Talking Footy

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol .
Of course they do .
Poor buddy was depressed .
Yet according to plenty his injuries always coincided with a drug test . Now he's depressed .
Lol sure

Captain deflector us at again

How is that dumbo . We were discussing drugs .
You should know
Your team is the biggest drug cheats in Aust sporting history .
We were discussing how the fumblers get out of it when caught .



You contribute nothing except some spazz rant about deflecting .

Now back to discussing the drugs.
How's essendrug going .
Peptides for All this yr?
Unknown drug cocktails ...offsite naturally For all ?

Lol biggest druggos in sport
Followed by mental midgets

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Firstly sarge you said players ....you know plural ,.
I said I know of one .
Why can't you name the others .
You said it dickhead



How can you clear your name when you can't even tell anyone what you were injected with .
Lol

You know what's hysterical
The same bunch of drug cheats are trying to get off on a technicality
Not clear their name .
As they & the club have since this started ,looking for a way to weasel out .
Lol
Pathetic bunch ....not surprising you support them .

Whilst my gramma can be criticised - the fact remains that A player was trafficking horse steroids to other players who were using and thus the statement is not a lie. 2nd name a court of appeal (which is not a de novo hearing) that can rehear the evidence in the case - so it would appear they have a good ground to appeal. If they been denied natural justice then they have every right to appeal. That's what a court of law is stupid! If the appeal was fundamentally flawed the the original finding stands and yes they do clear their name - your ignorance is really astounding.

Here your quote swines
See what you stated as FACT is 100% lies

Care to comment .
Youve run from this while we have laughed
The dummy spit & waa waa I'm leaving I'm leaving will be coming next .
It's a well worn track for you

Now if it's a fact & not a lie .
I'm sure you have some proof to back it up .

Come on sarge it's a fight club .
You've conceded before the fight began .
If you resort to telling straight out whoppers ...
You've lost .

Very fitting for a pathetic loser like you

.
Oh & im still waiting for proof of the SYD MAFIA running David Smith out of Sydney .
Another lie you won't go near ..

I'm seeing a pattern develop here .

Bump for the gutless flea who thinks its trolling for daring to ask for proof or a source to back up his straight out lies .
Where are ya sarge .
Off getting ready for Anzac Day .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Firstly sarge you said players ....you know plural ,.
I said I know of one .
Why can't you name the others .
You said it dickhead



How can you clear your name when you can't even tell anyone what you were injected with .
Lol

You know what's hysterical
The same bunch of drug cheats are trying to get off on a technicality
Not clear their name .
As they & the club have since this started ,looking for a way to weasel out .
Lol
Pathetic bunch ....not surprising you support them .

Whilst my gramma can be criticised - the fact remains that A player was trafficking horse steroids to other players who were using and thus the statement is not a lie. 2nd name a court of appeal (which is not a de novo hearing) that can rehear the evidence in the case - so it would appear they have a good ground to appeal. If they been denied natural justice then they have every right to appeal. That's what a court of law is stupid! If the appeal was fundamentally flawed the the original finding stands and yes they do clear their name - your ignorance is really astounding.

Here your quote swines
See what you stated as FACT is 100% lies

Care to comment .
Youve run from this while we have laughed
The dummy spit & waa waa I'm leaving I'm leaving will be coming next .
It's a well worn track for you

Now if it's a fact & not a lie .
I'm sure you have some proof to back it up .

Come on sarge it's a fight club .
You've conceded before the fight began .
If you resort to telling straight out whoppers ...
You've lost .

Very fitting for a pathetic loser like you

.
Oh & im still waiting for proof of the SYD MAFIA running David Smith out of Sydney .
Another lie you won't go near ..

I'm seeing a pattern develop here .

Bump for the gutless flea who thinks its trolling for daring to ask for proof or a source to back up his straight out lies .
Where are ya sarge .
Off getting ready for Anzac Day .

Bump again for the gutless lying skirt .

