Talking Footy

SportCapital wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:14 pm

King-Eliagh wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2017 9:57 pm

Avg AFL match = 400% more points than avg rugby league match.

During seven of the eight AFL matches ZERO Lead changes in second half of footy.The worm doesn't lie
That's right ZERO! And zero second half lead changes when in the AFL 400% more points are scored? What the fuck went wrong in the AFL 2017 finals series?

Thanks for coming douchebrains, the AFL 2017 finals were lopsided pieces of shit and there's no dodgy sums you can do to change the fact.

That sounds like 400% more exciting to me!
PS. Is that math verified...?

King-Eliagh wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:22 pm

2016 AFL finals = 25 total lead changes --- 2017 = just 15.

2016 AFL finals = 13 second half lead changes --- 2017 = just 4 (and they were all in one match)

The 2017 AFL finals series was nothing more than a lopsided piece of dogshit

The truth is out there me AFL laddettes, you just gotta open dem scared shut eyes and face it!

King-Eliagh wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:28 pm

SportCapital wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:14 pm

King-Eliagh wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2017 9:57 pm

Avg AFL match = 400% more points than avg rugby league match.

During seven of the eight AFL matches ZERO Lead changes in second half of footy.The worm doesn't lie
That's right ZERO! And zero second half lead changes when in the AFL 400% more points are scored? What the fuck went wrong in the AFL 2017 finals series?

Thanks for coming douchebrains, the AFL 2017 finals were lopsided pieces of shit and there's no dodgy sums you can do to change the fact.

That sounds like 400% more exciting to me!
PS. Is that math verified...?

If that's exciting to you you really should check out darts, it's got amaze balls high scores

Anyway whatever floats ur boat but fact is high scores don't mean close contests.

My math is my own estimate based on 40 total points scored in a NRL match vis a vis 160 in an AFL match. By ur simple mans logic this should translate to 400% more exciting lead changes right?

The_Wookie wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:45 am

leagueiscrap wrote: Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:05 am

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Nov 11, 2017 7:53 am

Fuck off
There's a dedicated thread .
You've been told
So take you're fudging bullshit in there .
This is about the on field contest comparison .

Yet you can go off and ramble non stop I’m any thread about your imaginary crowd fudging for gcs gws and the China game in any thread with zero evidence

Yet the nrlol were caught out in this current finals series fudging crowds! This thread is 2017 finals related so it is the proper place



Get fucked hypocritical POS spazza

AFLCrap and others: Im seeing the reports on this and the fact is the media report on crowd fudging pertained to the NRL finals series and as such is valid in this thread.

The_Wookie wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:37 am

his posts arent off topic in this thread. deal with it. If you want everyone to agree with you then fuck off to LU.

The_Wookie wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:53 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2017 10:42 am

The_Wookie wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:37 am

his posts arent off topic in this thread. deal with it. If you want everyone to agree with you then fuck off to LU.

& neither were mine .

I felt your post was at the time. Its been some weeks now, move on or these posts will start getting moved as well.

King-Eliagh wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:39 pm

AFL crap is 100% correct. I created this Fred and anyone who can read can see This thread has jack shit all to do with fucking crowds. I created this thread to analyse quality of matches in terms of close contests. A breath of fresh air from the constant rambling on about crowds and tv ratings. An actual analysis of footy and the on field contest.

But alas the dunder brained AFL lot, when feeling threatened, have resorted to pacifying themselves with their great crowd attendances above actually contributing to the topic of the thread at hand.

It's quite pitiful really. I feel so sorry for you guys that you can't actually take on the topic of the challenging threads I pose. It's an awful display of weakness really. Just awful

Wookie?? Hang ur head in shame and apologise to AFL crap!
And then kindly exit my awesome thread here

King-Eliagh wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:39 pm

AFL crap is 100% correct. I created this Fred and anyone who can read can see This thread has jack shit all to do with fucking crowds. I created this thread to analyse quality of matches in terms of close contests. A breath of fresh air from the constant rambling on about crowds and tv ratings. An actual analysis of footy and the on field contest.

But alas the dunder brained AFL lot, when feeling threatened, have resorted to pacifying themselves with their great crowd attendances above actually contributing to the topic of the thread at hand.

It's quite pitiful really. I feel so sorry for you guys that you can't actually take on the topic of the challenging threads I pose. It's an awful display of weakness really. Just awful

Wookie?? Hang ur head in shame and apologise to AFL crap!
And then kindly exit my awesome thread here

AFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:40 pm

The_Wookie wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:53 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2017 10:42 am

& neither were mine .

I felt your post was at the time. Its been some weeks now, move on or these posts will start getting moved as well.

Well how many threads can the unproven fudging allegation be posted in ?
Over & over .
When a Thread was made to discuss that very topic .

But apparently that's ok .


Thanks .
You've made yourself very clear .