Talking Footy

Vlad Tepes wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

a club that is 3 years old versus a club that is what 30 years old?

How in gods green earth are we going backwards?

We are 3 years old, we have one the Premiership, been in two grandfinals and won the biggest club game in the Asian Champions League. How can you possibly call any of that going backwards?

We are about to fly to another international competition with the possibility of playing Real Madrid. Which will put our combined winnings at around $4 million. We have just re-signed our foundation sponsor in the NRMA to a further 3 years and is one of the largest sponsorship deals in the A League

We made a profit after our second year of existence, this year we are likely to be the most profitable A League club .

We have just signed off on the construction of our training facilities at Blacktown, which is stage 1 of a 2 Stage project worth about $15 million which will become our center of excellence and will be our Youth Academy for players from 11 years old

We are last in the A League, yep a really bad start, but we still have about 3/4 of the season to go

So I ask again how could any of those things indicate that we are going backwards, you clearly don't have a clue.

I noticed you were very quiet about our lack of crowds when we once again got a bigger crowd than Parra did during the 2014 season at Pirtek.

So once again how the fuck is any of that indicators we are going backwards

Can't argue with that

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Yet you still won't answer my question .
Why are you comparing Wsderpers to Canb.

You avoided all the points I made .

Lol ,you are a little bit worried that the only way wyour team can look good is to compare to the Raiders.
5x the population to draw from .
Play in summer...only competition is the occasional cricket game.
Recent success to get band wagoners on board.

Lol

Keep avoiding the question porky.
It shows you have nothing ....just deflection ..

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Ratings are bad ,crowds are going backwards .
Yeh .
Despite the success infield ,the chest beating by fans ,media,etc.
The fact remains that crowds are down .
TV ratings ..lol 55k .just lol again .are terrible .
But you keep deflecting ..it's all you have .

post_hoc wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Ratings are bad ,crowds are going backwards .
Yeh .
Despite the success infield ,the chest beating by fans ,media,etc.
The fact remains that crowds are down .
TV ratings ..lol 55k .just lol again .are terrible .
But you keep deflecting ..it's all you have .

Clearly you ignore the points I make, pretty much arguing with you is like arguing with a 2 yr old.

3 years old, bigger crowds than Parramatta at Pirtek, bigger crowds than the raiders.

Arguing with you is like arguing with a 2 yr old

sydneyfc wrote:

11,322 for SFC x PG

our best midweek crowd ever(excluding ACL):D

Raiderdave wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

11,322 for SFC x PG

our best midweek crowd ever(excluding ACL):D

:_<>

Yeah
Thumbs up :_<>

sydneyfc wrote:

A-LEAGUE SYD V PERTH FOX SPORTS 4 79,000

Vlad Tepes wrote:

As much as I hate loosing it's good to finally see Glory field what seems to be a genuinely competitive squad in the HAL. Hopefully they can recapture that old NSL Glory in the terraces so the crowds start heading north again. 9 seasons of on-field mediocrity has understandably dampened some of the supporters' passion.

Vlad Tepes wrote:

I'm surprised you know how to spell 'losing'. Judging from the level of your banter you have an IQ of somewhere between 70-80.