Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Having closer games doesn't guarantee more interest. teams :

so you think blow outs will..............

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Having closer games doesn't guarantee more interest. teams :

so you think blow outs will..............

Not guarantee, no. Who wants to watch a nil all draw..

Hahaha Xman will you ever stop needing to reign in your ridiculous statements?

So we're approaching the eve of yet another AFL comp folks. What's the verdict? I predicted very early on, before media and anyone else on the planet I'm fairly sure, that last year's AFL comp would be the most lopsided of all times. And...? It was. I was dead right. An awesome prediction only in the fact I was the first to predict it. The makeup of the comp, the woeful expansion methods and the many many corrupt inethical manouvres conducted by those at AFL hq really made it quite obvious the comp would be lopsided. So what about this year lads? Can it be worse than last and set a new all time record?

Take a punt folks and make your call early and with conviction like I did last year. You never know, you might just be right and be able to bath in the kudos that being right enables. Like me right now.

Yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh booooiiiiiiiiiii

There were a number of nRL blowouts this round weren't there KE?

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hahaha Xman will you ever stop needing to reign in your ridiculous statements?

So we're approaching the eve of yet another AFL comp folks. What's the verdict? I predicted very early on, before media and anyone else on the planet I'm fairly sure, that last year's AFL comp would be the most lopsided of all times. And...? It was. I was dead right. An awesome prediction only in the fact I was the first to predict it. The makeup of the comp, the woeful expansion methods and the many many corrupt inethical manouvres conducted by those at AFL hq really made it quite obvious the comp would be lopsided. So what about this year lads? Can it be worse than last and set a new all time record?

Take a punt folks and make your call early and with conviction like I did last year. You never know, you might just be right and be able to bath in the kudos that being right enables. Like me right now.

Yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh booooiiiiiiiiiii

Didn't I show statistically that the NRL comp was more lopsided percentage wise. I think it is just the big numbers that get the NRL supporters on this forum a little confused. Oh wait a minute ..... Troll on KE.

Here let me show you an example. I will make it small numbers to keep it simple, because big numbers seam to confuse the RL fans on this site. Lets say an AFL team lost 20 goals to 10 ( a big loss in AFL) Is this worse percentage wise then say :
The rooster loss 28 to 10 or the warriors loss 40 to 10 or the raiders loss 32 to 10 or the dragons loss 30 to 10 or the tigers loss 42 to 10 on the weekend?
Wow how lopsided is your comp that's just ridiculous.

piesman2011 wrote:

Here let me show you an example. I will make it small numbers to keep it simple, because big numbers seam to confuse the RL fans on this site. Lets say an AFL team lost 20 goals to 10 ( a big loss in AFL) Is this worse percentage wise then say :
The rooster loss 28 to 10 or the warriors loss 40 to 10 or the raiders loss 32 to 10 or the dragons loss 30 to 10 or the tigers loss 42 to 10 on the weekend?
Wow how lopsided is your comp that's just ridiculous.

Yeah a heap of blowouts in the NRLs first round.

piesman2011 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hahaha Xman will you ever stop needing to reign in your ridiculous statements?

So we're approaching the eve of yet another AFL comp folks. What's the verdict? I predicted very early on, before media and anyone else on the planet I'm fairly sure, that last year's AFL comp would be the most lopsided of all times. And...? It was. I was dead right. An awesome prediction only in the fact I was the first to predict it. The makeup of the comp, the woeful expansion methods and the many many corrupt inethical manouvres conducted by those at AFL hq really made it quite obvious the comp would be lopsided. So what about this year lads? Can it be worse than last and set a new all time record?

Take a punt folks and make your call early and with conviction like I did last year. You never know, you might just be right and be able to bath in the kudos that being right enables. Like me right now.

Yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh booooiiiiiiiiiii

Didn't I show statistically that the NRL comp was more lopsided percentage wise. I think it is just the big numbers that get the NRL supporters on this forum a little confused. Oh wait a minute ..... Troll on KE.

ahhhhhhhhhhhhh



the NRL is a more lopsided comp



100 point plus floggings nearly every week in the VFL in 2012 & 6 sides out of contention for finals by the halfway mark
while the NRL had about 3 sides not a realistic chance for finals .... with only 6 rounds to go

the VFL.. a boring lopsided pile of puke , where 6 sides simply cannot make the finals
the NRL.. an even , close ... exciting comps where all sides are a chance to play finals =D> =D> =D>

piesman2011 wrote:

Here let me show you an example. I will make it small numbers to keep it simple, because big numbers seam to confuse the RL fans on this site. Lets say an AFL team lost 20 goals to 10 ( a big loss in AFL) Is this worse percentage wise then say :
The rooster loss 28 to 10 or the warriors loss 40 to 10 or the raiders loss 32 to 10 or the dragons loss 30 to 10 or the tigers loss 42 to 10 on the weekend?
Wow how lopsided is your comp that's just ridiculous.

lop sided comp does not mean scores in isloation dribbler


it means if these teams will compete for finals
& let me tell you
every one of the above sides will

the bumbling clown sides in the VFL.. of which there more then there has ever been, will not only get regularly rounded up
they will not at any stage in the season .. look likley to challenge for a finals spot

this is the difference between our comp & your abortion of a comp

AFL Blowouts 2012

Round 1
GWS 37 - 100 SYD, GCS 68 - 137 ADE
Round 2
BRI 63 - 154 CAR, WCE 166 - 58 MEL, NM 183 - 54 GWS, STK 139 - 47 GCS
Round 3
CAR 122 - 62 COL, RIC 133 - 74 MEL ,WBD 40 - 103 STK, GWS 69 - 150 WCE, HAW 140 - 84 ADE
Round 4
BRI 111 - 46 GCS , GWS 62 - 104 WBD
Round 6
ESS 129 - 62 BRI CAR 110 - 43 GWS
Round 7
MEL 49 - 115 HAW, ADE 122 - 72 GEE, BRI 58 - 116 COL, ESS 113 - 52 WCE,
Round 8
HAW 119 - 63 FRE, SYD 138 - 37 MEL, WBD 72 - 34 GCS, CAR 55 - 124 ADE,
BRI 132 - 40 GWS
Round 9
RIC 137 - 75 HAW, GWS 53 - 119 ESS, CAR 107 - 49 MEL,
Round 10
GEE 126 - 61 GWS, HAW 174 - 59 NM, SYD 132 - 40 WBD, COL 149 - 52 GCS
Round 11 Byes for NM, Brisbane, GWS, WCE, WBD
GCS 49 - 144 STK
Round 12 Byes for Collingwood, Sydney, Essendon, Melbourne Demons, Dockers.
HAW 135 - 70 BRI,
Round 13 Byes for Richmond, Hawthorn, Port Ade, St Kilda, Gold Coast Suns, Carlton.
WBD 56 - 114 BRI, MEL 135 - 57 GWS
Round 14
WCE 166 - 40 GCS, SYD 132 - 38 GWS, ESS 140 - 56 WBD, BRI 122 - 61 MEL
Round 15
SYD 110 - 63 BRI, STK 133 - 62 ESS, POR 58 - 116 ADE, HAW 193 - 31 GWS
Round 16
GWS 59 - 178 ADE, WBD 44 - 116 HAW
Round 17
GEE 134 - 67 ESS, FRE 132 - 37 GWS
Round 18
ESS 86 - 180 HAW, GWS 54 - 174 COL, GCS 54 - 126 SYD, STK 118 - 42 WBD, WCE 175 - 77 BRI Wow 5 games were dead set floggings in 1 round of AFL..
Round 19 OMG NO FLOGGINGS, THIS HAS TO BE A FIRST....
Round 20
RIC 150 - 80 WBD, HAW 159 - 87 POR
Round 21
ESS 60 - 156 CAR, WB 85 - 167 SYD, HAW 129 - 65 GCS


The VFL
13 Brisbane 20 8 0 12 86.27 32
14 Port Adelaide 20 5 0 15 77.15 20
15 Bulldogs 20 5 0 15 68.15 20
16 Melbourne 20 4 0 16 69.81 16
17 Gold Coast 20 2 0 18 60.17 8
18 Greater Western Sydney 20 2 0 18 46.64 8

