Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 12:35 pm
The future looks bright for International AFL. It looks bleak for International RL. History is no longer relevant in this changing world.
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Going nowhere ? for every nation of expats to bumbling clowns that AR has gained in the last 25 years or so of attemting to export its game OSThat's the thing. The rl types like to point out their position that seems to be going nowhere.
eeerrrr .... wotPossibly that's because rl is an English game and therefore an English responsibility.
.The strength of rl internationally is that it has some countries playing above amateur status.
we have 2 even nations .. Aust & NZ .. another that can provide plenty of opposition ..in Eng & they proved this in the recent 4 nationsThe weakness of rl internationally is the uneveness of the competing countries.
the rest of this is just cuzzy's disconection with reality .. international AR is nothing more then a slap n tickle session at the parkThe IC has a rapidly increasing standard and profile with the next IC almost guarenteed being bigger and better.
ATM the strength of the IC is that there are a large number of countries within a competitive framework.
In the future there will be a lot greater distinction between the divisions but the divisions will be balanced.
Also it is a strength that Australia does not have the pretence of being a competitor but a number of countries will continue to develop strongly.
The RSA, PNG and NZ because of assistance will make continued gains to be at the forefront.
Europe, North America and the Pacific will be strong performers in the next group.
2011 newcomers like China and India should be improvers.
Then there should be a few newcomers to the next IC.
All in all a very balanced competition that in all probability will continue to develope in all aspects
yes .. they may actually get some of those jungle jims off their venuesTopper wrote:The future looks bright for International AFL. It looks bleak for International RL. History is no longer relevant in this changing world.
It does look bright, especially those countries that have been the recipients of assistance - the RSA, PNG and NZ.Topper wrote:The future looks bright for International AFL.
I cannot really comment on that because you hear so little about international rl.Topper wrote:It looks bleak for International RL.
And never really was.Topper wrote:History is no longer relevant in this changing world.
That's the problem. Where's the expansion? RL should be flogging itself to as many countries as possible. But not a bleep!cos789 wrote:I cannot really comment on that because you hear so little about international rl.
same could be said for ARTopper wrote:That's the problem. Where's the expansion? RL should be flogging itself to as many countries as possible. But not a bleep!cos789 wrote:I cannot really comment on that because you hear so little about international rl.
Since it's not an Australian game what's to worry about.Topper wrote:That's the problem. Where's the expansion? RL should be flogging itself to as many countries as possible. But not a bleep!cos789 wrote:I cannot really comment on that because you hear so little about international rl.
cos789 wrote:Since it's not an Australian game what's to worry about.Topper wrote:That's the problem. Where's the expansion? RL should be flogging itself to as many countries as possible. But not a bleep!cos789 wrote:I cannot really comment on that because you hear so little about international rl.
It's an imperial English game living in the shadow of it's mother RU.
Irish Football has a lot more global potential than rl and you don't hear about that at all.
The beauty about Australian Football is just that, it's Australian, it's a tourist attraction domestically and is increasingly linked to Australian trade envoys overseas.
I hate Imperial English SportsNSWAFL wrote:No one's "retarted", Dave! But you're ******** if you think mentioning cricket is even relevant!
I don't follow cricket with any great passion.NSWAFL wrote:No one's "retarted", Dave! But you're ******** if you think mentioning cricket is even relevant!
cos789 wrote:I don't follow cricket with any great passion.NSWAFL wrote:No one's "retarted", Dave! But you're ******** if you think mentioning cricket is even relevant!
I follow Australalian Football with a passion not because it's Australian but because it's a great game..
I don't follow rl anymore, not because it's an English imperial game but because I prefer the game of Australian Football.
I don't follow RU much, not because it's an English imperial game but because I prefer the game of Australian Football.
I love cricket.Raiderdave wrote:cos789 wrote:I don't follow cricket with any great passion.NSWAFL wrote:No one's "retarted", Dave! But you're ******** if you think mentioning cricket is even relevant!
I follow Australalian Football with a passion not because it's Australian but because it's a great game..
I don't follow rl anymore, not because it's an English imperial game but because I prefer the game of Australian Football.
I don't follow RU much, not because it's an English imperial game but because I prefer the game of Australian Football.
thats you
multitudes of your **** giggleball mates try the same line about RL
but love cricket
they are a perfect example of the wombats that follow your game.