Page 28 of 185
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:07 pm
by Beaussie
pussycat wrote:Truthsayer wrote:What does Iron Chef have to do with the expansion of the codes?
Expansion, and successful expansion are two completely different things. It's intersting you think your game is national. Your presence in NSW is nothing more than a dot on a map.
Almost 30 years on and the Swans regulary get beaten by SBS reruns in the ratings. And Queenslands not a whole lot better for you brainwashed mushrooms. Rugby Union is more of a national competition than your code.
Sounds to me like Demetriou suffers from penis envy.
You're pathetic. Never let the facts get in the ways of a dumbarse throwball fan.
They think if they repeat something over and over again it will become reality in other peoples minds. The facts are there for all to see dumbarse.
Saturday Night AFL Ten 528,000
79,000 265,000 24,000 104,000 56,000
Iron Chef Rpt SBS ONE 121,000
32,000 39,000 24,000 7,000 18,000
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/08/week-32-4.html
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:02 pm
by pussycat
Beaussie wrote:pussycat wrote:Truthsayer wrote:What does Iron Chef have to do with the expansion of the codes?
Expansion, and successful expansion are two completely different things. It's intersting you think your game is national. Your presence in NSW is nothing more than a dot on a map.
Almost 30 years on and the Swans regulary get beaten by SBS reruns in the ratings. And Queenslands not a whole lot better for you brainwashed mushrooms. Rugby Union is more of a national competition than your code.
Sounds to me like Demetriou suffers from penis envy.
You're pathetic. Never let the facts get in the ways of a dumbarse throwball fan.
They think if they repeat something over and over again it will become reality in other peoples minds. The facts are there for all to see dumbarse.
Saturday Night AFL Ten 528,000
79,000 265,000 24,000 104,000 56,000
Iron Chef Rpt SBS ONE 121,000
32,000 39,000 24,000 7,000 18,000
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/08/week-32-4.html
I didn't say every week - That would be emarassing - very embarassing. But the're not known as the Swans nemesis for no reason. and, as far as I know, there not in debt upto there neck either.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:13 pm
by Beaussie
Give it up pussycat. We all know what you were trying to suggest. You're pathetic. A liar as well. The facts don't lie and you look really stupid now.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:43 am
by pussycat
Beaussie wrote:Give it up pussycat. We all know what you were trying to suggest. You're pathetic. A liar as well. The facts don't lie and you look really stupid now.
If it appears it in the paper on numerous occassions, something you would be well aware of, than who's the liar? Or are you just closing your eyes and sticking your head in the sand? like all the other braindead mushrooms.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:53 am
by Raiderdave
pussycat wrote:Beaussie wrote:Give it up pussycat. We all know what you were trying to suggest. You're pathetic. A liar as well. The facts don't lie and you look really stupid now.
If it appears it in the paper on numerous occassions, something you would be well aware of, than who's the liar?
Or are you just closing your eyes and sticking your head in the sand? like all the other braindead mushrooms.
or somewhere else
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:23 am
by Truthsayer
pussycat wrote:Beaussie wrote:Give it up pussycat. We all know what you were trying to suggest. You're pathetic. A liar as well. The facts don't lie and you look really stupid now.
If it appears it in the paper on numerous occassions, something you would be well aware of, than who's the liar? Or are you just closing your eyes and sticking your head in the sand? like all the other braindead mushrooms.
Perhaps if you were to show us every weekly rating from the beginning of the 2011 season we would be able to gauge as to who is telling the truth.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:46 pm
by pussycat
Truthsayer wrote:Perhaps if you were to show us every weekly rating from the beginning of the 2011 season we would be able to gauge as to who is telling the truth.
Iv'e already posted it from many different sites on many different dates so try learning to read!
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:03 pm
by Truthsayer
Kindly do not be rude, Mr Pussycat. The easiest solution is to do as I have asked. It is a perfectly reasonable request.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:43 pm
by pussycat
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:10 pm
by Beaussie
Oh dear, links that are over 5 years old. Fair dinkum. Like I said before pussycat.... you're pathetic.
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:37 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:Oh dear, links that are over 5 years old. Fair dinkum. Like I said before pussycat.... you're pathetic.
the suggestion was it has
never happened
it quite obviously ... has
& really .. has anything improved in the last 5 years
no.. its got worse
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:46 am
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:Oh dear, links that are over 5 years old. Fair dinkum. Like I said before pussycat.... you're pathetic.
the suggestion was it has
never happened
it quite obviously ... has
& really .. has anything improved in the last 5 years
no.. its got worse
And you and pussycat were trying to suggest it happens every week of every season. As I have shown, what you and him say is utter rubbish once the facts are posted and from that obviously the ratings have improved.
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:58 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:Oh dear, links that are over 5 years old. Fair dinkum. Like I said before pussycat.... you're pathetic.
the suggestion was it has
never happened
it quite obviously ... has
& really .. has anything improved in the last 5 years
no.. its got worse
And you and pussycat were trying to suggest it happens every week of every season. As I have shown, what you and him say is utter rubbish once the facts are posted and from that obviously the ratings have improved.
the fact in question was if the Swans have been outrated by Iron Chef
the inference from yourself was it hadn't
not that it didn't happen often
you were incorrect ..... again
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:24 am
by Truthsayer
Beaussie wrote:Oh dear, links that are over 5 years old. Fair dinkum. Like I said before pussycat.... you're pathetic.
Mr Pussycat has also failed to provide for the request. We both know that he imputed that for
most weeks Iron Chef was rating better than the AFL in Sydney. A complete list of the ratings by week would answer this query once and for all, instead of some biased editorial commentary. And yet Mr Pussycat avoids the hard work. I wonder who that would remind us of.
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:58 am
by pussycat
