Talking Footy

Swans4ever wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Yeah it will just like the Swans 30 yrs on 35k members(more than any RL club) bigger crowds than RL - its going to be great - but you stick to the suburban RL comp called the NRL - 1 team melb 1 team NZ the rest in NSW and QLD. Its a joke national my arse! By the way Raiderdave heard the Raiders have got a lot of debt had to get a bail out from the social club - crowds are down and people are complaining that unless your an islander you WONT get into the NRL! Should rename it the Sydney islander rugby league comp or the SIRL - because you are a sirly lot!

Rugby League has a whole other professional competition in the UK too though. Even teams in France. Something AFL fails at miserably.

http://www.superleague.co.uk

As a sport, the word Aussie Rules suits AFL perfectly. It is all it will ever be. A little single nation sport that can't grow overseas lol..

And how does that make the NRL 'NATIONAL' in Australia - your an idiot!

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Yeah it will just like the Swans 30 yrs on 35k members(more than any RL club) bigger crowds than RL - its going to be great - but you stick to the suburban RL comp called the NRL - 1 team melb 1 team NZ the rest in NSW and QLD. Its a joke national my arse! By the way Raiderdave heard the Raiders have got a lot of debt had to get a bail out from the social club - crowds are down and people are complaining that unless your an islander you WONT get into the NRL! Should rename it the Sydney islander rugby league comp or the SIRL - because you are a sirly lot!

Rugby League has a whole other professional competition in the UK too though. Even teams in France. Something AFL fails at miserably.

http://www.superleague.co.uk

As a sport, the word Aussie Rules suits AFL perfectly. It is all it will ever be. A little single nation sport that can't grow overseas lol..

And how does that make the NRL 'NATIONAL' in Australia - your an idiot!

Well they do play Euro teams at the end of the year. Ever heard of world club challenge? Where the best in the NRL play the best in Superleague.

So really Rugby leagues comp still has a far greater reach the anything AFL has.

The winner of the World club Challenge is the best Rugby League team out of 28 clubs.
That is 10 more than AFL has hey.

post_hoc wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Yeah it will just like the Swans 30 yrs on 35k members(more than any RL club) bigger crowds than RL - its going to be great - but you stick to the suburban RL comp called the NRL - 1 team melb 1 team NZ the rest in NSW and QLD. Its a joke national my arse! By the way Raiderdave heard the Raiders have got a lot of debt had to get a bail out from the social club - crowds are down and people are complaining that unless your an islander you WONT get into the NRL! Should rename it the Sydney islander rugby league comp or the SIRL - because you are a sirly lot!

Rugby League has a whole other professional competition in the UK too though. Even teams in France. Something AFL fails at miserably.

http://www.superleague.co.uk

As a sport, the word Aussie Rules suits AFL perfectly. It is all it will ever be. A little single nation sport that can't grow overseas lol..

And how does that make the NRL 'NATIONAL' in Australia - your an idiot!

Well they do play Euro teams at the end of the year. Ever heard of world club challenge? Where the best in the NRL play the best in Superleague.

So really Rugby leagues comp still has a far greater reach the anything AFL has.

The winner of the World club Challenge is the best Rugby League team out of 28 clubs.
That is 10 more than AFL has hey.

Interesting way to look at it, along the same lines as Champions League Football, which for Australia is the Asian Champions League, which have 45 teams compete, but are chosen from 100's of teams.

Swans4ever wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Yeah it will just like the Swans 30 yrs on 35k members(more than any RL club) bigger crowds than RL - its going to be great - but you stick to the suburban RL comp called the NRL - 1 team melb 1 team NZ the rest in NSW and QLD. Its a joke national my arse! By the way Raiderdave heard the Raiders have got a lot of debt had to get a bail out from the social club - crowds are down and people are complaining that unless your an islander you WONT get into the NRL! Should rename it the Sydney islander rugby league comp or the SIRL - because you are a sirly lot!

Rugby League has a whole other professional competition in the UK too though. Even teams in France. Something AFL fails at miserably.

http://www.superleague.co.uk

As a sport, the word Aussie Rules suits AFL perfectly. It is all it will ever be. A little single nation sport that can't grow overseas lol..

And how does that make the NRL 'NATIONAL' in Australia - your an idiot!

Well they do play Euro teams at the end of the year. Ever heard of world club challenge? Where the best in the NRL play the best in Superleague.

So really Rugby leagues comp still has a far greater reach the anything AFL has.

The winner of the World club Challenge is the best Rugby League team out of 28 clubs.
That is 10 more than AFL has hey.

Interesting way to look at it, along the same lines as Champions League Football, which for Australia is the Asian Champions League, which have 45 teams compete, but are chosen from 100's of teams.

Yawn........haven't you said this before??? Aren't feelin a little inadequate are we??

