Talking Footy

Beaussie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 21, 2018 11:13 am

Better Homes and Gardens outrates Friday Night Live NRL right across the country last night. What tha? Well done Channel 7.

BETTER HOMES AND GARDENS Network 7 542,000 170,000 196,000 97,000 20,000 59,000
FRIDAY NIGHT NRL LIVE Network 9 426,000 166,000 51,000 197,000 5,000 7,000

https://tvtonight.com.au/2018/04/friday ... -2018.html

Ah here we go
the BEA spin & bullshit .....
Right across the country .lol
Not in Bris ...but let's not let that fact get in the way of your crap .

& me thinks this is Beas deflection from the fact that the STORM live into Mel outrated the Swans live into Syd .


.

Maybe some more cola or other made up crap to help the swans cheat might improve their ratings .

NlolRL wrote: ↑Sat Apr 21, 2018 12:44 pm

1.06m for rhe AFL despite the game being on 7mate everywhere except Melbourne and Adelaide.

Where as the NRL was on 9 into Melbourne.

This was a very comparable game, 2 popular heartland clubs v an expansion team, all reasonably successful of late.

And what do you know? The AFL won easily, again.

Maybe its because the AFL didnt show the lions v suns......lol

Isn't That how the AFL usually work there ratings Friday night?

An what do you know the NRL got more in Melbourne than the AFL got in Sydney

How would that that even be possible? Lions and Suns are both banned from Friday night.

pussycat wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 10:21 am

NlolRL wrote: ↑Sat Apr 21, 2018 12:44 pm

1.06m for rhe AFL despite the game being on 7mate everywhere except Melbourne and Adelaide.

Where as the NRL was on 9 into Melbourne.

This was a very comparable game, 2 popular heartland clubs v an expansion team, all reasonably successful of late.

And what do you know? The AFL won easily, again.

Maybe its because the AFL didnt show the lions v suns......lol

Isn't That how the AFL usually work there ratings Friday night?

An what do you know the NRL got more in Melbourne than the AFL got in Sydney

How would that that even be possible? Lions and Suns are both banned from Friday night.

but that's basically your only counterargument! You ignore the fact our better games outrate your better games.

Saturday STV AFLSaintsGiants 170k - 1.30pm shown in isolation
Saturday STV #AFLBluesEagles 243k - 4.30pm shown in isolation
Saturday STV #AFLPowerCats 235k - 7.30pm shown concurrently
Saturday STV #AFLFreoDogs 91k - 8pm shown concurrently

Saturday STV #NRLSouthsRaiders 168k - 3pm shown in isolation
Saturday STV #NRLCowboysTitans 273k - 5.30pm shown in isolation
Saturday STV #NRLTigersKnights 303k - 7.30pm shown in isolation

Well look at that! The AFL's afternoon games were shown in isolation for once, and the results were 1 ratings win each, despite the AFL being on FTA at the same time. THEN the AFL had 2 games shown concurrently in the evening and one of the games rated well below any other game. However, they still totalled well over 300k combined

There it is folks, definitive proof of the effect of concurrent scheduling. It basically halves the total TV audience of both games (as I've been saying)

Thanks for coming

Congradulations, You've finally proven that your overlap theory is shit!

Your 2 Saturday night matches one involving Geelong(a Friday night team) and Freemantle (a non Friday night team)

Your High rating team 235k , Your side that doesn't rate 91k

And if you want to compare games. Our opening match was a very ordinary affair but still got as many as your draw. and in the middle games, our last 3 years wooden spooner ran out comfortable winners.

pussycat wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 11:59 am

Congradulations, You've finally proven that your overlap theory is shit!

Your 2 Saturday night matches one involving Geelong(a Friday night team) and Freemantle (a non Friday night team)

Your High rating team 235k , Your side that doesn't rate 91k

And if you want to compare games. Our opening match was a very ordinary affair but still got as many as your draw. and in the middle games, our last 3 years wooden spooner ran out comfortable winners.

FMD youre a dickhead. You've used two games shown concurrently to prove my overlap theory is shit??

They were shown concurrently you moron! Neutral viewers had 2 choices, watch Geelong v Port, which was 5th v 7th, or watch 9th v 16th. Obviously neutrals watched the better match! Fact is there were more people watching the AFL on STV than the NRL at 8pm last night, despite the fact the AFL was also on FTA.

Then we have the real story of the day with the 2 Saturday afternoon AFL games shown in isolation which rated comparably to the NRL's games despite the AFL starting at 1.30pm, and also being shown on FTA to Perth. Question, did these 2 AFL games rate far higher on STV than our typical afternoon games? The answer of course is YES. The reason IS NOT because they were better matchups, because saints are a small Melbourne club, and the giants are even smaller. The Blues are a poor performing Melbourne club, and the Eagles saw the game in the early afternoon on FTA. And talking about wooden spooners, the Saints and Blues have been shit on field for years.

Yesterday proves my 'theory' (which is just fact, no theory about it) is correct. How you can try to argue otherwise is ridiculous

As for Fremantle not rating well, it has nothing to do with their popularity, it's to do with the fact they are playing shit. 5 years ago when the were playing well their ratings were huge

Fremantle’s last gasp home game thriller against Essendon on Friday night at Patersons Stadium attracted the biggest TV audience for a Perth-based home and away game for any AFL team in the past decade, averaging 1.33 million viewers nationally. http://www.fremantlefc.com.au/news/2013 ... tv-ratings

Go Back To Your Fishbowl!

So did yesterday afternoon's afl games rate better on stv than our usual saturday afternoon games or not?

AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 21, 2018 1:13 pm

Beaussie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 21, 2018 11:13 am

Better Homes and Gardens outrates Friday Night Live NRL right across the country last night. What tha? Well done Channel 7.

BETTER HOMES AND GARDENS Network 7 542,000 170,000 196,000 97,000 20,000 59,000
FRIDAY NIGHT NRL LIVE Network 9 426,000 166,000 51,000 197,000 5,000 7,000

https://tvtonight.com.au/2018/04/friday ... -2018.html

STORM live

You think Channel 9 would be happy with 51,000 prime time on their primary channel in Melbourne?





SUNDAY AFTERNOON NRL LIVE Nine 295,000 188,000 0 106,000 0 0

Lol deflection alert
What about the storm in Melb outrating the swans in SYD

You seem to be very quiet about that.

AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 5:35 pm

Lol deflection alert
What about the storm in Melb outrating the swans in SYD

You seem to be very quiet about that.

Sydney was on 7 mate, Storm was on Ch9

So fucking what
It's still FTA
Secondary channels have been around for a decade .
That excuse is getting old

AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 22, 2018 5:40 pm

So fucking what
It's still FTA
Secondary channels have been around for a decade .
That excuse is getting old

again, whether it's an old excuse or not the ratings consistently show the same result. Primary channels always rate well above secondary channels. Whenever either of the storm or swans are shown on the primary channel they always rate well above their secondary channel average.

Given the difference between the shows that are shown on the Main channel and those shown secondary channel what would you expert?

I'm sure I read Perth's highest AFL's ratings came on 7mate, even though Perth is often shown on the main channel many times.