Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:55 pm
NSWAFL wrote:Yes.
Derp!
Derp!
Page 4 of 8
Derp!
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:08 pm
The author never mentioned clubs or comps and actually referred to three other codes juniors across a broad range of ages.Raiderdave wrote:NSWAFL wrote:It is not different. If a 10 year old wanted to play Under 12 competition he can.
still in a comp with an age restriction right ?
called what
thats right
U12's
what did the article say ?
thats right
U12's
kids who turn no older then 12 before Dec 31st
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:10 pm
80k kids under the age of 12? Sure I can believe it.King-Eliagh wrote:What a lazy post Xman, I have little time to be searching through and reading other threads. I think its quite simply put here and cant see why you have avoided the issue I raised. 80+ Aussie rules participants in NSW would mean that nsw will soon overtake victoria in terms of aussie rules players. Surely you cant believe this Xman?
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:11 pm
Provide a better response. Or is this another troll?ParraEelsNRL wrote:NSWAFL wrote:Yes.
Derp!
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:25 pm
Why should I went you think 82,000 under 12's play AFL in NSW.
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 8:41 pm
I know 86,000 kids under 12 play AFL in NSW.
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:22 pm
NSWAFL wrote:I know 86,000 kids under 12 play AFL in NSW.
play ?
no
they attend schools in NSW where the AFL .. conduct clinics .. & then they have no say wether or not they take part
K
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:23 pm
RubbishRaiderdave wrote:NSWAFL wrote:I know 86,000 kids under 12 play AFL in NSW.
play ?
no
they attend schools in NSW where the AFL .. conduct clinics .. & then they have no say wether or not they take part
K
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:32 pm
Interesting 30 years after the Swans arrived and the tide has even started coming in let alone be turned.
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:45 pm
What does that mean?enarelle wrote:Interesting 30 years after the Swans arrived and the tide has even started coming in let alone be turned.
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:53 pm
ah.... pretty much what it saysXman wrote:What does that mean?enarelle wrote:Interesting 30 years after the Swans arrived and the tide has even started coming in let alone be turned.
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:56 pm
The sentence doesn't even make sense!Raiderdave wrote:ah.... pretty much what it saysXman wrote:What does that mean?enarelle wrote:Interesting 30 years after the Swans arrived and the tide has even started coming in let alone be turned.
Was there an interesting 30 years? And the tide has even started coming in let alone be turned?
What language is this?
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:05 pm
hmmmm..... you may have a pointXman wrote:The sentence doesn't even make sense!Raiderdave wrote:ah.... pretty much what it saysXman wrote:What does that mean?
Was there an interesting 30 years? And the tide has even started coming in let alone be turned?
What language is this?
interesting an AFL don't belong in the same sentence
what eva could he have been talking about
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:07 pm
Even that sentence doesn't make sense!Raiderdave wrote:hmmmm..... you may have a pointXman wrote:The sentence doesn't even make sense!Raiderdave wrote:ah.... pretty much what it says
Was there an interesting 30 years? And the tide has even started coming in let alone be turned?
What language is this?
interesting an AFL don't belong in the same sentence
what eva could he have been talking about
I thought you said people from Melbourne were the dumbest in the country! You're living proof to the contrary!
Where is your proof by the way? After all you said you had lots!
Re: History Repeats
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:13 pm
oh they're utter deadshitsXman wrote:Even that sentence doesn't make sense!Raiderdave wrote:hmmmm..... you may have a pointXman wrote:The sentence doesn't even make sense!
Was there an interesting 30 years? And the tide has even started coming in let alone be turned?
What language is this?
interesting an AFL don't belong in the same sentence
what eva could he have been talking about
I thought you said people from Melbourne were the dumbest in the country! You're living proof to the contrary!
Where is your proof by the way? After all you said you had lots!
we have continual proof here ... every time you ... or NSWAFL or intestines .. or ol tipsy place their fingers on the keyboard & start typing