Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Xman wrote:

@MediaweekAUS: Sat STV #AFL #AFLCatsBlues 215k #AFLGiantsSaints 178k #AFLNorthSwans 142k #AFLDeesEagles 138k #AFLSunsLions 73k #FoxFooty #FoxSports

280k for the arvo, 288k for the evening, plus FTA

ten teams (5 matches) made up yesterdays ' arvo' and 'night' match. I not sure of the exact make but one thing I am sure of is it was an embarrassed - major


Our 3 PTV matches - one on 2 hours delay. Get similar rating to your 5 PTV matches ... But whats new =D> =D> =D>


C'mon xman, even you must be able to see the funny side of it

So your 3 games were all shown in isolation with 2 in prime time, and ours were shown in essentially 3 sessions and against free to air, with 2 in the afternoon.

The fact remains the AFL had a total of 1.1m in the evening and 880k for the afternoon for a total of around 2m.

The NRL had a total of 692k for the entire day.

OMG do people see the argument Xman is putting across.....................

Xman its okay our concurrent ratings piss on the AFL from a great height.....there there little one............

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

pussycat wrote:

ten teams (5 matches) made up yesterdays ' arvo' and 'night' match. I not sure of the exact make but one thing I am sure of is it was an embarrassed - major


Our 3 PTV matches - one on 2 hours delay. Get similar rating to your 5 PTV matches ... But whats new =D> =D> =D>


C'mon xman, even you must be able to see the funny side of it

So your 3 games were all shown in isolation with 2 in prime time, and ours were shown in essentially 3 sessions and against free to air, with 2 in the afternoon.

The fact remains the AFL had a total of 1.1m in the evening and 880k for the afternoon for a total of around 2m.

The NRL had a total of 692k for the entire day.

OMG do people see the argument Xman is putting across.....................

Xman its okay our concurrent ratings piss on the AFL from a great height.....there there little one............

really....do tell

73K for the Queef Clash on pay tv nationally ?

is that a misprint ?

it isn't



OMG ......

Raiderdave wrote:

73K for the Queef Clash on pay tv nationally ?

is that a misprint ?

it isn't



OMG ......

two expansion teams up against another AFL match. Funny how the raiders got barely more when shown in isolation

The Raiders match was shown at the same time as the Souths-Melb match , which almost got 400k - 500 with the NZ audience. The raiders v Warriors (with its entire audience shown) would of cracked 200k.! So that concurrent Bullshit you rave on about is very tiresome and boring . A poor excuse to try and hide the shortcomings of your pathetic game

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

pussycat wrote:

ten teams (5 matches) made up yesterdays ' arvo' and 'night' match. I not sure of the exact make but one thing I am sure of is it was an embarrassed - major


Our 3 PTV matches - one on 2 hours delay. Get similar rating to your 5 PTV matches ... But whats new =D> =D> =D>


C'mon xman, even you must be able to see the funny side of it

So your 3 games were all shown in isolation with 2 in prime time, and ours were shown in essentially 3 sessions and against free to air, with 2 in the afternoon.

The fact remains the AFL had a total of 1.1m in the evening and 880k for the afternoon for a total of around 2m.

The NRL had a total of 692k for the entire day.

OMG do people see the argument Xman is putting across.....................

Xman its okay our concurrent ratings piss on the AFL from a great height.....there there little one............

No they dont. Our rating piss on yours. At least get that right.

pussycat wrote:

The Raiders match was shown at the same time as the Souths-Melb match , which almost got 400k - 500 with the NZ audience. The raiders v Warriors (with its entire audience shown) would of cracked 200k.! So that concurrent Bullshit you rave on about is very tiresome and boring . A poor excuse to try and hide the shortcomings of your pathetic game

So the q clash gets bigger ratings PTV and 7mate in queensland to the raiders match and your attacking it. it was under similar conditions ( up against a much better match) and you spout that crap. Btw why would the south melbourne game have got big NZ ratings when the NZ audience were all watching the warriors game which was on at the same time?

Wow, the Giants smashed the Raiders in the ratings as well as the crowd on Saturday.

Stewie wrote:

Wow, the Giants smashed the Raiders in the ratings as well as the crowd on Saturday.

