Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Oh dear, Izzy went worse than I thought. I still have some hope but its fading fast.

The AFL spent 6 million on him didnt they?

Oh dear and how much has been lumped into the khunt experiment? The total could have paid for a lovely stadium in Darwin, but instead they've bought a pair of duds for promotion, which after seeing them play one game the novelty wears off and everyone thinks 'how dumb' and 'why?'

You still think the 'experts' down the AFL are clever Xman?

The fact we are talking about him again and again shows how clever they are. He is almost a weekly discussion point in the media and he hasn't even played an official game yet! To buy great media coverage like that would cost well over the fee he is paid that's for sure.

Yep, theyre very smart those AFL people.

yes the talk is glowing isn't it ....

a million a year for 3 hand passes a game

yeah .. they're real clever aren't they

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

I take this point, but you seem not to have listened to my second point regarding the novelty factor wearing off very quick. Imo this will have a counterproductive effect for the sport. I dont know whether you would be able to understand what I'm gettin at though Xman. You booked in for that labotomy yet?

The novelty hasn't worn off with the media yet. They are still printing stories about him, and KHunt almost weekly.
The fee both are paid has been more than covered by media exposure for th AFL.

Smart move really

they both will show on a weekly basis throughout 2012 .. to everyone.. what a desperate .. & failing code the VFL is outside of its **** heartland

not exactly publicity to die for

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Neither were the giants. They played more practice matches last year.

as a 2nd tier side you wombat

this was their first stab at the VFL
as a VFL side

a pre season comp game .... their first "real" game
& it was
a complete flop

VFL? I think you're confused. They played 1 AFL preseason game last year plus a season in the NSWFL. Youve got to research a bit better than that dopey.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

I take this point, but you seem not to have listened to my second point regarding the novelty factor wearing off very quick. Imo this will have a counterproductive effect for the sport. I dont know whether you would be able to understand what I'm gettin at though Xman. You booked in for that labotomy yet?

The novelty hasn't worn off with the media yet. They are still printing stories about him, and KHunt almost weekly.
The fee both are paid has been more than covered by media exposure for th AFL.

Smart move really

they both will show on a weekly basis throughout 2012 .. to everyone.. what a desperate .. & failing code the VFL is outside of its **** heartland

not exactly publicity to die for

They'll be discussed week after week, with countless opportunities for the AFL to be promoted in the NSW and QLD media. =D>

They say any exposure is good exposure but if i had kiddies and wanted them to play Victorian Rules i certainly wouldnt be taking them to see khunt play this season. He's an embarrassment for the code and a very unskillful player. The best mark i've seen him take was the uncontested one on the beach for the swiss add.

Xman he's bad news for the credibility of the code. We all know it. Thank god he's gettin a paycut soon but even that is not good enough. The gumby is taking another youngsters place just to make the competition more lopsided than it already is.

King-Eliagh wrote:

They say any exposure is good exposure but if i had kiddies and wanted them to play Victorian Rules i certainly wouldnt be taking them to see khunt play this season. He's an embarrassment for the code and a very unskillful player. The best mark i've seen him take was the uncontested one on the beach for the swiss add.

Xman he's bad news for the credibility of the code. We all know it. Thank god he's gettin a paycut soon but even that is not good enough. The gumby is taking another youngsters place just to make the competition more lopsided than it already is.

Yeah interesting how KHunt is an unskilled player but he was a champ in the NRL.

How many news reports about him are negative? Most talk about how he's going or the fact he's enjoying AFL or that he's decided to resign. Where is this negative publicity?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Neither were the giants. They played more practice matches last year.

as a 2nd tier side you wombat

this was their first stab at the VFL
as a VFL side

a pre season comp game .... their first "real" game
& it was
a complete flop

VFL? I think you're confused. They played 1 AFL preseason game last year plus a season in the NSWFL. Youve got to research a bit better than that dopey.

again

wot is this AFL ? ... Archers Football League ... Androids Football league Arseholes Football League

the name of your game is VFL
Victorian
because thats all it is
all it will ever be

Interesting. I wonder what the VFL is then?

http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... -118-0-0-0

The AFL have almost half their teams located outside Victoria. The NRL only 5 outside NSW/ACT.

