Talking Footy

pussycat wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:36 pm

The_Wookie wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:24 pm

pussycat wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:51 am

I have no problem Mr Twit or his site. I do have a query about some of the unsubstantiated AFL regionals that get put down to MR twit and his updates.

The only reason theres a query in the first place is because before this season we rarely had AFL regionals published unless the AFL released them. A fact never bought up the NRLs "what about our regionals" brigade is that no ones regionals were taken into account.

Your mob liked to make out/promote 5 city ratings as being representative of Australia . Many AFL viewers still think that's that is case. But that is pure fantasy. NRL viewers are entitled to mention regions considering 20-25 % of our teams are regional.

There is no problem with Mr twit. Rather the problem comes from people using his name to substantiate mysterious/bogus updates. This has made him a bit of a running joke.

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:21 am

there has been many talks in combining metro and regional as one..
don't know why such a drama

pretty stupid how Australia ad there figures.

seeing how Big Regional NSW AND QLD IS

SportFan wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:51 pm

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:21 am

there has been many talks in combining metro and regional as one..
don't know why such a drama

pretty stupid how Australia ad there figures.

seeing how Big Regional NSW AND QLD IS

The reason why that won't work, is because RegionalTAM doesn't measure key demographic data (which is what EVERY network and advertiser looks at daily) (e.g.) How many 25-54s watched a program, etc.

--

But of course AFL-haters will say that

Regional NSW & QLD is much bigger than other regional areas of Australia.

However it also doesn't mean everyone in such areas liles NRL or even sport in general.

Otherwise (for example) we'd have 24 million people watching the AFL Grand Final every year, etc.

We're a funny country when you look at (e.g.) the US.

pussycat wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2017 7:09 pm

SportFan wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:51 pm

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:21 am

there has been many talks in combining metro and regional as one..
don't know why such a drama

pretty stupid how Australia ad there figures.

seeing how Big Regional NSW AND QLD IS

The reason why that won't work, is because RegionalTAM doesn't measure key demographic data (which is what EVERY network and advertiser looks at daily) (e.g.) How many 25-54s watched a program, etc.

--

But of course AFL-haters will say that

Regional NSW & QLD is much bigger than other regional areas of Australia.

However it also doesn't mean everyone in such areas liles NRL or even sport in general.

Otherwise (for example) we'd have 24 million people watching the AFL Grand Final every year, etc.

We're a funny country when you look at (e.g.) the US.

OzTAM and Regional TAM’s in-home television audience measurement (TAM) panels estimate the time Australians across age groups spend viewing broadcast television (free-to-air and subscription channels) on in-home TV sets each month. From Q2 2017 these panels will comprise approximately 8,000 homes and 20,000 people that collectively represent the characteristics of the overall population. Estimates are projected to the population as a whole in OzTAM and Regional TAM markets: this provides per person average time spent viewing figures, including people who watch a lot of TV and those who watch relatively little or none.

The_Wookie wrote: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:38 am

and yet you lost the week. Again.

The_Wookie wrote: Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:36 pm

i believe thats what you nrl chaps refer to as a a "but but but'

SportFan wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2017 4:02 pm

With 3 prime-time AFL games again (plus other markets & multi-channels), I'd say Seven will snatch the week again.

Embarrasing for Nine.