Talking Footy

How about you make that bet for the first game against the Swans, Parra? Better have a shirt because you'll lose it!

I not stupid, they'll be losing by 100 at least by half time and vlad will make the swans slow down.

Make a bet on that then!

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

not for long
it will drop below double in 2012 .. the first time ever .... 15 years ago it was triple

the AFL will never see their 37K average again .. the ceilings been hit .. they're done
it will stay around 30K
the NRL's will continue to make ground on it ...... by 2020 we'll be ova 20K

And we will still be well over 30K. In fact when the Adelaide Oval and the new Perth venue come online we'll fit more in! And by that time the Giants and the Swans will both have averages higher than every Sydney based RL club. It will be the Broncos and the Warriors that will keep the NRL average up to above joke levels. Just.

That's my crystal ball reply to your crystal ball effort, Dave.

throw it in the bin
its faulty

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Do we get to bet on how many games GWS will lose by 200, or will Vlad step in at half time and order the teams to "take it easy" for the good of the game?

we all know he will
they " own " both of the new sides ... they know hidings aren't good for attacting support & sponsors

he WILL instruct the other 16 teams to take it easy
but I'd doubt GWS will win a game in 2012
& the Thuns won't win any more then the 3 they won in 2011 .. & 2 of those will be against GWS

Raiderdave wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Do we get to bet on how many games GWS will lose by 200, or will Vlad step in at half time and order the teams to "take it easy" for the good of the game?

we all know he will
they " own " both of the new sides ... they know hidings aren't good for attacting support & sponsors

he WILL instruct the other 16 teams to take it easy
but I'd doubt GWS will win a game in 2012
& the Thuns won't win any more then the 3 they won in 2011 .. & 2 of those will be against GWS

Tin hats for you boys. Tin hats!

Okay, I have a bet for Dave and Parra.

Dave has said that the Suns won't win any more than 3 games. Right, when they win their fourth game of the season, you should agree to change your user name from "Raiderdave" to "Sundave" for two weeks, and have an avatar supporting the Suns for the same period. If we get to the end of the season and they haven't got past three, I'll change my username from "NSWAFL" to "NRLROCKS" for the same time period with a similar style avatar.

Parra has said that the Giants will lose at least one game by 200 points or trail at half time by 100 points. Right, if either of those things happen, I'll do the same change to my user name. If we get to the end of the season and it hasn't happened, you should agree to change your user name from "ParraEelsNRL" to "GWSGiantsAFL" for two weeks and the same avatar deal.

What do you two say?

NSWAFL wrote:

Okay, I have a bet for Dave and Parra.

Dave has said that the Suns won't win any more than 3 games. Right, when they win their fourth game of the season, you should agree to change your user name from "Raiderdave" to "Sundave" for two weeks, and have an avatar supporting the Suns for the same period. If we get to the end of the season and they haven't got past three, I'll change my username from "NSWAFL" to "NRLROCKS" for the same time period with a similar style avatar.

Parra has said that the Giants will lose at least one game by 200 points or trail at half time by 100 points. Right, if either of those things happen, I'll do the same change to my user name. If we get to the end of the season and it hasn't happened, you should agree to change your user name from "ParraEelsNRL" to "GWSGiantsAFL" for two weeks and the same avatar deal.

What do you two say?

hmmmmm
If Parras in ... I am too

We won't see Parra until later in the day if he follows his usual form but if he's got any guts left, he'll agree!

cos789 wrote:

I cannot see any explanation for the thread title.
Where is the computation for 3 times , just for starters.
How come no average season has been submitted.
Putting that heading on one round is pretty pathetic.
One for bs file IMO.

I still cannot see any explanation for the thread title.
Where is the computation for 3 times .
Give it or close it down.

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

I cannot see any explanation for the thread title.
Where is the computation for 3 times , just for starters.
How come no average season has been submitted.
Putting that heading on one round is pretty pathetic.
One for bs file IMO.

I still cannot see any explanation for the thread title.
Where is the computation for 3 times .
Give it or close it down.

Another BS point for RD. He'd be in double figures by now if this was next week!

Xman wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

I cannot see any explanation for the thread title.
Where is the computation for 3 times , just for starters.
How come no average season has been submitted.
Putting that heading on one round is pretty pathetic.
One for bs file IMO.

I still cannot see any explanation for the thread title.
Where is the computation for 3 times .
Give it or close it down.

Another BS point for RD. He'd be in double figures by now if this was next week!

Cuzzy has wracked up his 652nd
with his efforts in trying to say Toronto has more AR .. then RL has teams in WA

my my .... he's a funny fellow

Xman wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

I cannot see any explanation for the thread title.
Where is the computation for 3 times , just for starters.
How come no average season has been submitted.
Putting that heading on one round is pretty pathetic.
One for bs file IMO.

I still cannot see any explanation for the thread title.
Where is the computation for 3 times .
Give it or close it down.

Another BS point for RD. He'd be in double figures by now if this was next week!

We're still waiting.

Xman wrote:

cos789 wrote:

cos789 wrote:

I cannot see any explanation for the thread title.
Where is the computation for 3 times , just for starters.
How come no average season has been submitted.
Putting that heading on one round is pretty pathetic.
One for bs file IMO.

I still cannot see any explanation for the thread title.
Where is the computation for 3 times .
Give it or close it down.

Another BS point for RD. He'd be in double figures by now if this was next week!

Am I to take it that the BS file is going ahead? =D>

NSWAFL wrote:

Xman wrote:

cos789 wrote:

I still cannot see any explanation for the thread title.
Where is the computation for 3 times .
Give it or close it down.

Another BS point for RD. He'd be in double figures by now if this was next week!

Am I to take it that the BS file is going ahead? =D>

I would say it will. I'll wait for Beaussie to have his say but so far most of the feedback has been positive. It should liven the place right up I would have thought!