Page 4 of 8

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 12:27 pm
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:
Gone are the days when Qld was a rl state.
.
8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

:-k

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

#-o

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


ahh
some of cuzzies best
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:02 pm
by NSWAFL
Raiderdave wrote:
the week before last weeks tally
good job f wit :lol: :lol: :lol:
As if we're going to believe you, Dave!

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:43 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
the week before last weeks tally
good job f wit :lol: :lol: :lol:
As if we're going to believe you, Dave!
:wink:
3 times the cred Bearsy has

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:54 pm
by cos789
NSWAFL wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
the week before last weeks tally
good job f wit :lol: :lol: :lol:
As if we're going to believe you, Dave!
Can't have any sort of debate because of all this bs.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:58 pm
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
the week before last weeks tally
good job f wit :lol: :lol: :lol:
As if we're going to believe you, Dave!
Can't have any sort of debate because of all this bs.
well then stop posting & the bs will drop by 99% :wink:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:03 pm
by cos789
Says the person with 5 points to his name.

You know, you don't have to lie all the time dave.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:26 pm
by Raiderdave
cos789 wrote:
Says the person with 5 points to his name.

.
merit points ?

wow

go me :wink:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 5:17 pm
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Xman wrote:
Your the ****. Last time the lions were top they were averaging over 30k. Even bottom, and with a second team now in the same region they are still well ahead of the all concoring storm. They put the storm to shame.
Oh and lets not forget the Lions have more members than the Broncos despite a shocker on field last season.
really :-k

ATM

Lions 13,500
Broncos 14,000

bearsy ... wrong ..again!!
...... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Xman BS file when you're ready please.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 6:37 pm
by Xman
BS file started. Off you go Raider. Back your BS up for once!

In fact he's so backed up with BS he's severely constipated!

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:16 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
BS file started. Off you go Raider. Back your BS up for once!

In fact he's so backed up with BS he's severely constipated!

whats the BS file ? :-k

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:17 pm
by Beaussie
Nevermind. I've proven my case with evidence. BS point to Raider now please Xman.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:22 pm
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
Nevermind. I've proven my case with evidence. BS point to Raider now please Xman.
well I see an out of date Broncos tally
& nothing for the Lions

ah... half truth bearsy at it again :wink:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:28 pm
by Beaussie
Out of date. FFS, it's on their website now dopey. Please do try and keep up with developments stupid.

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:57 pm
by Xman
Beaussie wrote:
Out of date. FFS, it's on their website now dopey. Please do try and keep up with developments stupid.
plus a Broncos fan posted the same number today in the Memberships thread on LU. :lol:

Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:40 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:
Out of date. FFS, it's on their website now dopey. Please do try and keep up with developments stupid.
out of date dummy :wink: