Page 23 of 185
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:20 pm
by Onions
EVERYTHING! Including the Swans, Kitten, you fucking lying little shit!
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:44 pm
by pussycat
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:01 pm
by Onions
Iron Chef is NOT a fucking re-run! I'm getting fucking sick of your stupid lies. Two of those sources are fucking FORUMS!!
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:21 pm
by pussycat
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:13 pm
by Onions
It's NOT a fucking re-run! Learn to fucking read, Kitten!
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:21 pm
by Raiderdave
Onions wrote:Iron Chef is NOT a ******* re-run! I'm getting ******* sick of your stupid lies. Two of those sources are ******* FORUMS!!
who cares if it isn't
its a freaking Japanese cooking show
on SBS
belting the tripe out of the Swans .... its embarrasing
AFL is doomed in Sydney ... doomed
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:08 pm
by Onions
Not fucking doomed! Live with it, if you fucking can! Iron Chef is a ratings blockbuster by SBS standards and everyone wants fucking Japanese food! Hell I eat Japanese! Sushi fucking rocks!
The number 1 football code in Australia is fucking AFL! :D
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:02 pm
by Truthsayer
Mr Raider, it's a false argument to try and suggest that a game is doomed simply because it failed to rate it's boots off in one city. May I suggest you compare the attendance of the game to attendances at NRL games in Sydney if you wish to truly indicate the state of the game in the harbour city?
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:50 am
by Raiderdave
Truthsayer wrote:Mr Raider, it's a false argument to try and suggest that a game is doomed simply because it failed to rate it's boots off in one city. May I suggest you compare the attendance of the game to attendances at NRL games in Sydney if you wish to truly indicate the state of the game in the harbour city?
attendances are one part of the equation , but its not a pretty picture for giggleball here either .... the NRL has up to 170,000 regular attendees for its sport in the City of Sydney compared to the AFL's approx 26 to 27,000
so there is no comparison there.... to suggest its because the NRL has more clubs as being the sole reason is also naive & misguided
if the AFL increased its number of clubs in Sydney to 9 do you seriously think it could also maintain an average of 17K like the NRL has
I think not .... in fact I'd say it will barely be above this next year with 2 sides in our countrys largest city
but even if the stadiums were full for Swans games in Sydney
( which they are not .. they are barely half full ) then where would Sydneysiders get their weekly fix of AFL then ?.. of course in their living rooms on TV.. a great gauge of the depth of interest in most things
I mean if you can't even be bothered to push a botton on a remote to watch something.. you are hardly interested are you ?
so how is your game doing on the box in Sydney ?
ah ..
.... ummm
it can't outrate a re run of the brady bunch
:_<>
:_<>
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:38 pm
by Onions
They'll get in with GWS next year, fuck wit! Numbers will go up, and then where will your fucking up code be?? NOWHERE!! So shut the fuck up and accept that WE ARE WINNING!!
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 5:14 pm
by Truthsayer
Raiderdave wrote:attendances are one part of the equation , but its not a pretty picture for giggleball here either .... the NRL has up to 170,000 regular attendees for its sport in the City of Sydney compared to the AFL's approx 26 to 27,000
In a city of 4 million people, I would have thought that 170,000 was a serious problem and not something to crow about. In a city not that much smaller (Melbourne) the total AFL attendance is much higher. In the other direction, the Swans are doing better in average terms than the Storm.
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:42 pm
by Raiderdave
Truthsayer wrote:Raiderdave wrote:attendances are one part of the equation , but its not a pretty picture for giggleball here either .... the NRL has up to 170,000 regular attendees for its sport in the City of Sydney compared to the AFL's approx 26 to 27,000
In a city of 4 million people, I would have thought that 170,000 was a serious problem and not something to crow about. In a city not that much smaller (Melbourne) the total AFL attendance is much higher. In the other direction, the Swans are doing better in average terms than the Storm.
in a city of
4.5 million people ... I would have thought 27,000 is an even bigger problem & even less to crow about
Swans have been up here for 30 years
the Storm a mere 13 in Melbourne
lets see how the Storm are doing in 2028
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:52 pm
by Truthsayer
In a city that is not AFL heartland I would call 27,000 a rather good result.
Meanwhile in Melbourne we have much more than 170,000 going to games in it's heartland.
I refuse to make future predictions. Only fools engage in that sort of conduct.
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:59 pm
by Onions
Meanwhile the Storm averages 14K a fucking game! Swans win!
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:30 pm
by Beaussie
Oh and Storm are on top of the ladder, play in finals just about every season and go on to win premierships. Is there a bandwagon developing? Haha, as if... Average crowds of 13k in sports mad Melbourne. Any wonder why they lose more than $10 million a season? Any wonder why News Ltd is desperate to get out of the game. Absolute rabble and the locals in Melbourne cannot stand them. Don't take my word for it, just look at the abysmal home town support the Storm attract.
