The No.1 Football Code in Australia

Post by **Beaussie** » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:07 pm

pussycat wrote:
Truthsayer wrote:
What does Iron Chef have to do with the expansion of the codes?
Expansion, and successful expansion are two completely different things. It's intersting you think your game is national. Your presence in NSW is nothing more than a dot on a map. Almost 30 years on and the Swans regulary get beaten by SBS reruns in the ratings. And Queenslands not a whole lot better for you brainwashed mushrooms. Rugby Union is more of a national competition than your code.

Sounds to me like Demetriou suffers from penis envy.

You're pathetic. Never let the facts get in the ways of a dumbarse throwball fan.

They think if they repeat something over and over again it will become reality in other peoples minds. The facts are there for all to see dumbarse.

Saturday Night AFL Ten 528,000 79,000 265,000 24,000 104,000 56,000

Iron Chef Rpt SBS ONE 121,000 32,000 39,000 24,000 7,000 18,000

http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/08/week-32-4.html

pussycat · Post by **pussycat** » Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:02 pm

Beaussie wrote:
pussycat wrote:
Truthsayer wrote:
What does Iron Chef have to do with the expansion of the codes?
Expansion, and successful expansion are two completely different things. It's intersting you think your game is national. Your presence in NSW is nothing more than a dot on a map. Almost 30 years on and the Swans regulary get beaten by SBS reruns in the ratings. And Queenslands not a whole lot better for you brainwashed mushrooms. Rugby Union is more of a national competition than your code.

Sounds to me like Demetriou suffers from penis envy.
You're pathetic. Never let the facts get in the ways of a dumbarse throwball fan.

They think if they repeat something over and over again it will become reality in other peoples minds. The facts are there for all to see dumbarse.

Saturday Night AFL Ten 528,000 79,000 265,000 24,000 104,000 56,000

Iron Chef Rpt SBS ONE 121,000 32,000 39,000 24,000 7,000 18,000

http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2011/08/week-32-4.html

I didn't say every week - That would be emarassing - very embarassing. But the're not known as the Swans nemesis for no reason. and, as far as I know, there not in debt upto there neck either.

Post by **Beaussie** » Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:13 pm

Give it up pussycat. We all know what you were trying to suggest. You're pathetic. A liar as well. The facts don't lie and you look really stupid now.

pussycat · Post by **pussycat** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:43 am

Beaussie wrote:
Give it up pussycat. We all know what you were trying to suggest. You're pathetic. A liar as well. The facts don't lie and you look really stupid now.

If it appears it in the paper on numerous occassions, something you would be well aware of, than who's the liar? Or are you just closing your eyes and sticking your head in the sand? like all the other braindead mushrooms.

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:53 am

pussycat wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Give it up pussycat. We all know what you were trying to suggest. You're pathetic. A liar as well. The facts don't lie and you look really stupid now.
If it appears it in the paper on numerous occassions, something you would be well aware of, than who's the liar? Or are you just closing your eyes and sticking your head in the sand? like all the other braindead mushrooms.

or somewhere else

Truthsayer · Post by **Truthsayer** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:23 am

pussycat wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Give it up pussycat. We all know what you were trying to suggest. You're pathetic. A liar as well. The facts don't lie and you look really stupid now.
If it appears it in the paper on numerous occassions, something you would be well aware of, than who's the liar? Or are you just closing your eyes and sticking your head in the sand? like all the other braindead mushrooms.

Perhaps if you were to show us every weekly rating from the beginning of the 2011 season we would be able to gauge as to who is telling the truth.

pussycat · Post by **pussycat** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:46 pm

Truthsayer wrote:
Perhaps if you were to show us every weekly rating from the beginning of the 2011 season we would be able to gauge as to who is telling the truth.

Iv'e already posted it from many different sites on many different dates so try learning to read!

Truthsayer · Post by **Truthsayer** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:03 pm

Kindly do not be rude, Mr Pussycat. The easiest solution is to do as I have asked. It is a perfectly reasonable request.

pussycat · Post by **pussycat** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:43 pm

http://www.smh.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/iron ... -shkr.html

http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/the ... elevision/

http://www.smh.com.au/news/AFL/Sydney-o ... 60918.html

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/archive/i ... 79360.html

http://www.theage.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/i ... =text-only

http://www.theroar.com.au/2011/06/18/ti ... melbourne/

http://sfcu.com.au/smf111/index.php?top ... 7.300;wap2

http://www.smh.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/ten- ... -shoi.html

Post by **Beaussie** » Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:10 pm

Oh dear, links that are over 5 years old. Fair dinkum. Like I said before pussycat.... you're pathetic.

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:37 am

Beaussie wrote:
Oh dear, links that are over 5 years old. Fair dinkum. Like I said before pussycat.... you're pathetic.

the suggestion was it has never happened

it quite obviously ... has
& really .. has anything improved in the last 5 years
no.. its got worse

Post by **Beaussie** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:46 am

Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Oh dear, links that are over 5 years old. Fair dinkum. Like I said before pussycat.... you're pathetic.
the suggestion was it has never happened

it quite obviously ... has
& really .. has anything improved in the last 5 years
no.. its got worse

And you and pussycat were trying to suggest it happens every week of every season. As I have shown, what you and him say is utter rubbish once the facts are posted and from that obviously the ratings have improved.

Raiderdave · Post by **Raiderdave** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:58 am

Beaussie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Beaussie wrote:
Oh dear, links that are over 5 years old. Fair dinkum. Like I said before pussycat.... you're pathetic.
the suggestion was it has never happened

it quite obviously ... has
& really .. has anything improved in the last 5 years
no.. its got worse
And you and pussycat were trying to suggest it happens every week of every season. As I have shown, what you and him say is utter rubbish once the facts are posted and from that obviously the ratings have improved.

the fact in question was if the Swans have been outrated by Iron Chef

the inference from yourself was it hadn't
not that it didn't happen often

you were incorrect ..... again

Truthsayer · Post by **Truthsayer** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:24 am

Beaussie wrote:
Oh dear, links that are over 5 years old. Fair dinkum. Like I said before pussycat.... you're pathetic.

Mr Pussycat has also failed to provide for the request. We both know that he imputed that for most weeks Iron Chef was rating better than the AFL in Sydney. A complete list of the ratings by week would answer this query once and for all, instead of some biased editorial commentary. And yet Mr Pussycat avoids the hard work. I wonder who that would remind us of.

pussycat · Post by **pussycat** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:58 am

Beaussie wrote:
Oh dear, links that are over 5 years old. Fair dinkum. Like I said before pussycat.... you're pathetic.

They range from 2005 to 2011! :D

The first first article is from 2011 and mention's so far its 2-0 to SBS

Meaning that the Swans fan base in Sydney is only slightly below that of people who like to watch repeats of a Japaneese cooking show on SBS

AFL mushroom: We've got a national competition.
Someone with a double digit IQ:

Talking Footy

Talking Footy

The No.1 Football Code in Australia

What is the No.1 Football Code in Australia?