1. GWS 15 Floggings
2. GCS 10 Floggings
3. WBD 8 Floggings
4. Mel 6 Floggings
5. BRI 6 Floggings

Round 21
P W D L % Pts
1 Sydney 20 16 0 4 149.61 64
2 Hawthorn 20 15 0 5 158.29 60
3 Adelaide 20 15 0 5 125.74 60
4 Collingwood 20 15 0 5 119.28 60
5 West Coast 20 14 0 6 124.97 56
6 North Melbourne 20 13 0 7 115.20 52
7 Geelong 20 13 0 7 114.70 52
8 Fremantle 20 12 0 8 109.61 48
9 Carlton 20 11 0 9 110.52 44
10 Essendon 20 11 0 9 104.14 44
11 St Kilda 20 10 0 10 116.94 40
12 Richmond 20 9 0 11 110.17 36
13 Brisbane 20 8 0 12 86.27 32
14 Port Adelaide 20 5 0 15 77.15 20
15 Bulldogs 20 5 0 15 68.15 20
16 Melbourne 20 4 0 16 69.81 16
17 Gold Coast 20 2 0 18 60.17 8
18 Greater Western Sydney 20 2 0 18 46.64 8

NRL with same points system
Round 24
W L D B PD Pts
1 Bulldogs 17 5 0 2 195 76
2 Storm 15 7 0 2 196 68
3 Rabbitohs 14 8 0 2 77 64
4 Sea Eagles 14 8 0 2 76 64
5 Sharks 12 9 1 2 20 56
6 Cowboys 12 9 0 2 120 56
7 Broncos 11 11 0 2 37 52
8 Tigers 11 11 0 2 -1 52
9 Raiders 11 11 0 2 -39 52
10 Titans 10 12 0 2 -6 48
11 Knights 10 12 0 2 -20 48
12 Dragons 9 12 0 2 -76 44
13 Warriors 8 14 0 2 -60 40
14 Roosters 7 14 1 2 -156 36
15 Panthers 7 15 0 2 -173 36
16 Eels 6 16 0 2 -190 32[/quote]

Our Toyota cup is more competitive then the AFL...



Pos Team P W L D PF PA PTS
1 Canberra Raiders U20s 22 16 6 0 742 527 36
2 Cant'bury-B'town Bulldogs U20s 22 15 6 1 692 477 35
3 Warriors U20s 22 15 6 1 626 476 35
4 Wests Tigers U20s 22 14 8 0 626 452 32
5 Penrith Panthers U20s 22 13 8 1 582 465 31
6 Sydney Roosters U20s 22 12 8 2 626 518 30
7 St George Illawarra Dragons U2 22 12 9 1 572 495 29
8 South Sydney Rabbitohs U20s 22 12 9 1 630 560 29
9 Melbourne Storm U20s 22 11 9 2 501 520 28
10 Cronulla Sharks U20s 22 11 9 2 579 612 28
11 Newcastle Knights U20s 22 9 12 1 596 520 23
12 Brisbane Broncos U20s 22 7 15 0 564 734 18
13 North Queensland Cowboys U20s 22 6 14 2 493 680 18
14 Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles U20s 22 5 15 2 451 772 16
15 Parramatta Eels U20s 22 5 17 0 524 722 14
16 Gold Coast Titans U20s 22 5 17 0 414 688 14


Now take into account all the rested players against the bottom 5 sides and it starts to paint a even more lobsided comp in 2012 then first thought, also add to that the late subbing of teams best players once they have a massive lead and we have the most lobsided comp in the world.........

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hahaha Xman will you ever stop needing to reign in your ridiculous statements?

So we're approaching the eve of yet another AFL comp folks. What's the verdict? I predicted very early on, before media and anyone else on the planet I'm fairly sure, that last year's AFL comp would be the most lopsided of all times. And...? It was. I was dead right. An awesome prediction only in the fact I was the first to predict it. The makeup of the comp, the woeful expansion methods and the many many corrupt inethical manouvres conducted by those at AFL hq really made it quite obvious the comp would be lopsided. So what about this year lads? Can it be worse than last and set a new all time record?

Take a punt folks and make your call early and with conviction like I did last year. You never know, you might just be right and be able to bath in the kudos that being right enables. Like me right now.

Yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh booooiiiiiiiiiii

Didn't I show statistically that the NRL comp was more lopsided percentage wise. I think it is just the big numbers that get the NRL supporters on this forum a little confused. Oh wait a minute ..... Troll on KE.

ahhhhhhhhhhhhh



the NRL is a more lopsided comp



100 point plus floggings nearly every week in the VFL in 2012 & 6 sides out of contention for finals by the halfway mark
while the NRL had about 3 sides not a realistic chance for finals .... with only 6 rounds to go

the VFL.. a boring lopsided pile of puke , where 6 sides simply cannot make the finals
the NRL.. an even , close ... exciting comps where all sides are a chance to play finals =D> =D> =D>

Big numbers confusing you dave? Thanks for making my point for me. Keep up the good work.

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Here let me show you an example. I will make it small numbers to keep it simple, because big numbers seam to confuse the RL fans on this site. Lets say an AFL team lost 20 goals to 10 ( a big loss in AFL) Is this worse percentage wise then say :
The rooster loss 28 to 10 or the warriors loss 40 to 10 or the raiders loss 32 to 10 or the dragons loss 30 to 10 or the tigers loss 42 to 10 on the weekend?
Wow how lopsided is your comp that's just ridiculous.

lop sided comp does not mean scores in isloation dribbler


it means if these teams will compete for finals
& let me tell you
every one of the above sides will

the bumbling clown sides in the VFL.. of which there more then there has ever been, will not only get regularly rounded up
they will not at any stage in the season .. look likley to challenge for a finals spot

this is the difference between our comp & your abortion of a comp

dribble dribble dribble. Answer the question fool. Percentage wise, which is the worse loss. The AFL 10 goal drubbing or any of the 5 losses I pointed out from the weekend? FYI 75% (6/8)of the NRL games were as bad or worse (5/8 being worse) then the 20 to 10 goal loss I pointed out as a bad loss in AFL. The rest is just subjective observation comming from someone with no knowledge of the sport of AFL. All of last year was the same for the NRL with percentage loses much bigger then the AFL. You are just to ignorant to understand.nwhen to see big score that your sport doesnt have, you look at it and say wow 60 point loss that must be massive, but in reality it's much smaller then the 32 point West's loss on the weekend.

eelofwest wrote:

AFL Blowouts 2012

Round 1
GWS 37 - 100 SYD, GCS 68 - 137 ADE
Round 2
BRI 63 - 154 CAR, WCE 166 - 58 MEL, NM 183 - 54 GWS, STK 139 - 47 GCS
Round 3
CAR 122 - 62 COL, RIC 133 - 74 MEL ,WBD 40 - 103 STK, GWS 69 - 150 WCE, HAW 140 - 84 ADE
Round 4
BRI 111 - 46 GCS , GWS 62 - 104 WBD
Round 6
ESS 129 - 62 BRI CAR 110 - 43 GWS
Round 7
MEL 49 - 115 HAW, ADE 122 - 72 GEE, BRI 58 - 116 COL, ESS 113 - 52 WCE,
Round 8
HAW 119 - 63 FRE, SYD 138 - 37 MEL, WBD 72 - 34 GCS, CAR 55 - 124 ADE,
BRI 132 - 40 GWS
Round 9
RIC 137 - 75 HAW, GWS 53 - 119 ESS, CAR 107 - 49 MEL,
Round 10
GEE 126 - 61 GWS, HAW 174 - 59 NM, SYD 132 - 40 WBD, COL 149 - 52 GCS
Round 11 Byes for NM, Brisbane, GWS, WCE, WBD
GCS 49 - 144 STK
Round 12 Byes for Collingwood, Sydney, Essendon, Melbourne Demons, Dockers.
HAW 135 - 70 BRI,
Round 13 Byes for Richmond, Hawthorn, Port Ade, St Kilda, Gold Coast Suns, Carlton.
WBD 56 - 114 BRI, MEL 135 - 57 GWS
Round 14
WCE 166 - 40 GCS, SYD 132 - 38 GWS, ESS 140 - 56 WBD, BRI 122 - 61 MEL
Round 15
SYD 110 - 63 BRI, STK 133 - 62 ESS, POR 58 - 116 ADE, HAW 193 - 31 GWS
Round 16
GWS 59 - 178 ADE, WBD 44 - 116 HAW
Round 17
GEE 134 - 67 ESS, FRE 132 - 37 GWS
Round 18
ESS 86 - 180 HAW, GWS 54 - 174 COL, GCS 54 - 126 SYD, STK 118 - 42 WBD, WCE 175 - 77 BRI Wow 5 games were dead set floggings in 1 round of AFL..
Round 19 OMG NO FLOGGINGS, THIS HAS TO BE A FIRST....
Round 20
RIC 150 - 80 WBD, HAW 159 - 87 POR
Round 21
ESS 60 - 156 CAR, WB 85 - 167 SYD, HAW 129 - 65 GCS


