South African AR has more participants than rl.

NSWAFL · Post by **NSWAFL** » Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:42 pm

ParraEelsNRL wrote:
RFL is not Barla sara.

And forcings back is not Australian feebleball and Newcastle has never played AFL.

You did it again! They DO play AFL! And you already lost on that challenge! No repeats!

cos789 · Post by **cos789** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:54 pm

NSWAFL wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
RFL is not Barla sara.

And forcings back is not Australian feebleball and Newcastle has never played AFL.
You did it again! They DO play AFL! And you already lost on that challenge! No repeats!

Interesting point NSWAFL, parafeel should get another automatic bs point because he repeated the statement (long) after a determination has been made. I also believe there should be an additional point for contempt !
Do it NSWAFL, do it.

cos789 · Post by **cos789** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:41 pm

Why should I bother dealing with a person who has to inflate rl test figures of things.

NSWAFL · Post by **NSWAFL** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:50 pm

Two more is two too many. Suspension awaits, Debbie!

cos789 · Post by **cos789** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:33 pm

I don't know why I bother dealing with a person who has to inflate rl test figures of all things.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Bahahahahaha, someones losing it

Andit seems to be you. Because..

ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Senior teams Tom, don't South Africa have them?

Because I've already posted them - remember ?
Has all those excessess erased your memory ?

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:42 pm

NSWAFL wrote:
Two more is two too many. Suspension awaits, Debbie!

Wtf are you taking about with suspensions and shiit?

I haven't got a pm from anyone saying anything.

Dumbarse.

cos789 · Post by **cos789** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:40 pm

cos789 wrote:
I don't know why I bother dealing with a person who has to inflate rl test figures of all things.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Bahahahahaha, someones losing it
Andit seems to be you. Because..

ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Senior teams Tom, don't South Africa have them?
Because I've already posted them - remember ?
Has all those excessess erased your memory ?

I've already posted them - remember ?

NSWAFL · Post by **NSWAFL** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:45 pm

Can't you read, ignoramus?

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:18 pm

Senior teams please.

NSWAFL · Post by **NSWAFL** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:28 pm

Obviously Debbie can't read.

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:35 pm

No senior teams huh?

Just a few kiddies playing force em back?

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:36 pm

ParraEelsNRL wrote:
No senior teams huh?

Just a few kiddies playing force em back?

lol, forgot the wild part, force em back wild style.

NSWAFL · Post by **NSWAFL** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:39 pm

Go back to school and redo your comprehension class, Debbie. You need the refresher!

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:56 pm

AFL, Australian forceemback League

cos789 · Post by **cos789** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:28 am

Got anything remotely intelligent to say parafeel ?

Talking Footy

Talking Footy

South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: Does South African AR have more participants than rl.

Re: Does South African AR have more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Re: South African AR has more participants than rl.

Who is online