Talking Footy

The way that I would do it,(not exact) is that you work out how many are watching it on FTA lets say 50K. If you know that 35% of Sydney households have foxtel then you add 35%of 50k and add up the total. It is not exact and would be a rough guess. Most people with foxtel prefer to watch the game on Fox because there are no adds. With the Melbourne game if you had a FTA component (hopefully next year they do). Then you could guess roughly how many would be watching it on Fox.

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

enarelle wrote:

The Swans TV ratings, despite the fact that all their home games have been shown live on FTA for several years, have been in constant decline. Go back and look at he ratings from 2008 thru to 2011 when Fox was not an issue. The party has been over for a couple of years.

!
Bs

In 2008 they averaged around 100 on the primary channel. Now they average 50-60k on a secondary channel plus foxtel.

Quick question for all our AFL fans here?

344,000 Storm Vs Manly how much of this pay tv ratings came from melbourne?

I bet way more then the swans game...... =D> =D>

enarelle is correct, the Swans tv ratings in Sydney are in decline and so is their support. Every time you got nothing Xman you try and wriggle out and make up crap, now you want to add foxtel to the list of Sydney viewers just pathetic and smelling more and more like desperation from you and TPLG every day.

Well given the swans rate far higher in sydney than the storm do in Melbourne on FtA, and the swans are shown concurrently on fox, there would be far more people watching the swans in Sydney than the storm in Melbourne.

Haveing a look at the attendances of each team is an indication as well.

The best way to gauge the Swans TV ratings this year is to take 10% off what they averaged FTA last year when they did not have the concurrent Foxtel issue. A 10% decline is their average over the last five years. After 30 years this is where they are at.

enarelle wrote:

The best way to gauge the Swans TV ratings this year is to take 10% off what they averaged FTA last year when they did not have the concurrent Foxtel issue. A 10% decline is their average over the last five years. After 30 years this is where they are at.

Prove it.....

It aint exactly hard. Just have a look at the Swans ratings on this site. Look at 2008 and then 2011. No one from the Swans denies that they have seen a decline over the last 5 years in a range of areas including TV.

enarelle wrote:

It aint exactly hard. Just have a look at the Swans ratings on this site. Look at 2008 and then 2011. No one from the Swans denies that they have seen a decline over the last 5 years in a range of areas including TV.

The swans had a successful period in 2004-2007. A drop in ratings is expected. This year has been better with a ratings average close to 60-70k FTA on a secondary digital channel, plus more on foxtel.

All things considered these are better figures than 2008.

The Swans have done so well they got "promoted" to a secondary channel. Their 2011 figures are theircurrent benchmark. There is no logical reason to assume that suddenly Sydney people have started watching them on Foxtel to create a higher aggregate score. The Swans just arent relevant to the wider community.

enarelle wrote:

The Swans have done so well they got "promoted" to a secondary channel. Their 2011 figures are theircurrent benchmark. There is no logical reason to assume that suddenly Sydney people have started watching them on Foxtel to create a higher aggregate score. The Swans just arent relevant to the wider community.

You do realise many of their FTA matches prior to 2012 were also on foxtel?

YES but there were plenty that were not and they give you a true indication of the Sydney viewing audience.

enarelle wrote:

YES but there were plenty that were not and they give you a true indication of the Sydney viewing audience.

I would have thought the average would show the level of interest the lows would be due to other factors like the opponent. Having a winning team would also effect ratings. What's the storms excuse given theyre virtually unbeatable?

00h... The Swanies have been outrated again by Iron Chef replays on SBS.

pussycat wrote:

00h... The Swanies have been outrated again by Iron Chef replays on SBS.

Virtually every program on TV outrates the NRL in AFL states.

Xman wrote:

pussycat wrote:

00h... The Swanies have been outrated again by Iron Chef replays on SBS.

Virtually every program on TV outrates the NRL in AFL states.

Actually I dont think theres to many shows that get 360K in Melbourne.

pussycat wrote:

Xman wrote:

pussycat wrote:

00h... The Swanies have been outrated again by Iron Chef replays on SBS.

Virtually every program on TV outrates the NRL in AFL states.

Actually I dont think theres to many shows that get 360K in Melbourne.

Really?



30k regularly for fn NRL this year, from 3 cities!

But that's not what you said.. You can't back it up (as per usual)