Talking Footy

pussycat wrote:

Stewie , who is it again sucking up to The Tv networks? selling them every possible thing they could? arse backwards

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Why do the fumbleballers care which fucking channel the footy is on, they'll be watching their shower of shit anyway.

What you really are worried about though is the fact the NRL is 200 million behind the vFL already with NZ, Radio, Internet and naming rights still to come.

Then there's the other interesting bit, the ARLC finally caught back up to the vFL 17 years after the SL war, in that 17 years, all the big money went to one code instead of the two like it used too (NSWRL was the first to get 100 million TV contract).

The next TV rights deal will be the interesting one where News and 9 have no say what so ever in regards to RL in the region, how do you think the rights will go seeing as the jump the NRL just had must have made Vlad shit his best Sunday pants?

I know a few of you in here shit yourselves after running the game down none stop for years telling everyone who's listen that the nRL would be lucky to get 500 million.

no one anticipated the nRL would take cash over decent coverage and control of their schedule! Who would have thought they could be THAT stupid!

AS if the ARU didn't have enough problems on its hands with disgruntled five-eighth Quade Cooper, now comes a report that shows viewers are turning off the game in droves.

Global sports research agency Repucom International has just finished compiling its 2012 Football Benchmarking Report, which compares figures from Australia's football codes - AFL, NRL, Super Rugby and the A-League - based on OzTAM ratings and AGB Nielsen audience research.

While AFL and the A-League were the big winners and the NRL remained steady, it was the alarming dip in fans watching the Super Rugby competition that should have the powerbrokers at ARU headquarters concerned.

Having drawn a cumulative audience of 8.8 million when the Queensland Reds won their first title in 2011, that figure slumped to 7.8 million this year when the Reds were the only team of five Australian franchises to make the finals.

Despite their inability to win back-to-back titles, the Reds were still the most popular franchise with 1.89 million viewers followed by the NSW Waratahs with 1.71 million and Melbourne Rebels with 1.33 million.

"Super Rugby had a disappointing season, no doubt on the back of sub-standard performances by the Australian franchises," Repucom International's Asia, Australia and New Zealand managing director, Lynne Anderson, said yesterday.

"Comparisons with the 2011 season were always going to be difficult, given the huge wave of success that saw the Reds take out the trophy."

The AFL announced its record $1.253 billion media rights deal last year and capitalised on a boom in subscription television broadcasts which were up from 19.3 million viewers in 2011 to 39.3 million this year - an increase of 101 per cent.

Although free-to-air viewers dropped from 94 million to 84 million this year, or a loss of 10.69 per cent, the massive increase in pay-TV watchers was enough to help the AFL record an increase of 8.59 per cent across the board.

Collingwood was the most watched club with 24.26 million viewers followed by Hawthorn with 22.30 million and premier Sydney with 19.83 million.

The NRL has also benefited from a lucrative $1.023bn media rights deal recently but showed only a marginal increase in viewers from 113.5 million to 113.9 million, or 0.37 per cent, this year.

Brisbane was the most popular team with 22.91 million viewers followed by the Bulldogs with 21.80 million and South Sydney with 19.75 million.

However, it is another test considered more accurate - which counts a viewer only once throughout the season - that shows the gap between AFL and NRL might not be as big as first thought: the gap between the two codes was only 128,000 viewers in favour of the AFL.

The other big winner was the A-League, which has also recently negotiated a $160m media rights deal. Figures show its viewing audience had jumped from 7.5 million last year to 9.5 million in 2012 - an increase of 26.72 per cent.

Brisbane Roar drew the most viewers with 2.44 million followed by Melbourne Victory with 2.34 million and Perth Glory with 2.06 million.

It is a figure that will climb higher next year with the addition of several star imports this season - most notably Italian superstar Alessandro Del Piero.

"The A League had a great year in 2011-12, producing the largest increase of all football codes with a 27 per cent increase in cumulative audiences," Anderson said.

"And this figure will be resoundingly beaten in the current season, with the Del Piero and Emile Heskey presence, especially producing substantial increases across all consumption metrics for the game."

Xman wrote:

AS if the ARU didn't have enough problems on its hands with disgruntled five-eighth Quade Cooper, now comes a report that shows viewers are turning off the game in droves.

Global sports research agency Repucom International has just finished compiling its 2012 Football Benchmarking Report, which compares figures from Australia's football codes - AFL, NRL, Super Rugby and the A-League - based on OzTAM ratings and AGB Nielsen audience research.

While AFL and the A-League were the big winners and the NRL remained steady, it was the alarming dip in fans watching the Super Rugby competition that should have the powerbrokers at ARU headquarters concerned.

Having drawn a cumulative audience of 8.8 million when the Queensland Reds won their first title in 2011, that figure slumped to 7.8 million this year when the Reds were the only team of five Australian franchises to make the finals.

Despite their inability to win back-to-back titles, the Reds were still the most popular franchise with 1.89 million viewers followed by the NSW Waratahs with 1.71 million and Melbourne Rebels with 1.33 million.

"Super Rugby had a disappointing season, no doubt on the back of sub-standard performances by the Australian franchises," Repucom International's Asia, Australia and New Zealand managing director, Lynne Anderson, said yesterday.

"Comparisons with the 2011 season were always going to be difficult, given the huge wave of success that saw the Reds take out the trophy."

The AFL announced its record $1.253 billion media rights deal last year and capitalised on a boom in subscription television broadcasts which were up from 19.3 million viewers in 2011 to 39.3 million this year - an increase of 101 per cent.

Although free-to-air viewers dropped from 94 million to 84 million this year, or a loss of 10.69 per cent, the massive increase in pay-TV watchers was enough to help the AFL record an increase of 8.59 per cent across the board.

