www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
getting your excuses ready early I seeleeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:11 amIf the game is within 4pts of each other at the 80th min
I'm predicting a 4.0mill figure
(hard to know now with Digital Media)
If Thurston was playing and will only ever be a "IF"
we would be talking Highest rating game ever..
NlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:18 amgetting your excuses ready early I seeleeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:11 amIf the game is within 4pts of each other at the 80th min
I'm predicting a 4.0mill figure
(hard to know now with Digital Media)
If Thurston was playing and will only ever be a "IF"
we would be talking Highest rating game ever..
Instead of trying to talk down a game that is going to rate somewhere between 3.6M to 4M, which is ridiculous, can you explain why last weeks AFL round had 2.49 million less viewers than your best round of the year???NlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:59 amcould have, would have, should have
Youre approaching raiderdave's posting. I remember he was boasting how the NRL planned to get to 20k crowd average by 202 BEFORE they go even there. Since then their crowds have gone backwards
WTFNlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:59 amcould have, would have, should have
Youre approaching raiderdave's posting. I remember he was boasting how the NRL planned to get to 20k crowd average by 202 BEFORE they go even there. Since then their crowds have gone backwards
Let's looks at this problem from the fruiterer angle .Terry wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:09 pmInstead of trying to talk down a game that is going to rate somewhere between 3.6M to 4M, which is ridiculous, can you explain why last weeks AFL round had 2.49 million less viewers than your best round of the year???NlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:59 amcould have, would have, should have
Youre approaching raiderdave's posting. I remember he was boasting how the NRL planned to get to 20k crowd average by 202 BEFORE they go even there. Since then their crowds have gone backwards
You think more RL fans would tune in fpr a single player? Its like me saying more people would have tuned into the GF last year if Buddy was playing.leeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:13 pmWTFNlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:59 amcould have, would have, should have
Youre approaching raiderdave's posting. I remember he was boasting how the NRL planned to get to 20k crowd average by 202 BEFORE they go even there. Since then their crowds have gone backwards
what are you on about>> I made a prediction that the game could get 4mill today..
should have would have...
how can you deny that if Thurston was playing in farewell match it wouldn't rate higher...
how is that RAIDERDAVE
Id answer his post but no matter what i say he wont engage. Itll be for 'fish bowl' shit. I hve no idea why he bothersAFLcrap1 wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:30 pmLet's looks at this problem from the fruiterer angle .Terry wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:09 pmInstead of trying to talk down a game that is going to rate somewhere between 3.6M to 4M, which is ridiculous, can you explain why last weeks AFL round had 2.49 million less viewers than your best round of the year???NlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:59 amcould have, would have, should have
Youre approaching raiderdave's posting. I remember he was boasting how the NRL planned to get to 20k crowd average by 202 BEFORE they go even there. Since then their crowds have gone backwards
Um bad crop .
Hail damaged apples
In reality was apples v Pears
Umm the fruit was contaminated by OVERLAPPING trees ( message to myself..... We need STAND ALONE trees ) .
no not always.. but in this case yes..NlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:31 pmYou think more RL fans would tune in fpr a single player? Its like me saying more people would have tuned into the GF last year if Buddy was playing.leeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:13 pmWTFNlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:59 amcould have, would have, should have
Youre approaching raiderdave's posting. I remember he was boasting how the NRL planned to get to 20k crowd average by 202 BEFORE they go even there. Since then their crowds have gone backwards
what are you on about>> I made a prediction that the game could get 4mill today..
should have would have...
how can you deny that if Thurston was playing in farewell match it wouldn't rate higher...
how is that RAIDERDAVE
lol Indeed.AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:27 pmHe's grasping at straws .
People make predictions all the time .
If they don't come close you wear it .
If you're on the money ...boasting rights
SOO clearly rates around your maximum anyway, so anyone who knows who Thurston is would already be watching. ANyway, it's all hypotheticalleeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:54 pmno not always.. but in this case yes..NlolRL wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:31 pmYou think more RL fans would tune in fpr a single player? Its like me saying more people would have tuned into the GF last year if Buddy was playing.leeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:13 pm
WTF
what are you on about>> I made a prediction that the game could get 4mill today..
should have would have...
how can you deny that if Thurston was playing in farewell match it wouldn't rate higher...
how is that RAIDERDAVE
Thurston is considered the greatest player ever...
it would added extra hype to the amazing concept
they call Origin
and I will give you example.
when SHANE WARNE retired from cricket..
we saw the biggest crowds and tv figures for the ashes that year..
those extra sporting fans wanted that one last glipse at a LEGEND !! of the GAME
is tonight I believe or next week, don't know, most of Aus isn't sure/don't give a flying f&$K either.