Talking Footy

Beaussie wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.

im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus

gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol

Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take note

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.

im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus

gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol

Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take note

So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there Beaussie

Beaussie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.

im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus

gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol

Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take note

So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there Beaussie

Coming from such a pitiful figure for your last broadcast rights, I can see how you would like to spin that 50% growth line. No one else is falling for it though.

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.

im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus

gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol

Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take note

So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there Beaussie

Coming from such a pitiful figure for your last broadcast rights, I can see how you would like to spin that 50% growth line. No one else is falling for it though.

So it isn't a 50% growth? Actually $60M would be more than 50% as it looks likely the Socceroos will be taken out of the broadcast rights and sold separately. So $60M is 50% more than $40M but that $40M included international games. Sorry I know you AFL people have a hard time with international games.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Simple fact is Sokka just doesn't rate .
Tried it on FTA ..rated terribly
STV ratings ..woeful

I can't see any way there will be a massive increase .
Only way is a bidding war
FOX V OPTUS or another .
If that doesn't happen ...good luck with an increase

Beaussie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.

im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus

gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol

Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take note

So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there Beaussie

Coming from such a pitiful figure for your last broadcast rights, I can see how you would like to spin that 50% growth line. No one else is falling for it though.

So it isn't a 50% growth? Actually $60M would be more than 50% as it looks likely the Socceroos will be taken out of the broadcast rights and sold separately. So $60M is 50% more than $40M but that $40M included international games. Sorry I know you AFL people have a hard time with international games.

Get back to us when you lot a discussing billion dollar broadcast deals in this country. $60 million eh?

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.

im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus

gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol

Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take note

So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there Beaussie

Coming from such a pitiful figure for your last broadcast rights, I can see how you would like to spin that 50% growth line. No one else is falling for it though.

So it isn't a 50% growth? Actually $60M would be more than 50% as it looks likely the Socceroos will be taken out of the broadcast rights and sold separately. So $60M is 50% more than $40M but that $40M included international games. Sorry I know you AFL people have a hard time with international games.

Get back to us when you lot a discussing billion dollar broadcast deals in this country. $60 million eh?

You don't have a $billion annual TV deal you idiot

Beaussie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

sydneyfc wrote:

not as optimistic as others in regards to the tv deal, i feel like its a no brainer that it will improve, but some people saying we'll get 80m etc i just dont see it.

im expecting $60m and anything more than that would be a welcomed bonus

gallops presser where he says cahill was virtually the most important part of the tv deal was cringey as well. maybe im just bitter cahill-despiser andd that....i just cant like a guy thatkept telling us that he's doing it for the good of the game(playing in the US and china) refused to come to australia until we had to fork out $4 million(half of which is subsidized by the ffa which hurts all the clubs) at age 37 ffs- but its ok! he has footy clinics '4 da kids' in the school holidays...but charges them $1000 a head to participate....lol

Finally some reality from a soccer fan. post_hoc take note

So a 50% increase isn't a major improvement? LOL Sydney FC is saying 50% improvement he would be happy with, I think it will be more but hey 50% growth in 3 years??? I think is a substantial outcome, so not really sure what you are saying there Beaussie

Coming from such a pitiful figure for your last broadcast rights, I can see how you would like to spin that 50% growth line. No one else is falling for it though.

So it isn't a 50% growth? Actually $60M would be more than 50% as it looks likely the Socceroos will be taken out of the broadcast rights and sold separately. So $60M is 50% more than $40M but that $40M included international games. Sorry I know you AFL people have a hard time with international games.

Get back to us when you lot a discussing billion dollar broadcast deals in this country. $60 million eh?

You don't have a $billion annual TV deal you idiot

Where did I mention anything about annual figures. FFS

Beaussie wrote:

Any commercial networks expressed any interest thus far? Hmmm

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Any commercial networks expressed any interest thus far? Hmmm

Yep, and you saw the start of it last week and you will see it again on Tuesday night. Channel 9 are showing the Socceroos qualifying rounds.

post_hoc wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Any commercial networks expressed any interest thus far? Hmmm

Yep, and you saw the start of it last week and you will see it again on Tuesday night. Channel 9 are showing the Socceroos qualifying rounds.

A-League TV rights to be sold separately from Socceroos
DAVID DAVUTOVIC, Herald Sun
May 9, 2016 7:57pm

THE A-League TV rights will be sold independently for the first time, with FFA blocked from bundling Socceroos rights into one package.

The unprecedented step leaves uncertainty around the A-League’s broadcast value, with the current $40m-a-year TV deal inclusive of the first phase of 2018 World Cup qualifiers and the 2015 Asian Cup.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/footb ... bff774a5fb