Seems like you were too simple to see this Xman? Hence i should not post concepts and questions which you lot can not comprehend any longer. What about crowds? You know anything about crowd numbers in the AFL vis a vis the nrl xman?

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
I understand it. You don't. So please explain to us your definition.King-Eliagh wrote:TLPG wrote:All of them, KE! ALL of them! Given that you refuse to specify your definition of "working class" I'm counting all definitions!still battling with the commonly used term working class i see TLPG
keep at it matey, you'll understand it one day.
![]()
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Almost every Australian has access to ARs, and certainly more than RL because of its national spread. rL dominates NSW and QLD. Maybe you are trying to say that NSW have a higher proportion of working class people?King-Eliagh wrote:My use of accessible is in reference to those who can access and succeed in the elite level of the sport. I thought this was quite clear in my opening post where i highlighted those nsw SOO players, the majority of whom were from working class syd suburbs and nsw rural towns, who'd made it to the pinnacle.
Seems like you were too simple to see this Xman? Hence i should not post concepts and questions which you lot can not comprehend any longer. What about crowds? You know anything about crowd numbers in the AFL vis a vis the nrl xman?
As i said if you didnt understand the concept of working class you neednt have bothered in the first place. Instead you went on and on about wanting to know what working class means when it was just a click of the finger away on google. You really havew made a right twat of yourself in this thread and thank god you've come to the right decision to disengage. Good riddance dumbo.TLPG wrote:You're an idiot. As you won't explain yourself properly, it is obvious yet again that you are a lazy ignoramus.
Bye bye.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Interesting points Xman. I'd have to disagree though with your take on the term accessible. RU is a very similar game to RL however it is less accessible in working class suburbs. Less clubs, and influence in schools. 'Appealing to a working class level of education' is a bit smarmy of you and its not what im getting at. So my next question, which im pretty sure i asked before (it takes a while with you slower ones) is what's the lay of the land of clubs and influence in melbourne? Is it like i first thought with AFL footy clubs and influence in schools etc just as prevalent in working class as in upperclass suburbs and in public and prive schools in melbourne? Or is it like RL in sydney, more prominent in the working class suburbs? Or, is it like RU in sydney, more prominent in the upperclass suburbs? Not being from melbourne i wouldnt have the foggiest on this one...Xman wrote:Almost every Australian has access to ARs, and certainly more than RL because of its national spread. rL dominates NSW and QLD. Maybe you are trying to say that NSW have a higher proportion of working class people?King-Eliagh wrote:My use of accessible is in reference to those who can access and succeed in the elite level of the sport. I thought this was quite clear in my opening post where i highlighted those nsw SOO players, the majority of whom were from working class syd suburbs and nsw rural towns, who'd made it to the pinnacle.
Seems like you were too simple to see this Xman? Hence i should not post concepts and questions which you lot can not comprehend any longer. What about crowds? You know anything about crowd numbers in the AFL vis a vis the nrl xman?after all it is known as a working class game compared to say RU.
This doesn't mean it's more accessible.It would mean its a simple game that may very well appeal to a working class level of education.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?