Collingwood was the most watched club with 24.26 million viewers followed by Hawthorn with 22.30 million and premier Sydney with 19.83 million.

The NRL has also benefited from a lucrative $1.023bn media rights deal recently but showed only a marginal increase in viewers from 113.5 million to 113.9 million, or 0.37 per cent, this year.

Brisbane was the most popular team with 22.91 million viewers followed by the Bulldogs with 21.80 million and South Sydney with 19.75 million.

However, it is another test considered more accurate - which counts a viewer only once throughout the season - that shows the gap between AFL and NRL might not be as big as first thought: the gap between the two codes was only 128,000 viewers in favour of the AFL.

The other big winner was the A-League, which has also recently negotiated a $160m media rights deal. Figures show its viewing audience had jumped from 7.5 million last year to 9.5 million in 2012 - an increase of 26.72 per cent.

Brisbane Roar drew the most viewers with 2.44 million followed by Melbourne Victory with 2.34 million and Perth Glory with 2.06 million.

It is a figure that will climb higher next year with the addition of several star imports this season - most notably Italian superstar Alessandro Del Piero.

"The A League had a great year in 2011-12, producing the largest increase of all football codes with a 27 per cent increase in cumulative audiences," Anderson said.

"And this figure will be resoundingly beaten in the current season, with the Del Piero and Emile Heskey presence, especially producing substantial increases across all consumption metrics for the game."

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/af ... 6525246762

Well there it is people. Victory to the AFL 123m to the NRL 113m, with Collingwood the most watched team at 24m

Xman wrote:

firstly Dave, I thought SOO was NRL.....

And If youre including all those rep games then Im sure its only fair we include all the foxtel footy shows, the foxtel replays, the brownlow, the preseason cup, the Ch9 footy shows, the channel 7 footy shows, the channel 10 footy shows. After all, theyre all AFL

Its an NRL v AFL comparison Dave. Your game has stalled, ours has grown.

Most importantly, but but but......

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

firstly Dave, I thought SOO was NRL.....

And If youre including all those rep games then Im sure its only fair we include all the foxtel footy shows, the foxtel replays, the brownlow, the preseason cup, the Ch9 footy shows, the channel 7 footy shows, the channel 10 footy shows. After all, theyre all AFL

Its an NRL v AFL comparison Dave. Your game has stalled, ours has grown.

Most importantly, but but but......

games of football .... d head
include them only

our 2011 figure was 129 Million
SOO increased by 1.5 Million on last year

we win ..... AGAIN

when will you lot ever ... catch us

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

firstly Dave, I thought SOO was NRL.....

And If youre including all those rep games then Im sure its only fair we include all the foxtel footy shows, the foxtel replays, the brownlow, the preseason cup, the Ch9 footy shows, the channel 7 footy shows, the channel 10 footy shows. After all, theyre all AFL

Its an NRL v AFL comparison Dave. Your game has stalled, ours has grown.

Most importantly, but but but......

games of football .... d head
include them only

our 2011 figure was 129 Million
SOO increased by 1.5 Million on last year

we win ..... AGAIN

when will you lot ever ... catch us

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

firstly Dave, I thought SOO was NRL.....

And If youre including all those rep games then Im sure its only fair we include all the foxtel footy shows, the foxtel replays, the brownlow, the preseason cup, the Ch9 footy shows, the channel 7 footy shows, the channel 10 footy shows. After all, theyre all AFL

Its an NRL v AFL comparison Dave. Your game has stalled, ours has grown.

Most importantly, but but but......

games of football .... d head
include them only

our 2011 figure was 129 Million
SOO increased by 1.5 Million on last year

we win ..... AGAIN

when will you lot ever ... catch us

According to who?

We try to compare the leagues of NRL and AFL but when you lose you claim all other forms of RL should also be included.

Well the figures exclude the AFLs preseason cup and the numerous AFL game replays on foxtel. Arent they games?

This then becomes a "our sport v your sport" comparison. Therefore we should be allowed to include the brownlow and the many many sports shows dedicated to AFL.

So, either league v league or everything v everything.

Which one? We win both!

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

firstly Dave, I thought SOO was NRL.....

And If youre including all those rep games then Im sure its only fair we include all the foxtel footy shows, the foxtel replays, the brownlow, the preseason cup, the Ch9 footy shows, the channel 7 footy shows, the channel 10 footy shows. After all, theyre all AFL

Its an NRL v AFL comparison Dave. Your game has stalled, ours has grown.

Most importantly, but but but......

games of football .... d head
include them only

our 2011 figure was 129 Million
SOO increased by 1.5 Million on last year

we win ..... AGAIN

when will you lot ever ... catch us

According to who?

We try to compare the leagues of NRL and AFL but when you lose you claim all other forms of RL should also be included.

Well the figures exclude the AFLs preseason cup and the numerous AFL game replays on foxtel. Arent they games?

This then becomes a "our sport v your sport" comparison. Therefore we should be allowed to include the brownlow and the many many sports shows dedicated to AFL.

So, either league v league or everything v everything.

Which one? We win both!

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

firstly Dave, I thought SOO was NRL.....

And If youre including all those rep games then Im sure its only fair we include all the foxtel footy shows, the foxtel replays, the brownlow, the preseason cup, the Ch9 footy shows, the channel 7 footy shows, the channel 10 footy shows. After all, theyre all AFL

Its an NRL v AFL comparison Dave. Your game has stalled, ours has grown.

Most importantly, but but but......

games of football .... d head
include them only

our 2011 figure was 129 Million
SOO increased by 1.5 Million on last year

we win ..... AGAIN

when will you lot ever ... catch us

but but but

123 million > 113 million. End of