Talking Footy

Ahh melbourne and brisbane receive thrashings each week they play a team in the middle or top tier Xman. In fact your use of the term "top tier" after two rounds of footy is indicative of the chasm. You and everyone else already know who the top four are...after round two! Acknowledge the problem Xman.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ahh melbourne and brisbane receive thrashings each week they play a team in the middle or top tier Xman. In fact your use of the term "top tier" after two rounds of footy is indicative of the chasm. You and everyone else already know who the top four are...after round two! Acknowledge the problem Xman.

Melbourne will lift. They had a disappointing week 1 and a virtually unwinnable week2

Brisbane won week one and got rolled by an ominous Carlton.

Both are far from basket cases. Claiming they are after 2 rounds shows your ignorance!

Oh they're basket cases alright and I'm not claiming it after round 2. I'm claiming it after last season.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Oh they're basket cases alright and I'm not claiming it after round 2. I'm claiming it after last season.

So according to you Geelong will win the GF then! WC made you look pretty stupid recently, so did hawthorn. Both changed drastically from one season to the next.

A basket case is a team that barely wins a game at all. This does not describe either Brisbane, Richmond or Melbourne this year.

How did westcoast make me look stupid? Xman you're dribbling poo again matey. I never said anything about westcoast, geelong or hawthorn. I'm talking about melbourne and brisbane. So lets see who's right on this one mid season shall we? You are the one who will look pretty stupid as you're suggesting they will be competitive. And lets not forget they'll get a few wins, against eachother, maybe richmond and the GC and GWS But we cant really call them wins given the scores of late now can we?

Midseason...Maybe then you'll acknowledge the problem Xman.

King-Eliagh wrote:

How did westcoast make me look stupid? Xman you're dribbling poo again matey. I never said anything about westcoast, geelong or hawthorn. I'm talking about melbourne and brisbane. So lets see who's right on this one mid season shall we? You are the one who will look pretty stupid as you're suggesting they will be competitive. And lets not forget they'll get a few wins, against eachother, maybe richmond and the GC and GWS But we cant really call them wins given the scores of late now can we?

Midseason...Maybe then you'll acknowledge the problem Xman.

Because you're using last years form to say a team this year will be uncompetitive!

The WC rose from bottom one year to play finals the next from memory. Your theory stinks like you!

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ahh melbourne and brisbane receive thrashings each week they play a team in the middle or top tier Xman. In fact your use of the term "top tier" after two rounds of footy is indicative of the chasm. You and everyone else already know who the top four are...after round two! Acknowledge the problem Xman.

Melbourne will lift. They had a disappointing week 1 and a virtually unwinnable week2

Brisbane won week one and got rolled by an ominous Carlton.

Both are far from basket cases. Claiming they are after 2 rounds shows your ignorance!

but but but .. derp derp derp
no... its not the delltones
its Xman !!

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ahh melbourne and brisbane receive thrashings each week they play a team in the middle or top tier Xman. In fact your use of the term "top tier" after two rounds of footy is indicative of the chasm. You and everyone else already know who the top four are...after round two! Acknowledge the problem Xman.

Melbourne will lift. They had a disappointing week 1 and a virtually unwinnable week2

Brisbane won week one and got rolled by an ominous Carlton.

Both are far from basket cases. Claiming they are after 2 rounds shows your ignorance!

but but but .. derp derp derp
no... its not the delltones
its Xman !!

Derp, a RL term. It means nothing to anyone with an IQ over 50. But to you it seems to mean something.

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

How did westcoast make me look stupid? Xman you're dribbling poo again matey. I never said anything about westcoast, geelong or hawthorn. I'm talking about melbourne and brisbane. So lets see who's right on this one mid season shall we? You are the one who will look pretty stupid as you're suggesting they will be competitive. And lets not forget they'll get a few wins, against eachother, maybe richmond and the GC and GWS But we cant really call them wins given the scores of late now can we?

Midseason...Maybe then you'll acknowledge the problem Xman.

Because you're using last years form to say a team this year will be uncompetitive!

The WC rose from bottom one year to play finals the next from memory. Your theory stinks like you!

I dont give a rats what the WCE did. My theory, as opposed to yours, is based on knowledge of the current sides and competition, not a different side and even which happened years ago derp boy. So lets look see how my theory stands up against yours midseason shall we Xman?

And no more but but but's or derp derp derps from you sonny jim.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

How did westcoast make me look stupid? Xman you're dribbling poo again matey. I never said anything about westcoast, geelong or hawthorn. I'm talking about melbourne and brisbane. So lets see who's right on this one mid season shall we? You are the one who will look pretty stupid as you're suggesting they will be competitive. And lets not forget they'll get a few wins, against eachother, maybe richmond and the GC and GWS But we cant really call them wins given the scores of late now can we?

Midseason...Maybe then you'll acknowledge the problem Xman.

Because you're using last years form to say a team this year will be uncompetitive!

The WC rose from bottom one year to play finals the next from memory. Your theory stinks like you!

I dont give a rats what the WCE did. My theory, as opposed to yours, is based on knowledge of the current sides and competition, not a different side and even which happened years ago derp boy. So lets look see how my theory stands up against yours midseason shall we Xman?

And no more but but but's or derp derp derps from you sonny jim.

Neither Melbourne or Richmond were basket cases last year anyway, unless your calling all teams in the lower 3rd of the ladder basket cases! both beat teams above them and were competitive in losses.

Melbourne were basketcases in the second half of last season Xman. Face reality mate. Things'll be ok in the end, its just now the AFL have really stuffed up and they need to do things about it. Their first step is also yours...acknowledging there's a big F off problem.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Melbourne were basketcases in the second half of last season Xman. Face reality mate. Things'll be ok in the end, its just now the AFL have really stuffed up and they need to do things about it. Their first step is also yours...acknowledging there's a big F off problem.

Second half!

You really do know nothing about AFL!

Teams filled with young players begin to struggle towards the end of the year due to the workload on their developing physiques. This is why Melbourne are expected to improve this year. All these young players have had another preseason to physically develop enough to cope with another full AFL season.

You're as dopey as they come!

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Melbourne were basketcases in the second half of last season Xman. Face reality mate. Things'll be ok in the end, its just now the AFL have really stuffed up and they need to do things about it. Their first step is also yours...acknowledging there's a big F off problem.

Second half!

You really do know nothing about AFL!

Teams filled with young players begin to struggle towards the end of the year due to the workload on their developing physiques. This is why Melbourne are expected to improve this year. All these young players have had another preseason to physically develop enough to cope with another full AFL season.

You're as dopey as they come!

but, but, but....

derp, derp, derp...

I usually wouldnt copy others posts but Raider hits the nail square onto your head with the buts and derps here Xman "But they're young and developing"

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Melbourne were basketcases in the second half of last season Xman. Face reality mate. Things'll be ok in the end, its just now the AFL have really stuffed up and they need to do things about it. Their first step is also yours...acknowledging there's a big F off problem.

Second half!

You really do know nothing about AFL!

Teams filled with young players begin to struggle towards the end of the year due to the workload on their developing physiques. This is why Melbourne are expected to improve this year. All these young players have had another preseason to physically develop enough to cope with another full AFL season.

You're as dopey as they come!

but, but, but....

derp, derp, derp...

I usually wouldnt copy others posts but Raider hits the nail square onto your head with the buts and derps here Xman "But they're young and developing"

Further proof you have no idea about ARs and the AFL!