Sarge . Why are you avoiding discussing this .

Jesus son ...grow a set .

Fucking skirt ...no balls

Swans4ever wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

They've both been charged Xman ya silly git. Why? Because both the club and hirdy are guilty.

The players are next in the firing line.

We could be witnessing the largest fall from grace for a single sporting club in the history of Australian sports here folks. Stay tuned!

What Cronulla is getting off Scott free are they - just because the NRL have totally and incompetently handled the whole issue doesn't mean there fall won't be as if not substantial worse! Why don't you include them in this statement KE not showing your bias are you?

Anyone remember swines hanging this rotten turd in this thread?

And as time passes we now see Cronulla, innocent and in the top four. While essendon lie at the bottom of the AFL comp and have become the greatest shame job in Australian sporting history.

I'm kinda like Cronulla. Swines is kinda like essendon.

Essendon serving their time, but are re-signing all their banned players one by one. Have some fantastic talent coming through so next year looks bright.

On this year, theyve won one game, been soundly beaten in a few, yet have still averaged nearly 50k home games. Just goes to show the following the AFL has

This thread should be made a classic & bumped at every opportunity .
It highlights the weird world some fumblers live in .
The delusions ...the lying to try to make Out Cronulla was as bad .
Lol
It's a good cure for depression .

How was Cronulla not as bad?

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol he asked a question .
He didn't state something was a FACT .
That clearly wasn't .
Like you did .


Like shooting fish in a barrel

Yeah and you have your head in the sand to think that somehow what happened with RL and Cronulla was anything but just as bad as Essendon! You really will call black white if it suits you. It's like arguing with a 2 yr old!

In a thread full of rampant fumble stupidity .
This is still one of my faves

So the Sharks were as bad as essingbong .


Which club had far more players involved .
Which club had the drug program run for far far longer
Which club tried everything possible to stall/ stop & suppress info .
Which club had 34 players outed for 2 years ..
Not CRONULLA

Lol
Yeh I could see how they're nearly identical
If I had my head firmly wedged up my arse


As Ke said
The Sharks are in a far better place now than essingbong .
In fact they will probably be top of the table by the end of this round .
That's what happens when you put your hand up & accept you fucked up .

Honesty ....essingdrug wouldn't know what the word meant

Cronulla players admitted taking multiple banned substances. Cronulla players never checked with their club staff or doctor. Cronulla players were given a lighter sentence because they took a deal.

Essendon players checked with their club officials to ensure they were being given compliant substances. They were only banned for 2 years because they wouldnt take a deal. They were only charged with taking one banned substance

Who is worse?

Xman wrote:

Cronulla players admitted taking multiple banned substances. Cronulla players never checked with their club staff or doctor. Cronulla players were given a lighter sentence because they took a deal.

Essendon players checked with their club officials to ensure they were being given compliant substances. They were only banned for 2 years because they wouldnt take a deal. They were only charged with taking one banned substance

Who is worse?

The essingdon dopers. Guilty as charged.

Disgusting club. Don't care about their players mi wouldn't be surprised if some of those dosed up skinny boys have begun developing weird bodily side effects by now they were that pumped with juices.

And swines and x,an thought they were going to get let off easy

You seem to be claiming they didnt know they were given banned substances. Wouldnt that mean they werent as bad as the Cronulla players?

The club and the players and golden boy aka I've been injecting meself with cow placentas and pigs brains hird are guilty as charged. The law has spoken, justice has been served and poor ol xman still cant cop it sweet!

What a sad sorry git you are. Or are you just joshin with us and you know theyre as guilty as sin? Either way its fukked but I guess the second option is less fukked

They were banned for using one substance. Cronulla players confessed to using multiple banned drugs including one given to horses

The essendopers were systemically using the hard stuff for yonkers. And they got punished as they should have been. The very few Cronulla weren't innocent and justice was brought to them as it should have been.

One club have disgraced emselves and it aint Cronulla bro. Open dem eyes