NSWRL is far more accurate I think!

It's called the Australian Football League. Call it by it's correct name, Dave.

King-Eliagh wrote:

They say any exposure is good exposure but if i had kiddies and wanted them to play Victorian Rules i certainly wouldnt be taking them to see khunt play this season. He's an embarrassment for the code and a very unskillful player. The best mark i've seen him take was the uncontested one on the beach for the swiss add.

Xman he's bad news for the credibility of the code. We all know it. Thank god he's gettin a paycut soon but even that is not good enough. The gumby is taking another youngsters place just to make the competition more lopsided than it already is.

& watch him walk .... its a million plus
or off comes the singlet

why would anyone else subject themselves to Victorian Rules for a cent less when they've played far more interesting Challenging & demanding games

I hear both Izzy & Khunt will both be turning out for the Brisbane Bombers in 2015 anyway
back playing a real game

NSWAFL wrote:

It's called the Australian Football League. Call it by it's correct name, Dave.

Victorian

K

Xman wrote:

Interesting. I wonder what the VFL is then?

http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... -118-0-0-0

!

its full of those world famous suburbs

Collinsford
Carltonwood
Richthorn
footsore
Hawthorendon


known from one end of .......... errrrr .... VIC SA & WA .... to the other
thats the world isn't it



the VFL ....

Raiderdave wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

They say any exposure is good exposure but if i had kiddies and wanted them to play Victorian Rules i certainly wouldnt be taking them to see khunt play this season. He's an embarrassment for the code and a very unskillful player. The best mark i've seen him take was the uncontested one on the beach for the swiss add.

Xman he's bad news for the credibility of the code. We all know it. Thank god he's gettin a paycut soon but even that is not good enough. The gumby is taking another youngsters place just to make the competition more lopsided than it already is.

& watch him walk .... its a million plus
or off comes the singlet

why would anyone else subject themselves to Victorian Rules for a cent less when they've played far more interesting Challenging & demanding games

I hear both Izzy & Khunt will both be turning out for the Brisbane Bombers in 2015 anyway
back playing a real game

He can walk if he wishes. He won't be missed on the field. But by then his work will be done. 20-30 stories on him per year will more than pay his fee in publicity. =D>

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Interesting. I wonder what the VFL is then?

http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... -118-0-0-0

!

its full of those world famous suburbs

Collinsford
Carltonwood
Richthorn
footsore
Hawthorendon


known from one end of .......... errrrr .... VIC SA & WA .... to the other
thats the world isn't it



the VFL ....

The AFL are more a national comp than the NSWRL will ever be!

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

They say any exposure is good exposure but if i had kiddies and wanted them to play Victorian Rules i certainly wouldnt be taking them to see khunt play this season. He's an embarrassment for the code and a very unskillful player. The best mark i've seen him take was the uncontested one on the beach for the swiss add.

Xman he's bad news for the credibility of the code. We all know it. Thank god he's gettin a paycut soon but even that is not good enough. The gumby is taking another youngsters place just to make the competition more lopsided than it already is.

& watch him walk .... its a million plus
or off comes the singlet

why would anyone else subject themselves to Victorian Rules for a cent less when they've played far more interesting Challenging & demanding games

I hear both Izzy & Khunt will both be turning out for the Brisbane Bombers in 2015 anyway
back playing a real game

He can walk if he wishes. He won't be missed on the field. But by then his work will be done. 20-30 stories on him per year will more than pay his fee in publicity. =D>

the headlines

Khunt ..........."I went for the dough only .... I couldn't give a toss about their game , it is seriously boring as to play ... & a lil gay "
Izzy ....... " me too "


NSWshmen & Qlders laughing from the murray to cape york.......