The VFL
13 Brisbane 20 8 0 12 86.27 32
14 Port Adelaide 20 5 0 15 77.15 20
15 Bulldogs 20 5 0 15 68.15 20
16 Melbourne 20 4 0 16 69.81 16
17 Gold Coast 20 2 0 18 60.17 8
18 Greater Western Sydney 20 2 0 18 46.64 8

1. GWS 15 Floggings
2. GCS 10 Floggings
3. WBD 8 Floggings
4. Mel 6 Floggings
5. BRI 6 Floggings

Round 21
P W D L % Pts
1 Sydney 20 16 0 4 149.61 64
2 Hawthorn 20 15 0 5 158.29 60
3 Adelaide 20 15 0 5 125.74 60
4 Collingwood 20 15 0 5 119.28 60
5 West Coast 20 14 0 6 124.97 56
6 North Melbourne 20 13 0 7 115.20 52
7 Geelong 20 13 0 7 114.70 52
8 Fremantle 20 12 0 8 109.61 48
9 Carlton 20 11 0 9 110.52 44
10 Essendon 20 11 0 9 104.14 44
11 St Kilda 20 10 0 10 116.94 40
12 Richmond 20 9 0 11 110.17 36
13 Brisbane 20 8 0 12 86.27 32
14 Port Adelaide 20 5 0 15 77.15 20
15 Bulldogs 20 5 0 15 68.15 20
16 Melbourne 20 4 0 16 69.81 16
17 Gold Coast 20 2 0 18 60.17 8
18 Greater Western Sydney 20 2 0 18 46.64 8

NRL with same points system
Round 24
W L D B PD Pts
1 Bulldogs 17 5 0 2 195 76
2 Storm 15 7 0 2 196 68
3 Rabbitohs 14 8 0 2 77 64
4 Sea Eagles 14 8 0 2 76 64
5 Sharks 12 9 1 2 20 56
6 Cowboys 12 9 0 2 120 56
7 Broncos 11 11 0 2 37 52
8 Tigers 11 11 0 2 -1 52
9 Raiders 11 11 0 2 -39 52
10 Titans 10 12 0 2 -6 48
11 Knights 10 12 0 2 -20 48
12 Dragons 9 12 0 2 -76 44
13 Warriors 8 14 0 2 -60 40
14 Roosters 7 14 1 2 -156 36
15 Panthers 7 15 0 2 -173 36
16 Eels 6 16 0 2 -190 32

Our Toyota cup is more competitive then the AFL...



Pos Team P W L D PF PA PTS
1 Canberra Raiders U20s 22 16 6 0 742 527 36
2 Cant'bury-B'town Bulldogs U20s 22 15 6 1 692 477 35
3 Warriors U20s 22 15 6 1 626 476 35
4 Wests Tigers U20s 22 14 8 0 626 452 32
5 Penrith Panthers U20s 22 13 8 1 582 465 31
6 Sydney Roosters U20s 22 12 8 2 626 518 30
7 St George Illawarra Dragons U2 22 12 9 1 572 495 29
8 South Sydney Rabbitohs U20s 22 12 9 1 630 560 29
9 Melbourne Storm U20s 22 11 9 2 501 520 28
10 Cronulla Sharks U20s 22 11 9 2 579 612 28
11 Newcastle Knights U20s 22 9 12 1 596 520 23
12 Brisbane Broncos U20s 22 7 15 0 564 734 18
13 North Queensland Cowboys U20s 22 6 14 2 493 680 18
14 Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles U20s 22 5 15 2 451 772 16
15 Parramatta Eels U20s 22 5 17 0 524 722 14
16 Gold Coast Titans U20s 22 5 17 0 414 688 14


Now take into account all the rested players against the bottom 5 sides and it starts to paint a even more lobsided comp in 2012 then first thought, also add to that the late subbing of teams best players once they have a massive lead and we have the most lobsided comp in the world......... [/quote]


The sad thing eels is that none of those AFL losses from all of last season are worse percentage wise then the 42 to 10 loss in the NRL round one this season (apart from one). If that was an AFL score (lets multiply it by 5) thats about 210 to 50.