Swans4ever wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Yeah it will just like the Swans 30 yrs on 35k members(more than any RL club) bigger crowds than RL - its going to be great - but you stick to the suburban RL comp called the NRL - 1 team melb 1 team NZ the rest in NSW and QLD. Its a joke national my arse! By the way Raiderdave heard the Raiders have got a lot of debt had to get a bail out from the social club - crowds are down and people are complaining that unless your an islander you WONT get into the NRL! Should rename it the Sydney islander rugby league comp or the SIRL - because you are a sirly lot!

Rugby League has a whole other professional competition in the UK too though. Even teams in France. Something AFL fails at miserably.

http://www.superleague.co.uk

As a sport, the word Aussie Rules suits AFL perfectly. It is all it will ever be. A little single nation sport that can't grow overseas lol..

And how does that make the NRL 'NATIONAL' in Australia - your an idiot!

Well they do play Euro teams at the end of the year. Ever heard of world club challenge? Where the best in the NRL play the best in Superleague.

So really Rugby leagues comp still has a far greater reach the anything AFL has.

The winner of the World club Challenge is the best Rugby League team out of 28 clubs.
That is 10 more than AFL has hey.

Interesting way to look at it, along the same lines as Champions League Football, which for Australia is the Asian Champions League, which have 45 teams compete, but are chosen from 100's of teams.

Yawn........haven't you said this before??? Aren't feelin a little inadequate are we??

post_hoc wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Yeah it will just like the Swans 30 yrs on 35k members(more than any RL club) bigger crowds than RL - its going to be great - but you stick to the suburban RL comp called the NRL - 1 team melb 1 team NZ the rest in NSW and QLD. Its a joke national my arse! By the way Raiderdave heard the Raiders have got a lot of debt had to get a bail out from the social club - crowds are down and people are complaining that unless your an islander you WONT get into the NRL! Should rename it the Sydney islander rugby league comp or the SIRL - because you are a sirly lot!

Rugby League has a whole other professional competition in the UK too though. Even teams in France. Something AFL fails at miserably.

http://www.superleague.co.uk

As a sport, the word Aussie Rules suits AFL perfectly. It is all it will ever be. A little single nation sport that can't grow overseas lol..

And how does that make the NRL 'NATIONAL' in Australia - your an idiot!

Well they do play Euro teams at the end of the year. Ever heard of world club challenge? Where the best in the NRL play the best in Superleague.

So really Rugby leagues comp still has a far greater reach the anything AFL has.

The winner of the World club Challenge is the best Rugby League team out of 28 clubs.
That is 10 more than AFL has hey.

Interesting way to look at it, along the same lines as Champions League Football, which for Australia is the Asian Champions League, which have 45 teams compete, but are chosen from 100's of teams.

Yawn........haven't you said this before??? Aren't feelin a little inadequate are we??

Was that reply to me, or NRL&NFL?

Thresher wrote:

our players do not need to avoid drug tests

Swans4ever wrote:

Thresher wrote:

our players do not need to avoid drug tests

What drugs are you on thrusher????

eelofwest wrote: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:31 am

King-Eliagh wrote:

I think the wanderers are a fairly serious threat to the AFL's expansion program in Western Syd. RL is already established and self sustainable in this heartland. With the influx of immiigrants in the area soccer, the world sport, is bound to have a large supporter base. Tough going for the AFL. I still think their move to place the team in the inner west rather than in GWS was a very dumb move by the AFL. OR perhaps it was the naming of the team...? They could be called the 'inner western sydney giants' atleast then they'd round up a few of the chardonnay sippers of Sydneys inner west but now they're really in no mans land arent they?

Yeah the FFA cought onto this King, and knew they needed a team in the West of sydney Asap.

The wanderers are yet another knife in the back of GWS.
Now they have to remove 2 knifes, one from the Wanderers and the other from the Swans winning the flag.... Big ask imo.

That is the thing people on this site do not seam to understand........RL and Soccer are two completely different sports that have co existed in western sydney since forever, RL and many of its fans actually will follow the wanderers, i have several mates that are eels fans going to these games.

The AFL and FFA are in direct competition in western sydney, RL has its place and will always coexist with Soccer.

Sydney Thunder had 11,000 in a rain interupted match.

Fair to say the Wanderers have dropped to 3rd behind the Thunder and GWS Giants now?

https://forum.insidesport.com.au/Dialog ... ID=2738312

King-Eliagh wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 7:49 pm

Gws vs Gold Coast, 2018 - round 12 at Sydney showground ...wait for it ...

.... a whopping .... drum roll please ....


7131 attendees



Beaussie, last time I checked 7131 < 7238

Facts are the Wanderers are already much more popular than gdubbya I was right two years ago and I’m right now