Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Xman wrote:

N rl have increaed fox games by 40% and live fta games by 50%, so an increased total was inevitable

Have individual games increased?

They have, well and truly!

We had 3 FTA games last year, the same as this year.

One of those is live not delayed , That is the only difference. Face it you getting

so which games this year have rated higher than last year?

We have better things to do than waste our valuable time answering your fucken dopey questions.

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

N rl have increaed fox games by 40% and live fta games by 50%, so an increased total was inevitable

Have individual games increased?

So i showed you about 5million viewers increase and you ask the question have individual games increased................... :_<> :_<> :_<>

Oh i dont know....Maybe they have old chap..

Maybe you need to look a little harder and put some more time into your questions.

Stop wasting our time with kindergarten grade questions.

its a fair question you seem to be avoiding. If the increase in ratings is due to the change in scheduling the individual games will rate fairly similar to last year, but the total will be higher because the live games have increased by 50% and the fox games by 40%

if the NRL is now more popular on TV (which seems unlikely given the crowds are slightly down again) the individual games will be rating better compared to last year.

So, again, are you individual games rating higher than last year? How do your best fox and FTA games compare to last year?

Fri TV Seven/7mate #AFLHawksCrows Seven 608k (Mel 407k Ade 201k) 7mate 158k (Syd 40k Bri 17k Per 101k)
= 766k plus 254k for regionals = 1.011m without fox

#NRLBroncosSouths Nine 476k (Syd 252k Bri 225k) Gem 39k (Mel 20k Ade 5k Per 14k) = 515k FTA + 343k for regionals = 858k without fox

So, whatbut but buts will the throwballers come up with today?

Xman wrote:

Fri TV Seven/7mate #AFLHawksCrows Seven 608k (Mel 407k Ade 201k) 7mate 158k (Syd 40k Bri 17k Per 101k)
= 766k plus 254k for regionals = 1.011m without fox

#NRLBroncosSouths Nine 476k (Syd 252k Bri 225k) Gem 39k (Mel 20k Ade 5k Per 14k) = 515k FTA + 343k for regionals = 858k without fox

So, whatbut but buts will the throwballers come up with today?

Unlike you were very secure, very satisfied with our 20% increase this year . We aren't about to shoot our load over one match.

Xman wrote:

Fri TV Seven/7mate #AFLHawksCrows Seven 608k (Mel 407k Ade 201k) 7mate 158k (Syd 40k Bri 17k Per 101k)
= 766k plus 254k for regionals = 1.011m without fox

#NRLBroncosSouths Nine 476k (Syd 252k Bri 225k) Gem 39k (Mel 20k Ade 5k Per 14k) = 515k FTA + 343k for regionals = 858k without fox

So, whatbut but buts will the throwballers come up with today?

Your still alive, that's good to see.

Was beginning to think something happened to you blokes, might call of that search party now..

Its good that you can get 1 win every 2 weeks and then disappear for 2 weeks until the next win comes around...

We are up easily over %20, the AFL is down simple as that really.

Ill see you in here in 2 weeks time when you get your next win...

Everyone the Fumblers have been found no need to worry about calling the missing persons hotline.....if they disappear for another 2-3 weeks this time we will just asume they are alive and well.

Cant be wasting tax payers dollars searching for them every time they go walkabout... :_<>

Just on that 20% increase, Wookie's tables are adding your figures incorrectly. Your round 4 FN game has been given a total of 1.5m when in actual fact it only amounts to 1.1m. Same as round 5 FN game. It looks like Wookie is adding up the total metro and regionals then adding these numbers together to the individual city figures again. So your 20% needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

As for last night, if the figures for fox are decent this game will be the highest rating game of the year so far, beating every NRL game. So it's not a round in isolation, it's the one that rules them all (so far)

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

Fri TV Seven/7mate #AFLHawksCrows Seven 608k (Mel 407k Ade 201k) 7mate 158k (Syd 40k Bri 17k Per 101k)
= 766k plus 254k for regionals = 1.011m without fox

#NRLBroncosSouths Nine 476k (Syd 252k Bri 225k) Gem 39k (Mel 20k Ade 5k Per 14k) = 515k FTA + 343k for regionals = 858k without fox

So, whatbut but buts will the throwballers come up with today?

Your still alive, that's good to see.

Was beginning to think something happened to you blokes, might call of that search party now..

Its good that you can get 1 win every 2 weeks and then disappear for 2 weeks until the next win comes around...

We are up easily over %20, the AFL is down simple as that really.

Ill see you in here in 2 weeks time when you get your next win...

so you cant see I posted in here a number of times last week?

No, you're not up 20%, Wookies additions are incorrect. He gave your FN round 4 game 1.5 million

As for last night, it will probably beat every NRL home and away game this year making the AFL number 1 so far.

Xman wrote:

Just on that 20% increase, Wookie's tables are adding your figures incorrectly. Your round 4 FN game has been given a total of 1.5m when in actual fact it only amounts to 1.1m. Same as round 5 FN game. It looks like Wookie is adding up the total metro and regionals then adding these numbers together to the individual city figures again. So your 20% needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

As for last night, if the figures for fox are decent this game will be the highest rating game of the year so far, beating every NRL game. So it's not a round in isolation, it's the one that rules them all (so far)

So your questioning the credibility of Wookies charts?


Wookie mate i think you need to get in here and sort this guy out, he thinks your not doing a sterling job of using your own personal time to collate these charts for all of us to enjoy.

I think i will stick with Wookies numbers, after all he puts in heaps of time and effort into those comparisons unlike your research skills which consist of making stuff up out of thin air......

Hey X man we will use your excuse you say all the time.

The NRL game was over at Half time

The AFL game was decided with seconds to go.

In fact you prob had your game of the season right there and than.

Anyways nrl still will rate well over 1.1mill
I am happy with that.

The NRL still pumping out great numbers overall

Not the one game where u blow a load on
And brag about.

Like you have won the war

You one that battle son

The NRL will win the War in season 2016

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

Just on that 20% increase, Wookie's tables are adding your figures incorrectly. Your round 4 FN game has been given a total of 1.5m when in actual fact it only amounts to 1.1m. Same as round 5 FN game. It looks like Wookie is adding up the total metro and regionals then adding these numbers together to the individual city figures again. So your 20% needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

As for last night, if the figures for fox are decent this game will be the highest rating game of the year so far, beating every NRL game. So it's not a round in isolation, it's the one that rules them all (so far)

So your questioning the credibility of Wookies charts?


Wookie mate i think you need to get in here and sort this guy out, he thinks your not doing a sterling job of using your own personal time to collate these charts for all of us to enjoy.

I think i will stick with Wookies numbers, after all he puts in heaps of time and effort into those comparisons unlike your research skills which consist of making stuff up out of thin air......

Wookies raw figures are correct because he gets them from a credible source, however he has added them together incorrectly by counting regional figures twice. Anyone with half a brain or a calculator can see that. Havent you got either?

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

Hey X man we will use your excuse you say all the time.

The NRL game was over at Half time

The AFL game was decided with seconds to go.

In fact you prob had your game of the season right there and than.

Anyways nrl still will rate well over 1.1mill
I am happy with that.

The NRL still pumping out great numbers overall

Not the one game where u blow a load on
And brag about.

Like you have won the war

You one that battle son

The NRL will win the War in season 2016

Again, last night has rated higher than any home and away NRL game so far this year, and will probably beat every NRL home and away game for the entire year. It just didnt win last night.

If the NRL is the number one sporting comp on TV why is the highest rating home and away game an AFL game?

Xman wrote:

Just on that 20% increase, Wookie's tables are adding your figures incorrectly. Your round 4 FN game has been given a total of 1.5m when in actual fact it only amounts to 1.1m. Same as round 5 FN game. It looks like Wookie is adding up the total metro and regionals then adding these numbers together to the individual city figures again. So your 20% needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

As for last night, if the figures for fox are decent this game will be the highest rating game of the year so far, beating every NRL game. So it's not a round in isolation, it's the one that rules them all (so far)

R4. FN metro 557k + 384K regionals + 229k fox = 1170 (without sky)
I imagine your Rd5 calculations are just as shit.

Last night, either way it wont make the top 10! maybe the top 20.

Hey xman how is your maths? If the NRL is up 20% how can the average per game not also be up? There are the same number of teams and games so it is patently obvious the average must be up. Your argument is nonsensible rubbish. If you're trying to argue a point you're gonna have to do better than that.

pussycat wrote:

Xman wrote:

Just on that 20% increase, Wookie's tables are adding your figures incorrectly. Your round 4 FN game has been given a total of 1.5m when in actual fact it only amounts to 1.1m. Same as round 5 FN game. It looks like Wookie is adding up the total metro and regionals then adding these numbers together to the individual city figures again. So your 20% needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

As for last night, if the figures for fox are decent this game will be the highest rating game of the year so far, beating every NRL game. So it's not a round in isolation, it's the one that rules them all (so far)

R4. FN metro 557k + 384K regionals + 229k fox = 1170 (without sky)
I imagine your Rd5 calculations are just as shit.

either way it wont make the top 10! maybe the top 20.

what are you on about?

Mal wrote:

Hey xman how is your maths? If the NRL is up 20% how can the average per game not also be up? There are the same number of teams and games so it is patently obvious the average must be up. Your argument is nonsensible rubbish. If you're trying to argue a point you're gonna have to do better than that.

the average per game will be up, which is hardly surprising given you now show 2 live prime time games instead of 1. You also show more prime time games on Fox. So of course your average will go up.

However, is this due to an increase in popularity or a change in scheduling? The total may be higher overall but if your highest rating games are about the same as last year it indicates the latter