Page 21 of 29

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:28 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Rubbish

It clearly says news ltd through valimanda kicked in 16.8m. That's a yearly bail out. They fall short with sustainable revenue like gate receipts, memberships, sponsorships, every year.
It clearly says news ltd through valimanda kicked in 16.8m
:lol: :lol: :lol:
thats expenditure on their football operations you gimp :lol: :lol:

& they made a 1.6 Million profit
meaning their income was 18.4 Million for that year ......

wow
what a moron :lol: :lol: :lol:

Storm self sufficient
good job :cool:
the club's latest annual report shows that all but $2 million of its $19 million income came from Valimanda, a wholly owned subsidiary of the media group News Ltd.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/rugby-league/l ... z2GmUDVho1
all but 2 million of its entire income eh ?

:lol: :lol: :lol:
tell me ..... what did they do with the annual grant of 4.4 Million the NRL gave them then ?


wot utter BS :lol: :lol:
nice try marcus
but another fail .............

Storm expenditure 17m
revenue ..... 18.6 Million

Storm self sufficient
good on them :cool:

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:40 pm
by Drac
I wonder if Dave says 'Storm self sufficient' enough it'll come true? Is there a fairy godmother out there that grants magical wishes to *********?

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:08 pm
by Raiderdave
Drac wrote:
Is there a fairy godmother out there that grants magical wishes to *********?
I dunno .... spewie?



marcus ?

:-k

anything ?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:15 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
thats expenditure on their football operations you gimp :lol: :lol:

& they made a 1.6 Million profit
meaning their income was 18.4 Million for that year ......

wow
what a moron :lol: :lol: :lol:

Storm self sufficient
good job :cool:
the club's latest annual report shows that all but $2 million of its $19 million income came from Valimanda, a wholly owned subsidiary of the media group News Ltd.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/rugby-league/l ... z2GmUDVho1
all but 2 million of its entire income eh ?

:lol: :lol: :lol:
tell me ..... what did they do with the annual grant of 4.4 Million the NRL gave them then ?


wot utter BS :lol: :lol:
nice try marcus
but another fail .............

Storm expenditure 17m
revenue ..... 18.6 Million

Storm self sufficient
good on them :cool:
that was a quote in the article Dave, not mine. It shows the Storm made only 2m of their own money with rest coming from grants or payments from their owners! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:51 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
the club's latest annual report shows that all but $2 million of its $19 million income came from Valimanda, a wholly owned subsidiary of the media group News Ltd.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/rugby-league/l ... z2GmUDVho1
all but 2 million of its entire income eh ?

:lol: :lol: :lol:
tell me ..... what did they do with the annual grant of 4.4 Million the NRL gave them then ?


wot utter BS :lol: :lol:
nice try marcus
but another fail .............

Storm expenditure 17m
revenue ..... 18.6 Million

Storm self sufficient
good on them :cool:
that was a quote in the article Dave, not mine. It shows the Storm made only 2m of their own money with rest coming from grants or payments from their owners! :lol: :lol: :lol:

but but but :lol: :lol: :lol:

Marcus
taking failure to new levels :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:02 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
all but 2 million of its entire income eh ?

:lol: :lol: :lol:
tell me ..... what did they do with the annual grant of 4.4 Million the NRL gave them then ?


wot utter BS :lol: :lol:
nice try marcus
but another fail .............

Storm expenditure 17m
revenue ..... 18.6 Million

Storm self sufficient
good on them :cool:
that was a quote in the article Dave, not mine. It shows the Storm made only 2m of their own money with rest coming from grants or payments from their owners! :lol: :lol: :lol:

but but but :lol: :lol: :lol:

Marcus
taking failure to new levels :lol: :lol: :lol:
are you sure youve responded to the correct post Dave? Where s the 'but' in that post? :lol: :lol:

Dave, taking stupidity to new depths...

