangers of this practice. In other words if I have been encouraged to punch anything that challenges me aren't I more inclined to do this in all walks of life. I think you'll find a lot of research that says violence begets violence

[King-Eliagh]

Now you still have it slightly wrong. The NRL doesnt encourage players to sort things out with their fists. The NRL takes into account the context in which a player resorts to violence. If Judd was on the NRL field and copped a good snotting in the noggin after his dislocation of a players shoulder for no reason the nrl would rightly look lightly upon the punch. I couldnt agree more with swift punishment from the players in this cirucmstance. In the end it builds sportsmanship and morals within a code. These guys arent thugs they're generally just sticking up for their mates and not accepting unsportsmanlike behaviour which are fine values to hold. Yes there's the odd thug on the NRL field but they're not representative of the code and this is no different on the AFL field.

Now in terms of violence begetting violence i agree...when a cheap shot occurs in the AFL comp the players dont miss it and are much more likely to throw cheap shots back striaght away or at a later time. When those cheap shots are not penalised or punished properly they are in effect endorsed. So why not let the players have some say on unsportsmanlike behaviour? In the end the players are the actual sportsman right?

Lets stop the mollycoddling of players. Both marngrook and RL are very violent sports, there's much more incidents of highly dangerous events which occur in the normal flow of play than I've ever seen in the fisticuffs. Jonathon Browns incident comes to mind...