Talking Footy

KE, you are an idiot. There is no evidence that the Swan ran dead. None. I don't need to prove that something doesn't exist. It doesn't exist. You (or Raider) have to prove that it does. And I won't shut up because Raider is going to get a BS point and you are running so blind you'll run onto the Harbour Bridge and off into the water and not realise what you've done until it's too late!! You're trolling - pure and simple.

No, Beau. I've already explained in PM to you more than once why I'm not doing that. Please don't ask me again.

Well there is only really evidence the swans ran out at less than full strength. They ran their rookies out and they couldn't get near where the bookies marked them with the line betting at 100+. Where's the evidence they ran out at full steam TLPG?

And beaussie stop asking tlpg, he's already in the fight club quite often. And this file, the bs file is a part of the FC. He's in here bearsy just let him be.

They were playing a new team for the first time, troll. Now if you haven't got any proof that helps Raider get out.

Exactly TLPG, they were playing a new team for the first time so they were happy to take it easy, as ordered. This way they avoid injuries and give young players a shot. And if any of their mates were gambling types and were in the know, they could win bundles on the line betting. Its win win win TLPG! I'd say there's quite some evidence they ran dead out there. Cant seem to see any evidence to the contrary though ... *insert crickets chirping noise here

King-Eliagh wrote:

Well there is only really evidence the swans ran out at less than full strength.

Where is the evidence that the Swans went out under strength?

Maybe we're looking at 2 bs points.

King-Eliagh wrote:

This way they avoid injuries and give young players a shot.

I thought you knew something about AR KE!
Any true AR player knows you'll get injured if you go in half hearted.
And please tell us what rookies we used in preference to seniors by the Swans
because you're looking at an extra bs point.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Exactly TLPG, they were playing a new team for the first time so they were happy to take it easy, as ordered. This way they avoid injuries and give young players a shot. And if any of their mates were gambling types and were in the know, they could win bundles on the line betting. Its win win win TLPG! I'd say there's quite some evidence they ran dead out there. Cant seem to see any evidence to the contrary though ... *insert crickets chirping noise here

Douche bag. Raider, and now you, made the claim. Prove it or the BS point is yours.

cos789 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

This way they avoid injuries and give young players a shot.

I thought you knew something about AR KE!
Any true AR player knows you'll get injured if you go in half hearted.
And please tell us what rookies we used in preference to seniors by the Swans
because you're looking at an extra bs point.

I was talking about giving their top players a break and letting their rookies have a run you silly twatmouth. Now jetta and hannebury on the bench to start and the swans backline looks like almost all rookies to me. http://www.theroar.com.au/2012/03/24/gw ... ores-blog/

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Exactly TLPG, they were playing a new team for the first time so they were happy to take it easy, as ordered. This way they avoid injuries and give young players a shot. And if any of their mates were gambling types and were in the know, they could win bundles on the line betting. Its win win win TLPG! I'd say there's quite some evidence they ran dead out there. Cant seem to see any evidence to the contrary though ... *insert crickets chirping noise here

Douche bag. Raider, and now you, made the claim. Prove it or the BS point is yours.

Shezus took you long enough.

May I have 10?

Meanwhile there's been quite some evidence to suggest they did run dead, as ordered whereas nothing has been provided to suggest otherwise. You guys are sure lamo

There is NO evidence that they ran dead! You haven't delivered one scrap of bona fide proof. All you've brought forward is your own opinionated twaddle that seeks to make proverbial wine out of Adelaide tap water!

Fact - the Swan were feeling out the new side. North Melbourne will probably do the same. That's not running dead at all and to suggest that it is borders on crazed - and deserves a BS point! Good call, Xman!

There's plenty of evidence. "Feeling out a side" is not running at full steam, its closer to running dead, which is looking more and more likely what was ordered on the night. The end scoreline suggests the same.

By the way TLPG i like the wine out of adeliade water analogy.

That's your opinion - and it's not backed up by proper evidence. Fact - if a team runs full steam at a new team, it is more likely to lose the game because they don't know what they're dealing with. North Melbourne went straight at Brisbane in Round 1 1987 instead of treating them with respect, and the Kangaroos lost.

Accept that you don't know what you're talking about, and you're doing nothing more than troll. As of now, I'm no longer feeding you here.

Look there's no way of proving they ran dead, I'll accept that as you should accept there's no way of proving otherwise. But atleast I've had a shot at it, you've done nothing but moan and curse TLPG. And to tell you the truth it looks more likely they were ordered to run dead/take it easy/whatever you want to term it, than otherwise.

Good day TLPG, it's been nice debating. Nice but not challenging.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Look there's no way of proving they ran dead, I'll accept that.

This is exactly why the bs file was created, bs claims that are not based on fact but are claimed as if they are. If Dave had said "I think ....." but he didn't. He stated it as if it was a known instruction.

Rule two of the BS file reads

2. Only challenged claims that are deemed appropriate by the TFC moderator will be entered into the BS file. Examples of inappropriate claims are: i. Predictions, ii. Clear personal opinions, iii. Issues that are impossible to prove, iv. Issues that are too big (eg: which is the bigger code)

Note the bolded area which you wrote yourself Xman. I'm sorry but this claim doesnt even belong here as it was clearly impossible to prove and disprove. TLPG has done a particularly poor job of disproving the claim. Well actually, he's done nothing.