Yeah, the only difference being the raiders were shown on a two our delay, and only have the fan base was counnted. Your looking at 200 For that match with the NZ numbers put in, 500 for the Souths match and another 200 for the Knights.....900k for just 3 matches.

Now lets look at the AFL- Cats 215k, Giants 180K, Nth Melb 140k, Melb 140k,Suns 70K.... giving us a total of nearly 750K for there 5 matches.


Wow

piesman2011 wrote:

pussycat wrote:

The Raiders match was shown at the same time as the Souths-Melb match , which almost got 400k - 500 with the NZ audience. The raiders v Warriors (with its entire audience shown) would of cracked 200k.! So that concurrent Bullshit you rave on about is very tiresome and boring . A poor excuse to try and hide the shortcomings of your pathetic game

So the q clash gets bigger ratings PTV and 7mate in queensland to the raiders match and your attacking it. it was under similar conditions ( up against a much better match) and you spout that crap. Btw why would the south melbourne game have got

I was simply pointed out to Stewie a few home truths. I wasn't attacking anyone. I don't need to - people have eyes.



The Souths game may not of got 100 k but it would have got very close to it.

Mediaweek‏@MediaweekAUS2h
Sun TV #AFL Seven 632k (Mel 353k Ade 199k Per 80k) 7mate 107k (Syd 27k Bri 42k Ade 38k)
Mediaweek‏@MediaweekAUS2h
Sun STV #AFL #AFLPiesHawks 235k #AFLPowerCrows 169k #AFLTigersDogs 159k #FoxSports #FoxFooty


Mediaweek‏@MediaweekAUS2h
Sun TV #NRL #NRLWSTSGI Nine 370k (Syd 241k Bri 129k) GEM 23k (Mel 16k - Ade less than 1k - Per 7k)

Sun STV #NRL #NRLGLDPAR 204k #NRLMANCRO 194k #FoxSports

Good ratings for the AFL

Collingwood vs Hawks got 353K mel 38K adel 80K perth 27K Syd 42K bris 235K PTV total 775K

Adelaide vs Port 199 Adel 169 PTV = 368K

Collingwood vs Hawks would have gone close to breaking 1 million on sunday. For that time slot probabaly 1.8 million were watching nationally.

Total AFL ratings for round 3 was 4,167,000 viewers metro and PTV this week which is one of the better rounds from memory that has had overlapping games.

Without the numbers from the Port Adelaide game added the pies match would'nt of gotten anymore than 800 metro.& PTV

piesman2011 wrote:

Mediaweek‏@MediaweekAUS2h
Sun TV #AFL Seven 632k (Mel 353k Ade 199k Per 80k) 7mate 107k (Syd 27k Bri 42k Ade 38k)
Mediaweek‏@MediaweekAUS2h
Sun STV #AFL #AFLPiesHawks 235k #AFLPowerCrows 169k #AFLTigersDogs 159k #FoxSports #FoxFooty

Mediaweek‏@MediaweekAUS2h
Sun TV #NRL #NRLWSTSGI Nine 370k (Syd 241k Bri 129k) GEM 23k (Mel 16k - Ade less than 1k - Per 7k)

Sun STV #NRL #NRLGLDPAR 204k #NRLMANCRO 194k #FoxSports

Good ratings for the AFL

Collingwood vs Hawks got 353K mel 38K adel 80K perth 27K Syd 42K bris 235K PTV total 775K

Adelaide vs Port 199 Adel 169 PTV = 368K

So the AFL had 2 games playing late yesterday afternoon, Pies v Hawks and Power v Crows. 632k ch7, 107k 7 mate, 246 regionals, and 235k plus 169k on PTV = 1.389m for a Sunday afternoon =D> =D>

Add 159k for the tigers v dogs game on paytv.

So the AFL got a total for Sunday of 1.548m from 3 matches, with 2 shown concurrently.


The NRL got 393k Ch9 and gem, plus 262k regionals for a total of 655k for their game at 4pm. That's less than half the AFL coverage at the same time. They also had 204k and 194k on PTV for the day.

So the NRL got a total for Sunday of 1.053m from 3 matches, all shown in isolation.