Page 30 of 70
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:09 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:cos789 wrote:
I don't follow cricket with any great passion.
I follow Australalian Football with a passion not because it's Australian but because it's a great game..
I don't follow rl anymore, not because it's an English imperial game but because I prefer the game of Australian Football.
I don't follow RU much, not because it's an English imperial game but because I prefer the game of Australian Football.
thats you
multitudes of your **** giggleball mates try the same line about RL
but love cricket
they are a perfect example of the wombats that follow your game.

I love cricket.
I don't like RL, not because it's foreign, but because it's boring and a bogan magnet played by no neck thugs!
I love ARs and I'm very proud it is Australian made! =D>
again.. thats you.
your giggleball bum buddies try this BS line all the time
tell them to look elsewhere for reasons why NSWshmen & Qlders would bother with their silly little sport
the ... Oh your games English " sh.it
aint workin

Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:17 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
NSWAFL wrote:First Rugby World Cup was in 1954.
First International Cup was in 2002.
Yeah you might get good crowds, but we're just getting started! From acorns grow oak trees, Dave. AFL is expanding. Rugby League is sitting on it's thumbs just asking to be run over internationally! They're not in it for a giggle. They're in it to win!
Yeah I guess that's why a nation like Norway can have no RL in 2009 and at the start of 2010 have 11 senior sides?
Or in 2004, no West Indies RL, these days they have a thriving senior comp, a uni comp, juniors and are setting up a full time pro team to play in one of the United States comps next year?
Lebanon had no comp in 2002, this year they have 10 senior sides playing with juniors from under 12 up and have since moved into schools and universities, they have also taken the game to a lot of their neighbours.
I could post about another 15 nations at least that have started up in the last decade, if that's sitting on their hands doing nothing, I'd hate to see what would happen if the RLIF put a little money in to assist

Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:18 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
NSWAFL wrote:First Rugby World Cup was in 1954.
First International Cup was in 2002.
Yeah you might get good crowds, but we're just getting started! From acorns grow oak trees, Dave. AFL is expanding. Rugby League is sitting on it's thumbs just asking to be run over internationally! They're not in it for a giggle. They're in it to win!
Good crowds?
They averaged over 35,000 in 1954 in France.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:19 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
NSWAFL wrote:Raiderdave wrote:its not even close .. to being close
RL miles ahead.

Not any more, Dave! The 21st century belongs to AFL. Besides, who says it's being played professionally for 117 years? The World Cup was only formed in 1954 and it only had four countries! Where was it before that? I think we need proof that it was played professionally anywhere before 1908 when the NSWRL was formed!
Before that, it was unofficial world champs where teams would tour and the best over a period of time would be called the best just like in Test Cricket.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:20 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
NSWAFL wrote:No one was being paid to play sport in the 19th century you goose! Prove they were!
Derp, in the early days, guys made more money playing RL than soccer.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:02 pm
by cos789
ParraEelsNRL wrote:They averaged over 35,000 in 1954 in France.
Talk about living in the past.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:11 pm
by NSWAFL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:NSWAFL wrote:No one was being paid to play sport in the 19th century you goose! Prove they were!
Derp, in the early days, guys made more money playing RL than soccer.
Prove it.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:50 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Why should I, you guys never ever back anything up here, just look at this thread, all talk no action.
If you knew as much about sport as you think, you'd already know the answer.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:51 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
cos789 wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:They averaged over 35,000 in 1954 in France.
Talk about living in the past.
No one cares what you think peeping tom.
Stick to making up lies, it's what you're good at.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:54 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Why should I, you guys never ever back anything up here, just look at this thread, all talk no action.
If you knew as much about sport as you think, you'd already know the answer.
Prove it or it's deleted!
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:55 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
STFU and stop protecting your girlfriends.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:55 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:59 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:STFU and stop protecting your girlfriends.
You were asked for proof of a claim and refused.
If you doubt one of their claims ask for proof.
It's not hard to understand the rules. Even for you!
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:01 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Well I'll get it then, so keep your knickers from knotting godmod.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:02 pm
by Xman
Is this your proof?
Where is it?