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:08 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
that was a quote in the article Dave, not mine. It shows the Storm made only 2m of their own money with rest coming from grants or payments from their owners! :lol: :lol: :lol:

but but but :lol: :lol: :lol:

Marcus
taking failure to new levels :lol: :lol: :lol:
are you sure youve responded to the correct post Dave? Where s the 'but' in that post? :lol: :lol:

Dave, taking stupidity to new depths...
well at times its hard to remember which of you f wits is ... derping it up with mind boggling stupidity
but no this one is yours
all yours
enjoy :cool:

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:17 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

but but but :lol: :lol: :lol:

Marcus
taking failure to new levels :lol: :lol: :lol:
are you sure youve responded to the correct post Dave? Where s the 'but' in that post? :lol: :lol:

Dave, taking stupidity to new depths...
well at times its hard to remember which of you f wits is ... derping it up with mind boggling stupidity
but no this one is yours
all yours
enjoy :cool:
well its completely out of context moron. Theres not one excuse in my post. :lol:

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:53 pm
by eelofwest
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
are you sure youve responded to the correct post Dave? Where s the 'but' in that post? :lol: :lol:

Dave, taking stupidity to new depths...
well at times its hard to remember which of you f wits is ... derping it up with mind boggling stupidity
but no this one is yours
all yours
enjoy :cool:
well its completely out of context moron. Theres not one excuse in my post. :lol:

LADDER View Full Ladder
CLUB P PTS
Central Coast Mariners FC 14 30
Adelaide United FC 14 28
Western Sydney Wanderers FC 14 23
Melbourne Victory FC 14 23
Perth Glory FC 14 18
Brisbane Roar FC 14 17
Wellington Phoenix FC 14 16
Newcastle Jets FC 14 16
Melbourne Heart FC 14 15
Sydney FC 14 13


Wanderers-------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.Midgets................... :lol: :lol:

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:12 pm
by Xman
eelofwest wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
well at times its hard to remember which of you f wits is ... derping it up with mind boggling stupidity
but no this one is yours
all yours
enjoy :cool:
well its completely out of context moron. Theres not one excuse in my post. :lol:

LADDER View Full Ladder
CLUB P PTS
Central Coast Mariners FC 14 30
Adelaide United FC 14 28
Western Sydney Wanderers FC 14 23
Melbourne Victory FC 14 23
Perth Glory FC 14 18
Brisbane Roar FC 14 17
Wellington Phoenix FC 14 16
Newcastle Jets FC 14 16
Melbourne Heart FC 14 15
Sydney FC 14 13


Wanderers-------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.Midgets................... :lol: :lol:
and about 8 NRL teams :lol:

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:44 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
are you sure youve responded to the correct post Dave? Where s the 'but' in that post? :lol: :lol:

Dave, taking stupidity to new depths...
well at times its hard to remember which of you f wits is ... derping it up with mind boggling stupidity
but no this one is yours
all yours
enjoy :cool:
well its completely out of context moron. Theres not one excuse in my post. :lol:

you're butting ... when called out on butting 8-[ ......... :-k

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:50 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
eelofwest wrote:
Xman wrote:
well at times its hard to remember which of you f wits is ... derping it up with mind boggling stupidity
but no this one is yours
all yours
enjoy :cool:
well its completely out of context moron. Theres not one excuse in my post. :lol:

LADDER View Full Ladder
CLUB P PTS
Central Coast Mariners FC 14 30
Adelaide United FC 14 28
Western Sydney Wanderers FC 14 23
Melbourne Victory FC 14 23
Perth Glory FC 14 18
Brisbane Roar FC 14 17
Wellington Phoenix FC 14 16
Newcastle Jets FC 14 16
Melbourne Heart FC 14 15
Sydney FC 14 13


Wanderers-------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.Midgets................... :lol: :lol:
and about 8 NRL teams :lol:[/quote]

but but but ........... :lol: :lol: :lol:

when will it stop with this lot
:cool:

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:11 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
well at times its hard to remember which of you f wits is ... derping it up with mind boggling stupidity
but no this one is yours
all yours
enjoy :cool:
well its completely out of context moron. Theres not one excuse in my post. :lol:

you're butting ... when called out on butting 8-[ ......... :-k

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Butting suggests excuses. I posted none dunce :roll:

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:15 pm
by Stewie
Looks like the Wanderers are smashing plenty of western Sydney nRL teams as well as the pathetic arse Raiders. After all this is soccer and rl heartland isn't it?

Re: Wanderers >>>>> the Midgits

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:42 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:
Looks like the Wanderers are smashing plenty of western Sydney nRL teams as well as the pathetic arse Raiders. After all this is soccer and rl heartland isn't it?
the youngest Western NRL side is Penrith , & they are 46 years old
impossible to make a comparison between the first year of one side & the 46th of another isn't it .... :-k

however we do have 2 sides in their first year to look at don't we *********** ? :wink:
how are they stacking up against each other ? :cool: