Page 27 of 185
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:31 pm
by pussycat
I suggest nothing 'Tanking is part of your game' - That is a fact!
Representive football is part of rugby league - That is also a fact!
Only a fool argues with facts - that is also a fact!
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:08 pm
by Raiderdave
Onions wrote:108K is your all time record, right? Too ******* bad, Raider Boy! Ours is 121K!! Beat THAT!! Oh yeah that's right, your stupid NRL doesn't have the ******* guts to try and match it because they know they ******* CAN'T!!
you lot turn up to watch teams Tank
a crowd of 121K loses all " wow " factor with this sad pathetic revelation
you lot are so devoid of lives
what the hell else do you have to do
sad sad gumbies the lot of you.
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 4:23 pm
by Truthsayer
pussycat wrote:I suggest nothing 'Tanking is part of your game' - That is a fact!
Representive football is part of rugby league - That is also a fact!
Only a fool argues with facts - that is also a fact!
You have just argued with facts. Therefore you are a fool. Tanking is not a part of our game because it has only been confirmed as committed by one club The remainder is merely speculation and therefore not fact.
Representative football is not a part of rugby league because it is not played weekly. The game is a weekly contest and representative football is not weekly.
The intelligence level of this debate is dropping rather alarmingly to the point that I wonder now if there is any future in debating anything with you people.
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 5:14 pm
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:Onions wrote:We have a multi dimensional game that your ******* game can only dream of being, kid! Kicking, handpassing, tackling, shepherding (illegal in your ******* stupid game!), higher scoring and super fast and tough!
We don't need origin, tests, city country or **** like that! You ******* do and that's a ******* joke!
your code will NEVER sucessfully expand outside of Sthn Australia
because it only has its boring
predictable
club comp
that is all

Um, hate to break it to you sunshine, but we have already demonstrated proven success with expansion in NSW and QLD. So much so that 2 extra teams have been added in each market. How's your expansion plans going?

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 7:33 pm
by pussycat
Beaussie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Onions wrote:We have a multi dimensional game that your ******* game can only dream of being, kid! Kicking, handpassing, tackling, shepherding (illegal in your ******* stupid game!), higher scoring and super fast and tough!
We don't need origin, tests, city country or **** like that! You ******* do and that's a ******* joke!
your code will NEVER sucessfully expand outside of Sthn Australia
because it only has its boring
predictable
club comp
that is all

Um, hate to break it to you sunshine, but we have
already demonstrated proven success with expansion in NSW and QLD. So much so that 2 extra teams have been added in each market. How's your expansion plans going?

? Success

I think the Iron Chef might have something to say about that
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:40 pm
by Truthsayer
What does Iron Chef have to do with the expansion of the codes?
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 11:49 pm
by pussycat
Truthsayer wrote:What does Iron Chef have to do with the expansion of the codes?
Expansion, and successful expansion are two completely different things. It's intersting you think your game is national. Your presence in NSW is nothing more than a dot on a map. Almost 30 years on and the Swans regulary get beaten by SBS reruns in the ratings. And Queenslands not a whole lot better for you brainwashed mushrooms. Rugby Union is more of a national competition than your code.
Sounds to me like Demetriou suffers from penis envy.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:25 am
by Raiderdave
Truthsayer wrote:pussycat wrote:I suggest nothing 'Tanking is part of your game' - That is a fact!
Representive football is part of rugby league - That is also a fact!
Only a fool argues with facts - that is also a fact!
You have just argued with facts. Therefore you are a fool. Tanking is not a part of our game because it has only been confirmed as committed by one club The remainder is merely speculation and therefore not fact.
Representative football is not a part of rugby league because it is not played weekly. The game is a weekly contest and representative football is not weekly.
The intelligence level of this debate is dropping rather alarmingly to the point that I wonder now if there is any future in debating anything with you people.
delusional much
it occurs widely ... what a disgrace
what a sham of a comp

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:32 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Onions wrote:We have a multi dimensional game that your ******* game can only dream of being, kid! Kicking, handpassing, tackling, shepherding (illegal in your ******* stupid game!), higher scoring and super fast and tough!
We don't need origin, tests, city country or **** like that! You ******* do and that's a ******* joke!
your code will NEVER sucessfully expand outside of Sthn Australia
because it only has its boring
predictable
club comp
that is all

Um, hate to break it to you sunshine, but we have already demonstrated proven success with expansion in NSW and QLD. So much so that 2 extra teams have been added in each market. How's your expansion plans going?

& I hate to break it to you sunshine ... but that is a matter of opinion
if you had 5K attending matches in NSW & QLD.. deluded fools like you would still say the AFL had demonstrated success in expansion in these areas
at least the 2 teams the AFL had in NSW & QLD were hanging on .. just holding their own ... only a bit of an embarrasment
the 2 new teams added will kill off the experiment for good ... setting expansion back 30 years
the egotistical AFL just couldn't help itself ... goof F'ing riddance I say

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:26 am
by Truthsayer
pussycat wrote:Truthsayer wrote:What does Iron Chef have to do with the expansion of the codes?
Expansion, and successful expansion are two completely different things. It's intersting you think your game is national. Your presence in NSW is nothing more than a dot on a map. Almost 30 years on and the Swans regulary get beaten by SBS reruns in the ratings. And Queenslands not a whole lot better for you brainwashed mushrooms. Rugby Union is more of a national competition than your code.
Sounds to me like Demetriou suffers from penis envy.
It has already been pointed out that the program on SBS is not a re-run. I would add that rugby union does not have a presence in South Australia, the Northern Territory or Tasmania. I also heard a rumour (admittedly at least a couple of years old) that the Brumbies were on borrowed time in Canberra.
I PMed Mr TLPG to ask for his contribution to this matter, but I read his reply this morning that he wants nothing to do with this board. I recall reading that many grass roots clubs have formed in New South Wales, and that he was the source of that information. I asked him for more detail and I am awaiting his response.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:05 am
by pussycat
Truthsayer wrote:pussycat wrote:Truthsayer wrote:What does Iron Chef have to do with the expansion of the codes?
Expansion, and successful expansion are two completely different things. It's intersting you think your game is national. Your presence in NSW is nothing more than a dot on a map. Almost 30 years on and the Swans regulary get beaten by SBS reruns in the ratings. And Queenslands not a whole lot better for you brainwashed mushrooms. Rugby Union is more of a national competition than your code.
Sounds to me like Demetriou suffers from penis envy.
It has already been pointed out that the program on SBS is not a re-run. I would add that rugby union does not have a presence in South Australia, the Northern Territory or Tasmania. I also heard a rumour (admittedly at least a couple of years old) that the Brumbies were on borrowed time in Canberra.
I PMed Mr TLPG to ask for his contribution to this matter, but I read his reply this morning that he wants nothing to do with this board. I recall reading that many grass roots clubs have formed in New South Wales, and that he was the source of that information. I asked him for more detail and I am awaiting his response.
It was point out buy Onions - Wow. Check the records many wernt , but some are. What's it matter anyrate? Your really showing sines of desperation if your relying on the distiction between live and repeat screening of a Japaneese cooking shows on SBS to make a point.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:27 am
by Raiderdave
pussycat wrote:Truthsayer wrote:pussycat wrote:
Expansion, and successful expansion are two completely different things. It's intersting you think your game is national. Your presence in NSW is nothing more than a dot on a map. Almost 30 years on and the Swans regulary get beaten by SBS reruns in the ratings. And Queenslands not a whole lot better for you brainwashed mushrooms. Rugby Union is more of a national competition than your code.
Sounds to me like Demetriou suffers from penis envy.
It has already been pointed out that the program on SBS is not a re-run. I would add that rugby union does not have a presence in South Australia, the Northern Territory or Tasmania. I also heard a rumour (admittedly at least a couple of years old) that the Brumbies were on borrowed time in Canberra.
I PMed Mr TLPG to ask for his contribution to this matter, but I read his reply this morning that he wants nothing to do with this board. I recall reading that many grass roots clubs have formed in New South Wales, and that he was the source of that information. I asked him for more detail and I am awaiting his response.
It was point out buy Onions - Wow. Check the records many wernt , but some are. What's it matter anyrate? Your really showing sines of desperation if your relying on the distiction between live and repeat screening of a Japaneese cooking shows on SBS to make a point.
Exactly
who cares if it wsn't a re run
its a Friggin Japanese Cooking show on an FTA channel that attracts the least ratings of all FTA stations
what does that say about the so called success of their so called National Sport
abysmal failure isn't a strong enough term to describe it

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:59 am
by pussycat
Truthsayer wrote:pussycat wrote:Truthsayer wrote:What does Iron Chef have to do with the expansion of the codes?
Expansion, and successful expansion are two completely different things. It's intersting you think your game is national. Your presence in NSW is nothing more than a dot on a map. Almost 30 years on and the Swans regulary get beaten by SBS reruns in the ratings. And Queenslands not a whole lot better for you brainwashed mushrooms. Rugby Union is more of a national competition than your code.
Sounds to me like Demetriou suffers from penis envy.
It has already been pointed out that the program on SBS is not a re-run. I would add that rugby union does not have a presence in South Australia, the Northern Territory or Tasmania. I also heard a rumour (admittedly at least a couple of years old) that the Brumbies were on borrowed time in Canberra.
I PMed Mr TLPG to ask for his contribution to this matter, but I read his reply this morning that he wants nothing to do with this board. I recall reading that many grass roots clubs have formed in New South Wales, and that he was the source of that information. I asked him for more detail and I am awaiting his response.
I thought you were desperate before, but now I find out your relying on TLPG - you are in dire straits.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 12:57 pm
by Truthsayer
pussycat wrote:It was point out buy Onions - Wow. Check the records many wernt , but some are. What's it matter anyrate? Your really showing sines of desperation if your relying on the distiction between live and repeat screening of a Japaneese cooking shows on SBS to make a point.
It is well known that original showings of programs such as this rate much better than re-runs, except in cases of syndication in which SBS and the ABC do not participate. Only the commercial networks engage in such activity.
I am not relying on Mr TLPG. I am merely requesting further specifics on information I read so this can be verified. Is this a crime suddenly?
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 1:07 pm
by Raiderdave
Truthsayer wrote:pussycat wrote:It was point out buy Onions - Wow. Check the records many wernt , but some are. What's it matter anyrate? Your really showing sines of desperation if your relying on the distiction between live and repeat screening of a Japaneese cooking shows on SBS to make a point.
It is well known that original showings of programs such as this rate much better than re-runs, except in cases of syndication in which SBS and the ABC do not participate. Only the commercial networks engage in such activity.
I am not relying on
Mr TLPG. I am merely requesting further specifics on information I read so this can be verified.
Is this a crime suddenly?
It is if you're getting that peanut to verify anything
a crime against common sense