Yeah I know they look like big numbers. Thanks for helping me make my point.

piesman2011 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hahaha Xman will you ever stop needing to reign in your ridiculous statements?

So we're approaching the eve of yet another AFL comp folks. What's the verdict? I predicted very early on, before media and anyone else on the planet I'm fairly sure, that last year's AFL comp would be the most lopsided of all times. And...? It was. I was dead right. An awesome prediction only in the fact I was the first to predict it. The makeup of the comp, the woeful expansion methods and the many many corrupt inethical manouvres conducted by those at AFL hq really made it quite obvious the comp would be lopsided. So what about this year lads? Can it be worse than last and set a new all time record?

Take a punt folks and make your call early and with conviction like I did last year. You never know, you might just be right and be able to bath in the kudos that being right enables. Like me right now.

Yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh booooiiiiiiiiiii

Didn't I show statistically that the NRL comp was more lopsided percentage wise. I think it is just the big numbers that get the NRL supporters on this forum a little confused. Oh wait a minute ..... Troll on KE.

Oh pies, you're starting to sound like Xman here. Statistically? Percentagewise? These terms mean jack diddly squat and are nothing more than a diversionary tactic to hid from the facts. And you know it :D

Lopsided essentially means imbalanced. It doesnt mean a 'statistical percentagewise' comparison between apples and oranges, which is what you've awkwardly and invalidly put together.

Look in essence this see saw describes the AFL comp last season, which was the most lopsided in the history of the org.



The fatcat fools down at AFL HQ came up with ridiculous policies which effectively ensured that there was a massive gap between the top 6 teams and the bottom six teams. This can be proven by looking back at the final ladders of previous comps, where never before have so many teams at the bottom of the comp won so few games. The NRL did not have this chasm between its top teams and bottom six. No, it was much more balanced comp in re to wins and losses than was the oh so predictable AFL 2012 comp.

Comprehende?

King-Eliagh wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hahaha Xman will you ever stop needing to reign in your ridiculous statements?

So we're approaching the eve of yet another AFL comp folks. What's the verdict? I predicted very early on, before media and anyone else on the planet I'm fairly sure, that last year's AFL comp would be the most lopsided of all times. And...? It was. I was dead right. An awesome prediction only in the fact I was the first to predict it. The makeup of the comp, the woeful expansion methods and the many many corrupt inethical manouvres conducted by those at AFL hq really made it quite obvious the comp would be lopsided. So what about this year lads? Can it be worse than last and set a new all time record?

Take a punt folks and make your call early and with conviction like I did last year. You never know, you might just be right and be able to bath in the kudos that being right enables. Like me right now.

Yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh booooiiiiiiiiiii

Didn't I show statistically that the NRL comp was more lopsided percentage wise. I think it is just the big numbers that get the NRL supporters on this forum a little confused. Oh wait a minute ..... Troll on KE.

Oh pies, you're starting to sound like Xman here. Statistically? Percentagewise? These terms mean jack diddly squat and are nothing more than a diversionary tactic to hid from the facts. And you know it :D

Lopsided essentially means imbalanced. It doesnt mean a 'statistical percentagewise' comparison between apples and oranges, which is what you've awkwardly and invalidly put together.

Look in essence this see saw describes the AFL comp last season, which was the most lopsided in the history of the org.



The fatcat fools down at AFL HQ came up with ridiculous policies which effectively ensured that there was a massive gap between the top 6 teams and the bottom six teams. This can be proven by looking back at the final ladders of previous comps, where never before have so many teams at the bottom of the comp won so few games. The NRL did not have this chasm between its top teams and bottom six. No, it was much more balanced comp in re to wins and losses than was the oh so predictable AFL 2012 comp.

Comprehende?

Talk all you want about AFL policy and your interpretation of a competition that you dont really follow. Add a few cool looking pictures to add empacisis to your lack of substance and all that you get is a whole lot of ramble and no real substance.
I deal in hard cold stats. Your competition is more lopsided and the only way to prove me wrong is show the stats. Lots of big numbers just seams to confuse you guys into believing a fallacy. Show me the stats or shut up.